SUICIDE TRUNK, I DID IT, check it out
10-03-02, 02:34 PM
#46
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Mesquite,TX
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's much like that guy with the phantom top SC that did he car "cholo" style like it was a '64 Impala...that's just not right in my book. There are cars that look good with certain mods. That SC is not one of them.
Come on man quit player hating on other peoples taste.I bet some of thos "cholo" cars cost more thasn youre gs and youre house put together.And lowriding is international there is lowriders in Japan. White,Black Mexicans all have diffrent styles they prefer.There is all races in any kind of sport....
Camren shake them haters off.
and was up Rico and Txstyle keep on rollin.
Where yall crusing these days peeps hola!!!
LatinStyle_400
10-03-02, 05:41 PM
#47
Pole Position
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by lex400sc
You guys need to get off Manaray's back, he does raise a valid point. Mods performed for the sake of being different or unique, while not proving to have any benefit whatsoever (instead proving to be detrimental to performance, utility, and style) are considered RICE. Plain and simple. If it's a mod that is meant to "turn heads" because no one has seen it before, and it isn't an artful accent to the car's natural beauty, then it shouldn't be done. I think most here would agree wholeheartedly with that statement had it not been applied specifically to this thread.
Camren, I do commend you for reverting your trunk back to it's stock form in the end. You took the initiative to do an experimental mod and you didn't like it so you changed it back. Good for you! I'm just baffled as to why some members here are so stuck on the benign comment: "Kinda ricer, but interesting (ricer because it makes it LESS functional)". Read deeper and you'll find that Camren himself, as well as many others on this thread, indirectly acknowledged the exact same thing.
You guys need to get off Manaray's back, he does raise a valid point. Mods performed for the sake of being different or unique, while not proving to have any benefit whatsoever (instead proving to be detrimental to performance, utility, and style) are considered RICE. Plain and simple. If it's a mod that is meant to "turn heads" because no one has seen it before, and it isn't an artful accent to the car's natural beauty, then it shouldn't be done. I think most here would agree wholeheartedly with that statement had it not been applied specifically to this thread.
Camren, I do commend you for reverting your trunk back to it's stock form in the end. You took the initiative to do an experimental mod and you didn't like it so you changed it back. Good for you! I'm just baffled as to why some members here are so stuck on the benign comment: "Kinda ricer, but interesting (ricer because it makes it LESS functional)". Read deeper and you'll find that Camren himself, as well as many others on this thread, indirectly acknowledged the exact same thing.
It's subjective. This is purely your opinion, not truth. Who's on who's back?
Tim
10-03-02, 06:01 PM
#48
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by TimDimman
LOL...you're doing the same thing.
It's subjective. This is purely your opinion, not truth. Who's on who's back?
Tim
LOL...you're doing the same thing.
It's subjective. This is purely your opinion, not truth. Who's on who's back?
Tim
this thread is gonna end up CLOSED like all the others that have been CLOSED....
you can say anything.. and it wont effect em.... they'll just sit there.. think for an hour, write an essay including words and info they found on google and post it on here, trying to prove that your wrong and there right...
this is CL .. it wont change.. never has .. never will
Last edited by CamRen; 10-03-02 at 06:02 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
