Toyota UR-series V8 swap in a GS400
#16
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Honestly you can get a 2JZ into V8 territory if you want. Something along the lines of a 60mm billet ball bearing turbo w/ 1.15AR twin scroll back housing. Mate that to a 3400rpm stall torque converter. You will hole shot a lot of v8's out there. I'm actually in the works of building a IS300 to outrun everyone in the 1/8 mile where the domestics dominate.
Anyways, if the 2JZ isn't your cup of tea then your next best bet is to go with a 2UZ 4.7L and do a bore/stroker. The next option is the IS-F engine. Just run a standalone and it will be pretty smooth sailing from there on out.
Anyways, if the 2JZ isn't your cup of tea then your next best bet is to go with a 2UZ 4.7L and do a bore/stroker. The next option is the IS-F engine. Just run a standalone and it will be pretty smooth sailing from there on out.
#17
Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks everyone for the insight on the seemingly daunting task of an IS-F swap. It seems like running an hot rod Tundra 5.7 maybe the easier route.
^ Don't get me wrong, I love and truly respect 2jz swaps. It alone put Toyota on the map in the tuning world. I'm sure you will have zero problems beating up domestic drag racers. But I've been there done that. I'm looking for a newer power source that seems to be almost untapped.
I've read and done research on the 1uz-fe it's time is far gone and power numbers/capabilities are just semi impressive. But I'm a true believer in Toyota engineering, my current 2GS is @ 235k and counting. Runs better then any car I've owned and obviously lasted longer. Sure I could go LSx but could I say the same about reliability, most likely not.
So again 500+ hp before tearing into the motor. N/A or possible TRD factory supercharger configuration. Continuing the 98 Lexus GS legacy to be the fastest production sedan.
Yes I know it's not "production" per say. But by Euro standards it is. Case in point: AMG uses other merc powerplants with larger displacement, sometimes factory supercharges it and then call it an AMG. Which is sold at a MB showroom and called "Production." So I plan to apply the same theory. Call it GS-F...or GS570 maybe.
Honestly you can get a 2JZ into V8 territory if you want. Something along the lines of a 60mm billet ball bearing turbo w/ 1.15AR twin scroll back housing. Mate that to a 3400rpm stall torque converter. You will hole shot a lot of v8's out there. I'm actually in the works of building a IS300 to outrun everyone in the 1/8 mile where the domestics dominate.
Anyways, if the 2JZ isn't your cup of tea then your next best bet is to go with a 2UZ 4.7L and do a bore/stroker. The next option is the IS-F engine. Just run a standalone and it will be pretty smooth sailing from there on out.
Anyways, if the 2JZ isn't your cup of tea then your next best bet is to go with a 2UZ 4.7L and do a bore/stroker. The next option is the IS-F engine. Just run a standalone and it will be pretty smooth sailing from there on out.
I've read and done research on the 1uz-fe it's time is far gone and power numbers/capabilities are just semi impressive. But I'm a true believer in Toyota engineering, my current 2GS is @ 235k and counting. Runs better then any car I've owned and obviously lasted longer. Sure I could go LSx but could I say the same about reliability, most likely not.
So again 500+ hp before tearing into the motor. N/A or possible TRD factory supercharger configuration. Continuing the 98 Lexus GS legacy to be the fastest production sedan.
Yes I know it's not "production" per say. But by Euro standards it is. Case in point: AMG uses other merc powerplants with larger displacement, sometimes factory supercharges it and then call it an AMG. Which is sold at a MB showroom and called "Production." So I plan to apply the same theory. Call it GS-F...or GS570 maybe.
#18
ISF I think would prove a little more daunting than the Tundra motor. Trying to remember now, but is the ISF direct injection? Beyond that though, the VVTi on is electronically controlled versus your more typical OCV set. Maybe not an issue, but less 'history' to cheat from. Then there's the availability concerns.
Though back to the thought of reliable. I'd look into the history of Tundra's w/ the SC setups and rod longevity.
The UR's are pretty stout motors, but they're not invincible. One thing I'd also look into is how much power you can potentially make out of it. Keep in mind it's a good flowing 5.7L yet it doesn't make a boat load of power/ ie; it's full potential. There's so more to be uncorked from it even in NA form with some tuning...
Though back to the thought of reliable. I'd look into the history of Tundra's w/ the SC setups and rod longevity.
The UR's are pretty stout motors, but they're not invincible. One thing I'd also look into is how much power you can potentially make out of it. Keep in mind it's a good flowing 5.7L yet it doesn't make a boat load of power/ ie; it's full potential. There's so more to be uncorked from it even in NA form with some tuning...
#19
Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ISF I think would prove a little more daunting than the Tundra motor. Trying to remember now, but is the ISF direct injection? Beyond that though, the VVTi on is electronically controlled versus your more typical OCV set. Maybe not an issue, but less 'history' to cheat from. Then there's the availability concerns.
Though back to the thought of reliable. I'd look into the history of Tundra's w/ the SC setups and rod longevity.
The UR's are pretty stout motors, but they're not invincible. One thing I'd also look into is how much power you can potentially make out of it. Keep in mind it's a good flowing 5.7L yet it doesn't make a boat load of power/ ie; it's full potential. There's so more to be uncorked from it even in NA form with some tuning...
Though back to the thought of reliable. I'd look into the history of Tundra's w/ the SC setups and rod longevity.
The UR's are pretty stout motors, but they're not invincible. One thing I'd also look into is how much power you can potentially make out of it. Keep in mind it's a good flowing 5.7L yet it doesn't make a boat load of power/ ie; it's full potential. There's so more to be uncorked from it even in NA form with some tuning...
#20
Lead Lap
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is gonna be good either way. Everytime I come through "The Big Juice" I'm always amazed at what I see under the hood. 1J in mk3 Supra back in 99, then 1J in 5 series BMW and Maz B series truck in 2004, then 1J in 240sx in 2005 etc etc etc. Keep it coming......
#21
Lead Lap
iTrader: (4)
I got a stupid question...what will be the hp and tq numbers of a trd supercharged tundra motor. Reason being is because the guys that have superchargers on their rather stock GS4 engines are putting down anyware from 450 - 500hp (crank). Sounds like you're going through a lot of trouble just to be different IMHO. I dont see the benefit. Now a 2jz swap, different story because its been proven to make far more power than the aforementioned. The ISF motor produces what, 420 at the crank? Only way that would be worth while is if you throw in the ISF tranny as well since its so efficient. Good luck in whatever route you choose.
#22
Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
504hp and 550tq stock and factory backed. Power before cams, ported SC, headers, etc... I've yet to see a stock gs400 hit 500hp, most have rod failure @ 450. While the Tundra TRD SC swap being considered stock to the point its factory backed with a warranty, and 50 state legal.
#23
Lead Lap
iTrader: (4)
504hp and 550tq stock and factory backed. Power before cams, ported SC, headers, etc... I've yet to see a stock gs400 hit 500hp, most have rod failure @ 450. While the Tundra TRD SC swap being considered stock to the point its factory backed with a warranty, and 50 state legal.
#24
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Lol....warranty is overrated anyways
The main advantage of bigger V8 displacement(especially on a well designed engine) is that you can run a lot of HP on low boost with lesser octane fuel(staying on 93 octane instead of having to run alcohol or race fuel). My car on pump gas only makes around 550-600whp @ 19-20psi. On E85 I pushed it to over 800whp and it still probably had about another 100hp left in it if I went up to 35psi.
On the other hand a V8 for example a LS2 has 6.0L to work with. That's double the displacment of a 2JZ. If you build the engine for boost with lowered compression forged pistons, that engine can hit 800hp on pump gas at only around 15psi or so. Now with that in mind, the corvette engine is not the greatest engine in terms of efficiency. A lot of wasted flow in the head due to the 2 valve design. If they went with a V8 4 valve such as in the Toyota or new Ford 5.0(basically a Toyota engine in disguise, if you look around carefully there are a lot of Denso parts used on it lol!) engines, then there would be even more power to be found with boost.
The main advantage of bigger V8 displacement(especially on a well designed engine) is that you can run a lot of HP on low boost with lesser octane fuel(staying on 93 octane instead of having to run alcohol or race fuel). My car on pump gas only makes around 550-600whp @ 19-20psi. On E85 I pushed it to over 800whp and it still probably had about another 100hp left in it if I went up to 35psi.
On the other hand a V8 for example a LS2 has 6.0L to work with. That's double the displacment of a 2JZ. If you build the engine for boost with lowered compression forged pistons, that engine can hit 800hp on pump gas at only around 15psi or so. Now with that in mind, the corvette engine is not the greatest engine in terms of efficiency. A lot of wasted flow in the head due to the 2 valve design. If they went with a V8 4 valve such as in the Toyota or new Ford 5.0(basically a Toyota engine in disguise, if you look around carefully there are a lot of Denso parts used on it lol!) engines, then there would be even more power to be found with boost.
#25
The main advantage of bigger V8 displacement(especially on a well designed engine) is that you can run a lot of HP on low boost with lesser octane fuel(staying on 93 octane instead of having to run alcohol or race fuel). My car on pump gas only makes around 550-600whp @ 19-20psi. On E85 I pushed it to over 800whp and it still probably had about another 100hp left in it if I went up to 35psi.
Now with that said, yes I looked at building a twin turbo LS based setup but just couldn't find what I wanted for a good value with 4 doors.
#26
Lead Lap
iTrader: (4)
Lol....warranty is overrated anyways
The main advantage of bigger V8 displacement(especially on a well designed engine) is that you can run a lot of HP on low boost with lesser octane fuel(staying on 93 octane instead of having to run alcohol or race fuel). My car on pump gas only makes around 550-600whp @ 19-20psi. On E85 I pushed it to over 800whp and it still probably had about another 100hp left in it if I went up to 35psi.
On the other hand a V8 for example a LS2 has 6.0L to work with. That's double the displacment of a 2JZ. If you build the engine for boost with lowered compression forged pistons, that engine can hit 800hp on pump gas at only around 15psi or so. Now with that in mind, the corvette engine is not the greatest engine in terms of efficiency. A lot of wasted flow in the head due to the 2 valve design. If they went with a V8 4 valve such as in the Toyota or new Ford 5.0(basically a Toyota engine in disguise, if you look around carefully there are a lot of Denso parts used on it lol!) engines, then there would be even more power to be found with boost.
The main advantage of bigger V8 displacement(especially on a well designed engine) is that you can run a lot of HP on low boost with lesser octane fuel(staying on 93 octane instead of having to run alcohol or race fuel). My car on pump gas only makes around 550-600whp @ 19-20psi. On E85 I pushed it to over 800whp and it still probably had about another 100hp left in it if I went up to 35psi.
On the other hand a V8 for example a LS2 has 6.0L to work with. That's double the displacment of a 2JZ. If you build the engine for boost with lowered compression forged pistons, that engine can hit 800hp on pump gas at only around 15psi or so. Now with that in mind, the corvette engine is not the greatest engine in terms of efficiency. A lot of wasted flow in the head due to the 2 valve design. If they went with a V8 4 valve such as in the Toyota or new Ford 5.0(basically a Toyota engine in disguise, if you look around carefully there are a lot of Denso parts used on it lol!) engines, then there would be even more power to be found with boost.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post