GS - 3rd Gen (2006-2011) Discussion about the 2006+ model GS300, GS350, GS430, GS450H and GS460

From USA Today : Lexus GS falls short of Infiniti M (merged threads)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-05, 09:23 AM
  #91  
RON430
Lexus Fanatic
 
RON430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: California
Posts: 6,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In all honesty, forget the comparisons and just look at the GS. And also in all honesty, I am somewhat disappointed in the new GS. Having bought two GSs new over the last few years, there isn't anything in the new GS that makes me think I am improving much over what I currently have. If I think back to when the second gen came out, what put it on the map was the GS 400 and those 300hp - remember something wicked? It never was said to have a great suspension but it had those hp and superior build quality. I know back a while the overwhelming opinion on the board was that the next gen should be evolutionary rather then revolutionary but the new GS is just a big ho hum for me. And when they inevitably do improve the engine, Lexus pull your head out of your butt - the GS3 needs to have more hp then the Avalon for crissakes, the comments will be made that the GS will finally have the engines it should have had from the start. But the sales to the sport sedan buyer that they are losing now will never come back. OK, so maybe this is harsh but I can't say that the GS is on my list to replace my current cars. And when I get past the performance issues, there are other issues, I echo the trunk issues as well.

So, if I have these feelings with the new GS just on its own, when you get around to comparing it to other models, well, you know how that is going to go. But then, just like bimmer is doing with its current ads touting resale value, we will start talking about reliability and resale, because there is not much there to get excited about from the sport sedan side. The RL at least had a month or two where it was the viewed well because it was new but now it looks like the top of the heap in this niche will remain the 5 and maybe the E and maybe the M will be able to be compared favorably. And Audi and Acura and Jaguar and Cadillac and Lexus will be a step down. Sort of looks inevitable for now.
Old 03-26-05, 09:32 AM
  #92  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by LiquidBlue
My, we're sensitive... i said nothing about Infiniti selling sedans, i was speaking strictly about Lexus... let me restate: Lexus has a hard time selling sedans in comparison to MB and BMW.. That is factual. Now, if we're going to compare the Infiniti M specifically with the Lexus GS specifically, that is another issue, which I will address in another post.
If you don't start posting some facts to support your ridiculous claims, you will lose all credibility. The LS is the best selling large luxo sedan and the ES just sold over 70k units. If anything INFINITI has trouble selling ANYTHING! The G35 still cannot match ES or Tl sales.
Code:
INFINITI DIVISION SALES
			February	February	Monthly DSR	CYTD		CYTD		CYTD DSR
			2005		2004		% Change	2005		2004		% Change
Infiniti Division Total	9,787		9,512		2.9		18,500		18,904		1.9
I35			253		1,013		-75.0		664		2,003		-65.5
G35 Sedan		3,941		3,439		14.6		7,153		6,821		9.2
G35 Coupe		2,043		2,145		-4.8		3,704		4,238		-9.0
M45			225		173		30.1		315		381		-13.9
Q45			137		202		-32.2		245		379		-32.7
QX56			1,126		80		1,307.5		2,389		80		3,010.7
FX			2,062		2,459		-16.1		4,029		4,994		-16.0
Total Car		6,599		6,972		-5.3		12,081		13,822		-9.0
Total Truck		3,188		2,540		25.5		6,419		5,082		31.6
INFINITI HIGHLIGHTS

Sales for Infiniti were up 2.9 percent from last February with 9,787 units sold accounting for its best February

Calendar year-to-date sales are up 1.9 percent with 18,500 units soldHey bub, seems the QX56 SAVES Infiniti's butt. So pot is calling the kettle black.

January sales are here
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...hlight=januaryInfiniti sales up.5 %, due to the QX56 again

Lexus and no one will deny SUVs are SELLING. And to try to call out LEXUS, well you must be 8 years old. BECAUSE INFINTII NOW HAS THE FX and QX56!!! So it seems they are following Lexus in offering more than 1 SUV (the QX4 was a joke and is discontinued, not surprising).

Looking at the same links, MB is down like 14% AND THE ONLY THING SAVING BMW IS THE SUV X3!!!
Attached Thumbnails From USA Today : Lexus GS falls short of Infiniti M (merged threads)-owned2.gif  
Old 03-26-05, 09:35 AM
  #93  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by LiquidBlue
Well, you didn't say that the 3.0 V6 is better than the VQ, but you implied it by stating that the 3.0 is new and the VQ is not.. Newer is not always better, especially when the newer is underpowered compared with the rest of the competition. Having said that, although the M uses a 5 speed tranny and the GS uses a 6 speed, that does not make the 5 speed any worse of a transmission.. It certainly hasn't improved the GS300's 0-60 times in comparison to the M35. So, while the GS may be different from the M in these categories, i'm finding it difficult to draw conclusions on how the GS is superior than the M based on your criteria.
Please, your sounding like a child. The GS 300 0-60 time went from 7.8 to 6.8 seconds. I gave kudos to the VQ, what the heck do you want from me? Your missing the point, some people who think 0-60 is what will get them into heaven will buy the M35 and not care is 1 million VQ engines are year are sold. Some prefer the refinement and quiet of the 3.0 and don't really miss the power and are concerend with the total package., like a rarer engine.

Do your write for Motor Trend?
Old 03-26-05, 09:37 AM
  #94  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by flipside909
5 Stars

HONDA ACCORD
ACURA NSX
ACURA RL
GMC YUKON
HONDA ODYSSEY
INFINITI G35
LEXUS ES330
LEXUS GS300
LEXUS GS430
LEXUS GX470
LEXUS RX330
LEXUS SC430
MERCEDES-BENZ CLK CLASS
MINI COOPER
NISSAN FRONTIER
PORCHE 911 GT2
TACOMA PICKUP
TOYOTA 4RUNNER
TOYOTA CELICA
TOYOTA RAV4
TOYOTA SEQUOIA
TOYOTA TUNDRA
VOLVO C70
VOLVO S60
VOLVO V40
VOLVO V70



Hmmm where's that FX35/45 on the list? Not as good as the G35 is right, but not that great to make it on the 5 star list.

Only one Nissan and one Infiniti. Lexus and Toyota dominate the list itself. Not surprised.

I HAVE YET TO SEE ANY NISSAN FANBOY POST A LINK OR GRAPH OR ANYTHING TO SUPPORT THEIR OPINIONS!!
If you cannot debate without facts to support your claims, please, save yourself.
Old 03-26-05, 09:57 AM
  #95  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by genearch
No, Infiniti/Nissan IS NOT neck and neck....

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=156297
Top five

Brand Parent company Problems per 100 vehicles
Model year
2004 2003
Subaru Fuji 8 17
Honda Honda 9 10
Acura Honda 10 13
Toyota Toyota 10 11
Lexus Toyota 11 9

Bottom five

Nissan Nissan 19 14
BMW BMW 21 19
Volkswagen Volkswagen 23 19
Mercedes-Benz DaimlerChrysler 25 22
Lincoln Ford 26 31
According to CR, Nissan is one of the bottom 5 companies for reliablity. And Infintii is not on the top 5 list.

They are indeed not close to being neck and neck
Old 03-26-05, 10:08 AM
  #96  
doug_999
Lexus Champion
 
doug_999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 2,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ktiger
Am I on a BMW or MB forum?! Even today when you visit either of the afore mentioned forums you read statements like, "...Lexus still isn't a BMW or MB...". How in the world have we descend to this level.
No flip, THIS is the quote of the week.
Old 03-26-05, 10:16 AM
  #97  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by doug_999
No flip, THIS is the quote of the week.
I disagree 100%. We are here, with links and graphs and facts supporting our claims and disclaiming others. On the Benz forum, its a simple "Lexus sucks" from many people (not all) and ignorant statements like 'they are just Toyotas" and "they are all hooked up Camrys". .

Here, no one has said Infiniti is a bad brand nor has anyone stated the new M45 is not a worthy competitor. In countless threads, we have given appreciation, stated Infintii is turning it around some and we probably have more info on the M here than anywhere else. . But some of us are stating that we prefer the GS over the M and we are posting why. That is all.

In the USA today article, the guy basically states the M is superior b/c it is faster/more powerful and handles more sporty (with nothing to back the claim up) and dismisses everything else about the GS as "debatable". Guess what, the other "debatable" stuff is why people in this class buy these cars, not for 0-60 ratings.
Old 03-26-05, 10:24 AM
  #98  
doug_999
Lexus Champion
 
doug_999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 2,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
I disagree 100%. We are here, with links and graphs and facts supporting our claims and disclaiming others. On the Benz forum, its a simple "Lexus sucks" from many people (not all) and ignorant statements like 'they are just Toyotas" and "they are all hooked up Camrys". .

Here, no one has said Infiniti is a bad brand nor has anyone stated the new M45 is not a worthy competitor. In countless threads, we have given appreciation, stated Infintii is turning it around some and we probably have more info on the M here than anywhere else. . But some of us are stating that we prefer the GS over the M and we are posting why. That is all.

In the USA today article, the guy basically states the M is superior b/c it is faster/more powerful and handles more sporty (with nothing to back the claim up) and dismisses everything else about the GS as "debatable". Guess what, the other "debatable" stuff is why people in this class buy these cars, not for 0-60 ratings.
Mike, you have to admit, a lot of people on this board sound like Mercedes owners back in 1989. Back then Lexus came out with a superior product and what did you hear? Comments like and I quote from this thread with the makes replaced...
"Bottom line, the Lexus can win every comparison in the world and its a great car but its still no Mercedes"

The point is watch out - the bar is moving. People want more out of their cars than serene luxury - they want fun and the new GS does not have it. I've driven it, I like it - but as Ron points out, my current GS has almost everything it has - except that I can disable the stability control in mine
Old 03-26-05, 10:52 AM
  #99  
flipside909
Lexus Connoisseur
 
flipside909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 19,801
Received 533 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by doug_999
No flip, THIS is the quote of the week.
No Doug it's not. it's how you perceive it.
Old 03-26-05, 11:55 AM
  #100  
LiquidBlue
Rookie
 
LiquidBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RON430
In all honesty, forget the comparisons and just look at the GS. And also in all honesty, I am somewhat disappointed in the new GS. Having bought two GSs new over the last few years, there isn't anything in the new GS that makes me think I am improving much over what I currently have. If I think back to when the second gen came out, what put it on the map was the GS 400 and those 300hp - remember something wicked? It never was said to have a great suspension but it had those hp and superior build quality. I know back a while the overwhelming opinion on the board was that the next gen should be evolutionary rather then revolutionary but the new GS is just a big ho hum for me. And when they inevitably do improve the engine, Lexus pull your head out of your butt - the GS3 needs to have more hp then the Avalon for crissakes, the comments will be made that the GS will finally have the engines it should have had from the start. But the sales to the sport sedan buyer that they are losing now will never come back. OK, so maybe this is harsh but I can't say that the GS is on my list to replace my current cars. And when I get past the performance issues, there are other issues, I echo the trunk issues as well.

So, if I have these feelings with the new GS just on its own, when you get around to comparing it to other models, well, you know how that is going to go. But then, just like bimmer is doing with its current ads touting resale value, we will start talking about reliability and resale, because there is not much there to get excited about from the sport sedan side. The RL at least had a month or two where it was the viewed well because it was new but now it looks like the top of the heap in this niche will remain the 5 and maybe the E and maybe the M will be able to be compared favorably. And Audi and Acura and Jaguar and Cadillac and Lexus will be a step down. Sort of looks inevitable for now.

Lexus made a big mistake by keeping the generation two for as long as it did. The 3rd generation should have come out in 2003 as model year 2004, IMO.. Then, they could have refreshed the engines with the 3.5V6 and the 4.6V8 this year for model year 2006. I think most will agree that generation two overstayed its welcome longer than it should. And the general public agrees with that by looking at GS sales numbers for the past two years.. But because Lexus doesn't want to destroy the resale value of their generation two GS's (thus affecting their pre-owned sales), they had no choice but to offer the same engines initially for this 2006 GS.. They waited too long and they made a big mistake by doing so. I read somewhere that they were focusing on their SUV lineup for a few years, so the GS redesign took a back seat for awhile.. not good.
Old 03-26-05, 11:59 AM
  #101  
LiquidBlue
Rookie
 
LiquidBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
If you don't start posting some facts to support your ridiculous claims, you will lose all credibility. The LS is the best selling large luxo sedan and the ES just sold over 70k units. If anything INFINITI has trouble selling ANYTHING! The G35 still cannot match ES or Tl sales.
Code:
INFINITI DIVISION SALES
			February	February	Monthly DSR	CYTD		CYTD		CYTD DSR
			2005		2004		% Change	2005		2004		% Change
Infiniti Division Total	9,787		9,512		2.9		18,500		18,904		1.9
I35			253		1,013		-75.0		664		2,003		-65.5
G35 Sedan		3,941		3,439		14.6		7,153		6,821		9.2
G35 Coupe		2,043		2,145		-4.8		3,704		4,238		-9.0
M45			225		173		30.1		315		381		-13.9
Q45			137		202		-32.2		245		379		-32.7
QX56			1,126		80		1,307.5		2,389		80		3,010.7
FX			2,062		2,459		-16.1		4,029		4,994		-16.0
Total Car		6,599		6,972		-5.3		12,081		13,822		-9.0
Total Truck		3,188		2,540		25.5		6,419		5,082		31.6
INFINITI HIGHLIGHTS

Sales for Infiniti were up 2.9 percent from last February with 9,787 units sold accounting for its best February

Calendar year-to-date sales are up 1.9 percent with 18,500 units soldHey bub, seems the QX56 SAVES Infiniti's butt. So pot is calling the kettle black.

January sales are here
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...hlight=januaryInfiniti sales up.5 %, due to the QX56 again

Lexus and no one will deny SUVs are SELLING. And to try to call out LEXUS, well you must be 8 years old. BECAUSE INFINTII NOW HAS THE FX and QX56!!! So it seems they are following Lexus in offering more than 1 SUV (the QX4 was a joke and is discontinued, not surprising).

Looking at the same links, MB is down like 14% AND THE ONLY THING SAVING BMW IS THE SUV X3!!!

OK, except my post was regarding Lexus sedans vs. MB and BMW sedans. Again, for the 3rd time, i said nothng about Infiniti's sales. Go fetch the list where it compares Lexus sedan sales with MB and BMW sedan sales, then we'll talk.
Old 03-26-05, 12:03 PM
  #102  
LiquidBlue
Rookie
 
LiquidBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Please, your sounding like a child. The GS 300 0-60 time went from 7.8 to 6.8 seconds. I gave kudos to the VQ, what the heck do you want from me? Your missing the point, some people who think 0-60 is what will get them into heaven will buy the M35 and not care is 1 million VQ engines are year are sold. Some prefer the refinement and quiet of the 3.0 and don't really miss the power and are concerend with the total package., like a rarer engine.

Do your write for Motor Trend?
quiet?? From what I've heard from new owners, the new 3.0V6 is anything but quiet. I have read several posts on here where people are complaining of an annoying "ticking" noise coming from the engine. So, if you consider ticking noises "refined", then you are certainly in the minority.
Old 03-26-05, 12:09 PM
  #103  
LiquidBlue
Rookie
 
LiquidBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
I disagree 100%. We are here, with links and graphs and facts supporting our claims and disclaiming others. On the Benz forum, its a simple "Lexus sucks" from many people (not all) and ignorant statements like 'they are just Toyotas" and "they are all hooked up Camrys". .

Here, no one has said Infiniti is a bad brand nor has anyone stated the new M45 is not a worthy competitor. In countless threads, we have given appreciation, stated Infintii is turning it around some and we probably have more info on the M here than anywhere else. . But some of us are stating that we prefer the GS over the M and we are posting why. That is all.

In the USA today article, the guy basically states the M is superior b/c it is faster/more powerful and handles more sporty (with nothing to back the claim up) and dismisses everything else about the GS as "debatable". Guess what, the other "debatable" stuff is why people in this class buy these cars, not for 0-60 ratings.
Well apparently it does matter. For years, the 5 series has routinely beaten up on the GS in sales. It's those faster, more powerful, more sporty handling characteristics that the 5 series has over the GS that makes it a more attractive package for most people. It certainly is not because it's a more affordable choice. All i'm saying is that some people like more refined vehicles as their "luxury sports sedan", but most probably don't.
Old 03-26-05, 12:32 PM
  #104  
GlobeCLK
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
GlobeCLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: California
Posts: 7,402
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LiquidBlue
Lexus made a big mistake by keeping the generation two for as long as it did. The 3rd generation should have come out in 2003 as model year 2004, IMO.. Then, they could have refreshed the engines with the 3.5V6 and the 4.6V8 this year for model year 2006. I think most will agree that generation two overstayed its welcome longer than it should. And the general public agrees with that by looking at GS sales numbers for the past two years.. But because Lexus doesn't want to destroy the resale value of their generation two GS's (thus affecting their pre-owned sales), they had no choice but to offer the same engines initially for this 2006 GS.. They waited too long and they made a big mistake by doing so. I read somewhere that they were focusing on their SUV lineup for a few years, so the GS redesign took a back seat for awhile.. not good.

the 2nd Generation GS was aimed directly at the 5 series and E class. Hence they are on the same generation cycle. This is not a family sedan sector of the market (ala Camry and Accord) that needs a major redesign every 4~5 years. No need to introduce a new model unless they absolutely have to. In this market sector, only those cars that failed to start strong will need a redesign after only a few years.

As for the same engine, the new 5 series and E class were also using engines from the previous generation when they were introduced. It's not like they had no choice, but it was the smarter thing to do.
Old 03-26-05, 12:36 PM
  #105  
Gojirra99
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Gojirra99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 30,096
Received 219 Likes on 147 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GlobeCLK
As for the same engine, the new 5 series and E class were also using engines from the previous generation when they were introduced. It's not like they had no choice, but it was the smarter thing to do.
True for the 6 cylinders 530 & E320, but the 540 & E430 were upgraded to 545 & E500 when thet're introduced.


Quick Reply: From USA Today : Lexus GS falls short of Infiniti M (merged threads)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:26 AM.