Why buy GS over IS?
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Why buy GS over IS?
Question for you guys. Will be looking to get into a GS or IS but as I research, I have begun to notice very few if any differences in features/options between the GS and IS. Is there any reason besides size to buy the GS??
#2
Pole Position
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One word: Space
You can't fit anyone over 12 years old comfortably in the back seat (unless the front seat occupants happen to be midgets).
I think once the GS350, 450h & 460 are released, there will be a more apparent separation between the two vehicles.
You can't fit anyone over 12 years old comfortably in the back seat (unless the front seat occupants happen to be midgets).
I think once the GS350, 450h & 460 are released, there will be a more apparent separation between the two vehicles.
#3
As the IS is smaller and lighter, it is more agile and definitely leans more towards the sporty side. The GS is for someone who wants a larger, more mature version of the IS. That said, they both ooze luxury.
#5
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ca
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I chose my GS over the IS because it came with everything I wanted in the IS less the engine, and it was priced about the same as what I was going to get the IS for. I also didn't have to wait 3-4 months to get the IS.
Trending Topics
#9
Hi,
I chose the 3GS over the 2IS because the backseat on the IS is AWFUL. I had about that much
room on my old 98 Accord Coupe.
If you don't need a roomy backseat and don't care about the exclusivity factor I would just go with
the IS. I think it is more fun to drive. The GS300 is a pretty heavy car (especially the AWD). The
3GS AWD handles very well for a big car. Better than my 98 Accord and better than my 01GS430,
but worse than an IS in my opinion...
I chose the 3GS over the 2IS because the backseat on the IS is AWFUL. I had about that much
room on my old 98 Accord Coupe.
If you don't need a roomy backseat and don't care about the exclusivity factor I would just go with
the IS. I think it is more fun to drive. The GS300 is a pretty heavy car (especially the AWD). The
3GS AWD handles very well for a big car. Better than my 98 Accord and better than my 01GS430,
but worse than an IS in my opinion...
#10
Instructor
Thread Starter
Thanks for all the responses, indeed it is disturbing that the back seat is sooo small on the IS (it seems as if the Lexus engineers had a bet on how small they could make a back seat and still call the car a sedan). The GS would be much better in this respect I only wish that there were some added features we could claim over the IS guys. My dad is liking the LS but I have pretty much convinced him that the redesigned LS will be much better and the newly redesigned GS is a better bet. I do think we will wait for the 350 though, a 300 pulling that kind of weight is a concern. The 350's gas mileage shouldnt be much worse if at all once you consider that youd have to push the 300 to high RPMs just to get it to move like a 350 at lower RPMs thus eating around the same amount of gas in the end.
#12
Originally Posted by Nauticalx
Thanks for all the responses, indeed it is disturbing that the back seat is sooo small on the IS (it seems as if the Lexus engineers had a bet on how small they could make a back seat and still call the car a sedan). The GS would be much better in this respect I only wish that there were some added features we could claim over the IS guys. My dad is liking the LS but I have pretty much convinced him that the redesigned LS will be much better and the newly redesigned GS is a better bet. I do think we will wait for the 350 though, a 300 pulling that kind of weight is a concern. The 350's gas mileage shouldnt be much worse if at all once you consider that youd have to push the 300 to high RPMs just to get it to move like a 350 at lower RPMs thus eating around the same amount of gas in the end.
Hi Nauticalx,
I think waiting for the GS350 is a good move, but I would expect it to have much worse
fuel economy than the GS300.
My list of GS advantages would be
1) Room
2) Interior quality (IS looks a bit cheaper)
3) Refinement (especially the V8)
4) Exclusivity
The looks are a wash to me. There are pluses and minuses for both cars.
I would definitely not get the LS430 though, the LS460 proto looked too
awesome!
#13
Lexus Champion
Originally Posted by marshmallo
I would definitely not get the LS430 though, the LS460 proto looked too
awesome!
awesome!
#14
Super Moderator
Originally Posted by marshmallo
Hi Nauticalx,
I think waiting for the GS350 is a good move, but I would expect it to have much worsefuel economy than the GS300.
I think waiting for the GS350 is a good move, but I would expect it to have much worsefuel economy than the GS300.
#15
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exclusivity? LOL. With the exception of SC, all Lexus models are as common as BMW 3 series. Although the GS's interior is larger on paper (as Acura RL is to TL), subjectively the rear room did not feel significantly larger. I (5'8", 170lb) tried the backseat of both cars, and had my wife (5'4", 115lb) ride in the back while I test drove both. My wife, who had gone to the dealership with the intention of talking me into getting a GS, quickly changed her mind because the not only did the GS not feel roomier, the ride was harsher (felt like the suspension ran out of travel). Feature for feature, the IS has everything the GS does, save for the air suspension, and leather on the center console. The IS does have bixenon and mp3 capability that the GS not yet has. Yes, GS350/460 will reestablish the performance gap, as well as widen the price gap.
Last edited by jlin101; 12-08-05 at 12:50 PM.