Wait for my 08 GS or buy a CTS?
#46
You Guys In This Months Road And Track The Cts Lost To The G35. Its Beneath The Gs, And Its American, And Ugly As Hell!!! Oh An Did I Mention It Was American. Man Dont Get Me Started On Freakn American Cars. I Dont Care What The Ranking For Reliability This Year. Even A Broken Clock Is Right Twice A Day.
#47
You Guys In This Months Road And Track The Cts Lost To The G35. Its Beneath The Gs, And Its American, And Ugly As Hell!!! Oh An Did I Mention It Was American. Man Dont Get Me Started On Freakn American Cars. I Dont Care What The Ranking For Reliability This Year. Even A Broken Clock Is Right Twice A Day.
Seriously, though, what's an American car by your definition? When we traded our 93 Mazda MX6, built in Detroit along side Ford Probes, we got a 99 Acura TL made in Ohio. We traded that in for a 2004 RX330 made in Canada which for some time sat next to my 99 Camaro SS, also made in Canada. Then I got rid of the SS and bought a 2005 GTO made in Australia. The 460 is the first true Japanese care we have purchased.
If it makes you feel any better, I defend Lexus against the guys over at the GTO forum that think the IS350 is no match at all for the GTO (check R/T's numbers- both 13.5 in the 1/4, though the GTO traps higher) and that the GTO will trounce an LS-F (12.7/114 according to C/D).
At one point I owned both a Camaro and a Thunderbird. Talk about controversy- those Chevy/Ford rivalry guys are relentless.
I will say this, though. I refuse to buy anything but a good old American John Deere tractor to mow my lawn- as long as it has a Kawasaki twin cylinder engine- Briggs and Stratton engines I can't stand!!!! LOL
#49
#50
Bluetooth and other Electronics:
Bluetooth capability will be a dealer-installed accessory for 2008 CTS models. There’s a very simple “pack” that dealers install quickly and easily to enable this capability. We’re investigating a more-comprehensive approach for subsequent years if consumer interest continues to grow in Bluetooth. But the CTS absolutely can support it for 2008. Stay tuned on this front. Cadillac will have some really interesting features to discuss later this summer that will be in the CTS right off the bat.
http://cadillac.gmblogs.com/2007/04/answers.html
#51
I'm wondering if you've waited this long for the car that you wanted why does it really matter if you might have to wait a couple of more weeks for your GS? If you going to buy a car you should just wait and buy the one that is definitely your first choice!
Now, if you can't decide between the two just wait till the 08 GS comes out and test drive them both and then make your decision.
Now, if you can't decide between the two just wait till the 08 GS comes out and test drive them both and then make your decision.
#52
I am generally reluctant to buy any car in the first year of production as they tend to have bugs that need correction over the course of the year. I prefer to have all the TSBs applied. Demand is high for the CTS so some dealers are being silly and asking for MSRP. I did find a dealer that was willing to sell at $500 above invoice, but it required some work. Who knows what the market price will really be. Anyone remember the Chrysler 300 or PT Cruisers that were selling above list price? Also GM plays funny games with national and local advertising fees in their invoice price.
Depreciation is another unknown. I recall 3 of the top ten fastest depreciating cars on Forbes were Cadillac’s. Well, the CTS should fare better as prices have been firm and since the car is so much better than Cadillac of old, used demand and hence resale should be better, but who knows? If GM starts putting incentives on these, resale will tank.
The GS is in year 3 of production and is still a very nice and refined car. Most bugs should be corrected and retail price is stable. A new one (2008) can be had at a very small premium over invoice.
Even if I had a small preference for the CTS, overall, the GS for me was a “smarter” buy. I’m better off trading in a GS in a couple years for a bug free CTS rather than the other way around. Besides can one really go wrong buying a Lexus?
BTW, I made the same decision two months back when buying a CUV. I looked hard at a Buick Enclave, but they were on 12 week waits and dealers were asking for ADM. ADM on a mainstream CUV, no way! Bought a 2008 Acura MDX instead. GM needs to think about how they sell these vehicles. There are lot’s of employees and supplier discounts buying these vehicles on the boards. This means only a handful of cars on the lots that the dealers want MSRP or higher for. The employees and suppliers are captive buyers. They will buy GM. Me, on the other hand, as a lifetime import buyer, you just lost me for another buying cycle by trying to charge me full pop and rolling out your cars to employees at discount.
#53
I had already read about the 2008 CTS, but initially decided on the GS 350 because I did not like the Caddy dealer's 3 hour oil changes and the perceived reliabilty/depreciation issue everyone mentions. After further consideration, I decided against the GS because of the hard riding run flats and the car was much harder to get into and out of than the CTS for me (I am large framed). Then I made the mistake of driving the LS 460 and that was the end of the debate.
I drove the LS and LS600h at Taste of Lexus. The are about the quietest and smoothest cars I have driven. However, I want a bit more feedback and I am not ready for sensory deprivation yet while driving. In that class, I actually prefer the S550.
#54
If you are considering these two models you need to do yourself a favor and at least go and drive the Infiniti G35S and M35/45. You don't hear as much about the M in the press as you do other cars but it has been Consumer Reports best rated vehicle 4 years in a row and just came out on top against the MB E550, BMW 550i, Lexus GS450h.
The the computer system that comes in both the G and M are IMHO the best on the market and BMW definitely needs to take some notes... I am a little biased but I have been a long time toyota fan and never really a huge Nissan fan until this year and I have been very pleased to say the least. If you have any questions let me know as I have owned both, but at the very least go test drive the G and M...
The the computer system that comes in both the G and M are IMHO the best on the market and BMW definitely needs to take some notes... I am a little biased but I have been a long time toyota fan and never really a huge Nissan fan until this year and I have been very pleased to say the least. If you have any questions let me know as I have owned both, but at the very least go test drive the G and M...
#55
I agree with you on the run flats and the tight fit. The run flats can easily be changed and I think the cocoon design of the GS is deliberate. I am not full framed, so it's not as big a deal for me (bad pun intended)
I drove the LS and LS600h at Taste of Lexus. The are about the quietest and smoothest cars I have driven. However, I want a bit more feedback and I am not ready for sensory deprivation yet while driving. In that class, I actually prefer the S550.
I drove the LS and LS600h at Taste of Lexus. The are about the quietest and smoothest cars I have driven. However, I want a bit more feedback and I am not ready for sensory deprivation yet while driving. In that class, I actually prefer the S550.
I dunno- might have to trade the GTO in on an LS-F, but even the IS350 would be sweet and a lot cheaper. The 3.5 V6 in the GS and IS is a jewel too for sure. Anybody know if the IS is as hard to get into as the GS?? I feel in love with the old IS 300 but it was too damn narrow-I know they at least fixed that in the new IS, but have not driven one.
Last edited by chumsdad; 11-12-07 at 10:18 AM.
#56
If you are considering these two models you need to do yourself a favor and at least go and drive the Infiniti G35S and M35/45. You don't hear as much about the M in the press as you do other cars but it has been Consumer Reports best rated vehicle 4 years in a row and just came out on top against the MB E550, BMW 550i, Lexus GS450h.
The the computer system that comes in both the G and M are IMHO the best on the market and BMW definitely needs to take some notes... I am a little biased but I have been a long time toyota fan and never really a huge Nissan fan until this year and I have been very pleased to say the least. If you have any questions let me know as I have owned both, but at the very least go test drive the G and M...
The the computer system that comes in both the G and M are IMHO the best on the market and BMW definitely needs to take some notes... I am a little biased but I have been a long time toyota fan and never really a huge Nissan fan until this year and I have been very pleased to say the least. If you have any questions let me know as I have owned both, but at the very least go test drive the G and M...
I have driven both, the M35 on two test drives and had a new G35 as a loaner for a day.
The M is a nice car, one which I could be happy with. The interior is love, hate (I like it, my wife hates it) and the cabin is spacious. The ride is a bit stiff and cabin noise is much higher than what one would expect for the class, but the handling is very good. The five speed could use another gear and it is tuned for performance, not mileage. At the end of the day, there wasn't much to separate the M from the GS or CTS, but I wanted a bit more luxury and quiet ride for an every day driver.
As far as the G, it's a fun little car to throw around, but there are two big buts for me. The accelerator tip in is far too aggressive and hard to modulate in traffic and the interior is no where comparable to the CTS, M or GS. Otherwise a fine car.
#57
I dunno- might have to trade the GTO in on an LS-F, but even the IS350 would be sweet and a lot cheaper. The 3.5 V6 in the GS and IS is a jewel too for sure. Anybody know if the IS is as hard to get into as the GS?? I feel in love with the old IS 300 but it was too damn narrow-I know they at least fixed that in the new IS, but have not driven one.
#58
I have driven both, the M35 on two test drives and had a new G35 as a loaner for a day.
The M is a nice car, one which I could be happy with. The interior is love, hate (I like it, my wife hates it) and the cabin is spacious. The ride is a bit stiff and cabin noise is much higher than what one would expect for the class, but the handling is very good. The five speed could use another gear and it is tuned for performance, not mileage. At the end of the day, there wasn't much to separate the M from the GS or CTS, but I wanted a bit more luxury and quiet ride for an every day driver.
As far as the G, it's a fun little car to throw around, but there are two big buts for me. The accelerator tip in is far too aggressive and hard to modulate in traffic and the interior is no where comparable to the CTS, M or GS. Otherwise a fine car.
The M is a nice car, one which I could be happy with. The interior is love, hate (I like it, my wife hates it) and the cabin is spacious. The ride is a bit stiff and cabin noise is much higher than what one would expect for the class, but the handling is very good. The five speed could use another gear and it is tuned for performance, not mileage. At the end of the day, there wasn't much to separate the M from the GS or CTS, but I wanted a bit more luxury and quiet ride for an every day driver.
As far as the G, it's a fun little car to throw around, but there are two big buts for me. The accelerator tip in is far too aggressive and hard to modulate in traffic and the interior is no where comparable to the CTS, M or GS. Otherwise a fine car.