GS - 4th Gen (2013-2020) Discussion about the 2013 and up GS models

4GS mega thread (UPDATED; preview drives, specs, more interior pics)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-10, 08:56 PM
  #856  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by UDel
I had a very similar experience a couple years ago. I had always thought Audi's had class leading interiors from pics and reviews and liked many of the older ones even though I never spent much time in them. I went to a auto show and spent some time sitting in various Audi's and examining the interiors and was shocked and disappointed with the interiors in their design and quality. They did not feel any higher in quality or were better looking then most of the Lexus or Acura interiors I was familiar with although the quality of materials in the Audi's was noticeably better then the Mercedes vehicles at the show. When sitting in the Audi's and pressing buttons they did not give a satisfying feedback, felt like cheap hard plastic, and give this annoying cheap sounding loud click. The A6 interior was very plain to me and not a very good design especially with all that flat featureless plastic around the gauges and upper center dash area. The leather felt rough and unimpressive. I later sat in a Acura RL, MDX, and Lexus LS460 and thought they had much better designs, better quality, and more satisfying precise tactile feedback when operating controls. The A8 was the only Audi interior I was impressed with quality and design wise.
Yeah but you think the 2nd gen TL has a fantastic interior (it is as well put together as a Hyundai Excel)so we have to take the opinion with a grain of salt.

The A6 has a fantastic interior. It is GERMAN in design, so it seems colder and more businesslike than Japanese designs.

It is very well built, I feel it was more solid than my 2GS and 3GS.

FYI no one considers Acura anywhere near the best interiors. They are good but not on Lexus or Audi levels.
 
Old 10-07-10, 08:59 PM
  #857  
syzygy
Lexus Champion
 
syzygy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The only thing the 2nd gen Acura TL really does well is exterior aesthetics. The 2nd gen TL/TL-S is a flat out good looking car, period. Other than that, it was wrong wheel drive and its interior left a lot to be desired.

The newest TL is absolutely abysmal on the exterior front, but then again I admit that this is purely subjective.
syzygy is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 12:05 AM
  #858  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,671
Received 190 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UDel
The GS350 was much quicker then the GS430 and about the same as the GS460 so having the v6 as the top engine for regular GSs is not too bad as it is still going to be very quick.
i have gs350, and it's not a slow car by any means. but saying it's very quick and can "replace" v8, sorry but i can't agree at all and it's not even close.

first, it's quick if you go from stop to 60 and that's about it. anything above that, and especially on at speed pick up, the v8 is going to destroy the v6. whenever i try to pick up speed from 60mph i can feel the car is working hard. v8 with the tq will have no problem keep on pulling

and that's the other point of v8, the smoothness and quietness. i can honestly say the v6 works harder and a bit louder when working, whereas the v8 is smoother and less effortless.

there is no replacement for displacement, that still holds
rominl is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 12:20 AM
  #859  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,671
Received 190 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mikesm
I was kidding! I may have issues with Lexus, but have always been impressed with the materials they use in the cabin. So when you said it would be us away, I was trying to see if you were talking about design elements and materials or electronics...
ah sorry about that. similar topic happened before and it went into a heated talk until i had to go through tons of post to find the pic to prove it's real. i almost had to do it again
rominl is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 01:18 AM
  #860  
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
 
TRDFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rominl
i am not sure if gsf design started 4-5 yrs ago? even for the isf, it wasn't until 2is was pretty much done and then just 2 people in the lab working. that was around 2005-06 time frame. if at that time there were already gsf project started, then the isf should have been able to leverage off much more.

and for the v10, the lfa engine i am sure would be on the more gas efficient side. but knowing how it works and also the high rev, i would really want to see how reality sets in with the EPA numbers (i think 14/20?). just like the v10 in the m5, EPA numbers and reality is very different. in reality the high rev engine eats up on gas much worse.

plus with the future gas mileage requirement, with the gsf using v10, then other lexus lineup will need to do more to help balance things out
Well I was being generous with that timeframe. If GSF development started say only 2-3 years ago, that that's an even bigger gap between the start of LFA V10 development and GSF development. That would mean even more time where Toyota learned things from the LFA V10 and from F1 participation to include in the GSF engine.

You're right, reality is different, but it all depends how you drive. If you stop-light race an LFA I'm sure you can really bring down the fuel economy, but during regular driving it should be fairly efficient for the power it makes.

Originally Posted by batman75
The benefits of turbos are striking.

Dinan just released their stage 1 upgrade for the 550i. $3000 upgrade boosts output from 400hp to 495hp, and from 450 to 570 lb feet.
The drawbacks are also striking. Turbos add complexity and extra maintenance to an engine. These are inescapable facts. Turbo engines also are generally not as reliable as naturally aspirated engines. Yes there are exceptions, but it's not the norm. There is also of course reduced throttle modulation and throttle response on a turbo engine compared to a naturally aspirated engine.

However, if you start talking about something like electric-assist turbos, then some of the drawbacks of conventional turbo engines are solved.
TRDFantasy is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 01:43 AM
  #861  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,910
Received 156 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fizzboy7
I'm shocked to hear your A6 interior comments. That would be the first negative view of an Audi interior I've come across in a long long time. Audi interiors are known to use some of the best materials in the industry. Are you sure you just did not like the styling of the interior? Because that I would agree with. The arch over the gauges and top leading edge of the dash looks old-fashioned to me. Also, Audi leather is built tougher and more durable than Lexus leather. It doesn't feel as soft or look as plush, but it lasts a long time.
i know how it rates, thats why I was disappointed in it . I thought it would be a bit above Lexus, but it really felt one class below... everyone who compared our two cars felt the same.

Keep in mind that with Audi you can pick different leathers, and this one definitely did not look upscale to me. Also interior was easily scratched. It was fine car, but from all the german mag reviews, it was supposed to blow me away. I was also suprised with the harsh ride, it felt like Toyota and not premium car... and in tests you read how Lexus is harsh and Audi is smooth, it is not true at all, my GS is considerably smoother car... Also transmission shifted harder as well .

So at the end, except for HUGE trunk, there is no way I would get A6... it feels to me (3 year owner of GS) as step below... for similar price, I can get GS450h with everything in it.


Next is 530xd, maybe wagon version. I kind of dont want the GS since I had it for 3 years and it is time to change anyway, plus I want AWD and cant get it here.
spwolf is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 03:43 AM
  #862  
Vladi
Pole Position
 
Vladi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
i know how it rates, thats why I was disappointed in it . I thought it would be a bit above Lexus, but it really felt one class below... everyone who compared our two cars felt the same.

Keep in mind that with Audi you can pick different leathers, and this one definitely did not look upscale to me. Also interior was easily scratched. It was fine car, but from all the german mag reviews, it was supposed to blow me away. I was also suprised with the harsh ride, it felt like Toyota and not premium car... and in tests you read how Lexus is harsh and Audi is smooth, it is not true at all, my GS is considerably smoother car... Also transmission shifted harder as well .

So at the end, except for HUGE trunk, there is no way I would get A6... it feels to me (3 year owner of GS) as step below... for similar price, I can get GS450h with everything in it.


Next is 530xd, maybe wagon version. I kind of dont want the GS since I had it for 3 years and it is time to change anyway, plus I want AWD and cant get it here.
Don't know if you went to see a brand new one or used one but from my experiehnce plastic buttons and ***** tend to go flimsy after some use. Not to mention that my radio **** went dead after a year.
Vladi is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 04:46 AM
  #863  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,910
Received 156 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vladi
Don't know if you went to see a brand new one or used one but from my experiehnce plastic buttons and ***** tend to go flimsy after some use. Not to mention that my radio **** went dead after a year.
it is 2 year old facelifted model, and my GS is 3 years old now, so thats what I am comparing it to ... I am looking for 2 year old models myself because they drop more than 50% in value in germany these days, which makes them good buys (both A6 and 530xd).
spwolf is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 06:42 AM
  #864  
situman
Pole Position
 
situman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,444
Received 166 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Z
Sounds perfect to ME!!! There is no reason to put a V8 variant in the GSF..

It will be a slightly toned down version of the LFA V-10 motor...

It will also be a $75-$80K solution to get some of that LFA hp..

The GS-F renderings are already on the drawing tables and we will see it within 2 years of this post that I am typing right now.


Joe Z
The LFA engine in a GS just doesnt make sense to me especially if it is a smaller and detuned version to around 450hp. The germans will blow the doors off the thing and torque will be almost nonexistant, relatively at least. Besides how happy would LFA owners be when a GS has the same or similar engine as their 375k puppy?
situman is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 07:14 AM
  #865  
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
MR_F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mister Two
The GS350 is about as quick as the GS460 only because the GS460's V8 was deprived of its 380hp potential. If the 550i even with a 408hp twin-turbo V8 needs 5 seconds to go from 0 to 60, I'm fairly sure that the GS can at least match that if given a proper V8 without even needing forced induction. The GS-F can then kick it up another notch by adding a supercharger and some lightness treatments.
Sounds about correct. I fully endorse this post.

Ideally for me, I would love to see;
a 3650lb/330hp GS350
a 3750lb/420hp GS460
a 3859lb/540hp GS F

A GSh with Li batteries and impressive fuel economy would fall ideally between the 350 and 460. Personally, I don't think Lexus would make the GS to come close to those weight targets, but I'd love to be proven wrong.

I'm intruiged about the rumored "e-diff", I really want to see the GS make a statement like the 2ng gen, ISF and LFA have.

Originally Posted by TF109B
Like I said before, Motortrend seems to think that Lexus is going to keep the weight down, and if that's the case there's no need for absurd amounts of power. The LFA has 552hp, but it can better cars with over 600hp around race tracks. It's not the lightest car in the woods but it's all about dynamics. Lexus is onto something and I bet the GS-F and regular GS will be much better in that sense than previous cars. If what MT says is true about this torque vectoring technology, I bet it'll be quite the performer. I'm betting Lexus has a few tricks up their sleeve. The IS-F is as fast as the M3, why would the GS-F not be as fast as the M5?
As I said before, motortrend is usually full of it and there is scant chance that the next GS, GS F in particular, is going to weigh less than this generation's IS. I don't get caught up in peak HP numbers, but 450 hp vs a 550hp M5/RS6/E AMG just isn't going to cut it, at all. It'd have to be like 3300lbs to meet the p/w ratio of the class. Yes, Lexus does need to come to the ballpark lighter, and more dynamically balanced than the competition, but it also needs to bring along at least 520hp with it, 540 If it is more than 3800lbs.
MR_F1 is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 07:53 AM
  #866  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,910
Received 156 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

li-ons will do what, shave 40lbs and add $500-$1500 to the cost? Do you really want to pay for that?
spwolf is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 08:25 AM
  #867  
MPLexus301
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
MPLexus301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Friend Zone
Posts: 9,044
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Not to mention that they will probably also provide superior gas mileage to what is being achieved currently, so yes, I think it's worth it.
MPLexus301 is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 08:37 AM
  #868  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

MR_F1 brings up weight. IF and its a big IF Lexus can hold the weight down or even lose weight while gaining the RWD torque vectoring system and steering improves, they could get a magazine darling.

The GS and 5 series used to be lightest in class by far. The new 5 is now based off the bigger heavier 7 so the 5 series is now 3900-4550 lbs! Its heavier than a Panamera in many cases.

Currently the GS 450h weighs 4100lbs (which is accurate as I weighed it at the track and got 4120) which is now lighter than most new V-8 cars in its class.

We have heard rumors the GS isn't growing in size but that would be hard to do since every car in this class now has grown in width, height and length. It would be hard for Lexus to not grow the GS again (the 3GS is only .2 inches longer than the 2GS).
 
Old 10-08-10, 08:48 AM
  #869  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,671
Received 190 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
MR_F1 brings up weight. IF and its a big IF Lexus can hold the weight down or even lose weight while gaining the RWD torque vectoring system and steering improves, they could get a magazine darling.

The GS and 5 series used to be lightest in class by far. The new 5 is now based off the bigger heavier 7 so the 5 series is now 3900-4550 lbs! Its heavier than a Panamera in many cases.

Currently the GS 450h weighs 4100lbs (which is accurate as I weighed it at the track and got 4120) which is now lighter than most new V-8 cars in its class.

We have heard rumors the GS isn't growing in size but that would be hard to do since every car in this class now has grown in width, height and length. It would be hard for Lexus to not grow the GS again (the 3GS is only .2 inches longer than the 2GS).
agree with everything mike said.

it would be super awesome to see drop in weight, though my gut feeling says increase
rominl is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 11:17 AM
  #870  
TF109B
Lexus Champion
 
TF109B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,266
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Well, if the next IS is based off the next GS, I'm sure keeping weight down in the GS will help keep the weight down in the IS. The weight is a lot of sound deadening materials as well. Lexus is usually among the quietest in it's class. Motortred has been close on plenty of things before. They usually don't say things that are way off the mark, and there's nothing to indicate their statements about the next GS are anything different than mostly on point. The torque vectoring is what were hearing, and let me remind you that Motortrend said this earlier in the year. So they were one of the first to state this, and now it's accepted as pretty much a given on the GS-F, maybe even the regular GS. It's not too hard to keep weight down if the new car isn't going to grow in size. The dimensions are said to be similar, making better use of the space it has. It will grow it width though, we can see this from spy shots of the test mule. Increased track size can help with cornering. I don't see anything wrong with what MT is reporting. Everything has to be taken with a grain of salt but they seem pretty accurate to me.
TF109B is offline  


Quick Reply: 4GS mega thread (UPDATED; preview drives, specs, more interior pics)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:02 AM.