GS - 4th Gen (2013-2020) Discussion about the 2013 and up GS models

config questions on avs, etc. and comment on adaptive cruise...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-12, 09:02 PM
  #16  
Outrage
Lead Lap
 
Outrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think most of the perceived ride/handling differences between the F Sport and Luxury trim levels are due to the lower profile tires found on the F Sport. Personally, I didn't notice much of a difference in capability or feel between the two trim levels.
Old 06-16-12, 09:05 PM
  #17  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,695
Received 2,397 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Default

^^ but ldh (rear steer) isn't automatically a part of f-sport so your post adds to the confusion i think
Old 06-16-12, 09:07 PM
  #18  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,695
Received 2,397 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rominl
part numbers don't lie.

and personally i doubt very much if the dampenings are different, again because of the same parts. i doubt it's like aftermarket coilovers where you got 16 clicks or so. it's probably just two settings, one or another.
Again, parts can be identical and software can make cars handle differently
Old 06-16-12, 09:14 PM
  #19  
Outrage
Lead Lap
 
Outrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
^^ but ldh (rear steer) isn't automatically a part of f-sport so your post adds to the confusion i think
Dynamic Rear Steering isn't available on the AWD models; which is what I drove. The AWD models sit a little higher so I assume they use different springs than the RWD models. That adds even more variables to the equation.
Old 06-16-12, 10:16 PM
  #20  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,671
Received 190 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nantang
That implies that a non-F-Sport could be given the same handling fairly easily with minimal expense, provided it had Sport +.
what i can think of would be the brakes and the wheels

Originally Posted by Outrage
I think most of the perceived ride/handling differences between the F Sport and Luxury trim levels are due to the lower profile tires found on the F Sport. Personally, I didn't notice much of a difference in capability or feel between the two trim levels.
19" with lower profile tires can make quite some difference. plus the brakes, the fsport has bigger brakes i think (can't remember if only fsport has 2 piece rotors which are lighter).

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
Again, parts can be identical and software can make cars handle differently
and until there is actual proof saying software is doing anything different, which we have yet to see any, i cannot believe such a case. both called S+, and due to cost i doubt the shocks have more than 2 settings. if the shocks have more than 2 settings and someone look at the strut tower motor and see that the fsport s+ turns more than the luxury, then i believe so
Old 06-17-12, 04:17 AM
  #21  
flipside909
Lexus Connoisseur
 
flipside909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 19,801
Received 533 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lexesty72
F Sport should come with F Sport lowering spring...
Yeah that would be cool. At least a 10mm drop just like the Nurburgring Package LFA vs. the standard.

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
perhaps it's just a software difference, that f-sport modes use the dampers a little more aggressively (stiffly) than luxury, but it's the same actual suspension components.
Theoretically, if the F Sport and the Luxury package AVS dampers were the same, it could be possible that the AVS controller can turn the damper pin a few turns further to be stiffer. From what I was told about the GS suspension, the F Sport version was tuned heavier for both spring and shock. I'm only going by what Lexus has shared with us. Let me see if I can get a more definitive answer. The F Sport does ride on 19's with better tires and lower profiles. The Luxury package rides on 18's with quiet all season tires but it does handle nicely, definitely an improvement over last generation.

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
and one more... i don't think i saw the rear steer option anywhere on lexus' site? if it's there, is it available for the gs450h too?
Rear Steering package from what I heard was that it would be discontinued. So far that seems to hold true as most of the GS F Sport models sold here in the Western Area have been packaged as F Sport w/Mark Levinson. When GS first launched a few months ago, ML was not available with F Sport and a handful of the F Sport models came with LDH w/Dynamic Rear Steer.

Last edited by flipside909; 06-17-12 at 04:41 AM.
Old 06-17-12, 04:59 AM
  #22  
motohide
Pole Position
 
motohide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

My school of thought is that when suspensions systems work well, and fits the dynamic character of the vehicle, that one doesn't need much 'tuning' beyond that. When I setup race cars, I use a widely adjustable suspension, but once I get a good solid setup, I don't really screw with anything too much unless the venue or conditions are severely different like wet conditions, or between large gaps in tire adhesion like concrete track vs asphalt.

Most of the variables can be fine tuned well enough by first, becoming a more skilled driver, and two, adjusting more basic but larger variable like stuff in the trunk, or fuel levels that offsets the weight balance and loading of suspension, or things like tire pressures.

Equally, I setup most street cars to be a bit more dynamically capable, sacrificing noise of tires or damper/spring tuning. And again, once I find something I like, I don't really touch the adjustments, or alignments. I just put in seat time, and hone my driving to compensate for lack of skills to do whatever I needed to do and failed in the past.

The 4th Lexus GS sedan standard model may be a bit soft on the raceway, but I have found that the dynamic feedback and response to driver inputs are really well sorted. So much so that I felt that the F-Sport package cars simply felt stiffer, but not necessarily better.
It feels snappy at initial inputs, but really doesn't gain much in terms of composure that is already excellent.

So it almost feels like what the engineers were after was a flavoring of the feedback to the driver, and not higher performance thresholds or numbers at the expense of general dynamic character, that is fun to drive.
Old 06-17-12, 10:58 AM
  #23  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,695
Received 2,397 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by flipside909
Rear Steering package from what I heard was that it would be discontinued.


this, and no power fold mirrors, no power close trunk, no 450h f-sport, no f-sport fogs, seems like lexus u.s. is trying everything to disappoint customers.

there might be another reason, which is, given the competitive pricing in the u.s., it might be more profitable for lexus to sell vehicles elsewhere.
Old 06-17-12, 04:24 PM
  #24  
motohide
Pole Position
 
motohide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna


this, and no power fold mirrors, no power close trunk, no 450h f-sport, no f-sport fogs, seems like lexus u.s. is trying everything to disappoint customers.

there might be another reason, which is, given the competitive pricing in the u.s., it might be more profitable for lexus to sell vehicles elsewhere.
Those may all be factors too, but I think what is at the core theme of making cars at Toyota in general, seems to be shifting for making great core attributes on each car, and to do with less gimmicks that was short term marketing draw features, and spending more time on the core necessities that make each car more refined as an automobile. And adding value to those who can appreciate automobiles in a more refined sense than bells and whistles.

Having said that, Lexus is a brand with prominent history of great bells and whistles, so it might be something which may feel a bit alienating at times. But in the case of the GS350, losing the rear wheel steer, might be one of these core focus driven move. To have a capable responsive chassis that is void of wonders at low speeds, and give more of a true dynamic stability at higher limits where driver interactions can really be at one with the excellent unibody and sub-components.

that's my guess...
Old 06-19-12, 08:47 AM
  #25  
flipside909
Lexus Connoisseur
 
flipside909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 19,801
Received 533 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna


this, and no power fold mirrors, no power close trunk, no 450h f-sport, no f-sport fogs, seems like lexus u.s. is trying everything to disappoint customers.

there might be another reason, which is, given the competitive pricing in the u.s., it might be more profitable for lexus to sell vehicles elsewhere.
Yeah all the cool features are available outside of the US and Canadian market. It would be nice to have all the luxuries of the GS because I do like to have those options on my car. I had power folding mirrors on my 07 GS, although they were not the auto power folding, they were still nice to have.
Old 06-19-12, 10:49 AM
  #26  
flipside909
Lexus Connoisseur
 
flipside909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 19,801
Received 533 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
perhaps it's just a software difference, that f-sport modes use the dampers a little more aggressively (stiffly) than luxury, but it's the same actual suspension components.

Okay so far this is what I have been able to get clarification on. The AVS shock units are the same for F Sport and Luxury. They are tuned differently meaning the F Sport dampening is tighter than Luxury for obvious reasons. They are 20 way adjustable shock dampers made by KYB but they are preset for one specific dampening rate for their respective applications. KYB historically has been the OE shock supplier for Toyota since Gen 1 GS. As for actual dampening rates and values, I am still getting more clarification on that.

KYB is the OE shock supplier for LFA.
Old 06-20-12, 02:01 AM
  #27  
natnut
Pole Position
 
natnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,602
Received 88 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Outrage
Dynamic Rear Steering isn't available on the AWD models; which is what I drove. The AWD models sit a little higher so I assume they use different springs than the RWD models. That adds even more variables to the equation.

Here's a poster who owned and drives 2 RWD F-Sports, one with DRS and one without. Here's his input comparing DRS F-Sport vs nonDRS F-Sport :

The steering response is much better, at high speed it is more agile, more confident, I can make better U-TURN and it's almost like a AWD car. I've only logged less than 100 miles and I have not gone over 120mph yet.


https://www.clublexus.com/forums/7278561-post13.html
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sizmec
CT 200h Model (2011-2017)
0
05-05-18 09:07 AM
vtp86
GS - 4th Gen (2013-2020)
31
02-16-17 07:26 AM
2eXceL
CT 200h Model (2011-2017)
17
03-10-14 12:04 PM
AdvanSLF
IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present)
13
12-15-13 01:48 PM



Quick Reply: config questions on avs, etc. and comment on adaptive cruise...



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:22 PM.