GS - 4th Gen (2013-2020) Discussion about the 2013 and up GS models

FINALLY! Refresh 2016 GS pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-15, 01:41 PM
  #181  
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
RNM GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 7,210
Received 68 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by metrathon
I don't know about Lexus tuning, I assumed was as easy as with BMW and Audi. I don't understand why a turbo by Lexus would be different.

Not sure if you extensively drove a modern turbo engine, but the difference is day and night. A 2.0T turbo can almost outrun a 3.5 NA. But let's not talk about racing: day to day driving is so . much . easier with a turbo engine. My 328i pulls at 1,800 RPM the way the GS 350 pulls at 4,500 RPM.

I'm not starting a turbo vs NA debate, to each its own. But from a gas mileage perspective, weight reduction, daily livability, and tuning potential, there's no contest.
Simple answer - Lexus ECUs are very hard to crack and nobody had done it with any amount of success, hence why Lexus is so unpopular with tuners.

I would be shocked if this will change with turbo motors.
Therefore dont expect any crazy HP gains with a flash like u would get with BMW.

There are M4s running over 400hp at the wheels with a simple ECU flash.....
Old 08-17-15, 01:52 PM
  #182  
metrathon
Pole Position
 
metrathon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RNM GS3
Simple answer - Lexus ECUs are very hard to crack and nobody had done it with any amount of success, hence why Lexus is so unpopular with tuners
Interesting, I didn't know that.
Old 08-17-15, 02:22 PM
  #183  
peteharvey
Lead Lap
 
peteharvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ca
Posts: 4,276
Received 464 Likes on 308 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW15LS
...
I've had time to let the design settle, I was away for the weekend...I don't like it.
I think the 2016 4.5GS Refresh is ok, but I just don't have any motivation to purchase the front bumper, nor grill, nor headlight, nor tail lights.

When they style well, I always want to purchase the refreshed parts, or purchase the whole car.

However, that said, the Refresh is okay; I'd buy it if I didn't already have the original 4GS.
Old 08-17-15, 02:27 PM
  #184  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,463
Received 1,615 Likes on 1,030 Posts
Default

Anyone notice the minor fuel mileage improvement on the RWD models?

Also a bit weird that the 2016 GS350 RWD F Sport has different EPA ratings than the RWD non F Sport, actually taking a 1 mpg hit over the 2015.

For the 2GR-FKS (2016):

RWD 20/29/23
RWD F Sport 19/28/22
AWD 19/27/22

Compare this to the 2GR-FSE (2015):

RWD 19/29/23
AWD 19/27/22

I believe the difference in the 2GR-FSE and the 2GR-FKS would be the ability to use the Atkinson cycle on the 2GR-FKS. I need to spend more time studying this.

Sources:

2015:

http://pressroom.lexus.com/releases/...specs.download

2016:

http://pressroom.lexus.com/releases/...specs.download
Old 08-17-15, 02:29 PM
  #185  
ItzFilyO
Lexus Test Driver
 
ItzFilyO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: California
Posts: 5,813
Received 1,047 Likes on 662 Posts
Default

2016 uses 2GR FKS? What is that?

Yup! the 200t is heavier than the 350. 3805 lbs vs. 3726 lbs for the 350. How is that even possible?

Last edited by ItzFilyO; 08-17-15 at 02:32 PM.
Old 08-17-15, 02:31 PM
  #186  
tknx
Intermediate
 
tknx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I took a while to decide. I realized that it comes down to the fact that Lexus management really needs to start being smarter. The spindle grill is fine for sports models (IS, GS, RC, LC)... But is a disaster on the luxury and SUV models. A different treatment would be worthwhile there.

Specific thoughts on details:

1. The grill does not work on the normal trim. F-sport - sure - because it resembles an open maw instead of being protuberant in the same way.

2. The DRLs are no surprise, but if you look at what Audi and MB are doing, individual little LEDs are out - instead they are using a much more modern even type of lighting - and it looks a lot better.

3. Mostly clear tails? Really? Is this 2005?

4. And the introduction of the 200t? All bad, all the way. Just cheapens the brand and strikes me as a me-too type move.
Old 08-17-15, 02:43 PM
  #187  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,463
Received 1,615 Likes on 1,030 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ItzFilyO
2016 uses 2GR FKS? What is that?

Yup! the 200t is heavier than the 350. 3805 lbs vs. 3726 lbs for the 350. How is that even possible?
The 2GR-FKS seems to be the same as the FSE, but with the ability to use the Atkinson cycle. Note that the new Tacoma is also using the 2GR-FKS.

As for weight, I cannot explain that. Especially since the IS200t weights less than the IS350. Something doesn't add up. I'm missing a piece of the puzzle.

They've also noted a 1.4 inch increase in length, no doubt due to the new front end, but also an additional .5 inch of rear legroom and 2.1 cu ft of additional trunk space.
Old 08-17-15, 02:48 PM
  #188  
peteharvey
Lead Lap
 
peteharvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ca
Posts: 4,276
Received 464 Likes on 308 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
...
They've also noted a 1.4 inch increase in length, no doubt due to the new front end...
Luckily only 1.4", because previously, I thought the new front end would be at least 2 to 4" longer than the original, as the bonnet projects forwards to give slimmer headlights.
Old 08-17-15, 02:50 PM
  #189  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,301
Received 125 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
To be fair, it's now 311 hp, so an increase of 5, not 3.
I have a theory as to why the 5hp increase. The 2.0T puts out 241hp. By making the 2GR-FSE put out 311hp it makes an even 70hp increase over the 2.0T. Looks better on paper
Old 08-17-15, 02:53 PM
  #190  
ItzFilyO
Lexus Test Driver
 
ItzFilyO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: California
Posts: 5,813
Received 1,047 Likes on 662 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
The 2GR-FKS seems to be the same as the FSE, but with the ability to use the Atkinson cycle. Note that the new Tacoma is also using the 2GR-FKS.

As for weight, I cannot explain that. Especially since the IS200t weights less than the IS350. Something doesn't add up. I'm missing a piece of the puzzle.

They've also noted a 1.4 inch increase in length, no doubt due to the new front end, but also an additional .5 inch of rear legroom and 2.1 cu ft of additional trunk space.
That's about 80 lbs difference and that's a lot of cheeseburgers.
Old 08-17-15, 03:10 PM
  #191  
dchar
Lexus Champion
 
dchar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,954
Received 227 Likes on 180 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
Anyone notice the minor fuel mileage improvement on the RWD models?

Also a bit weird that the 2016 GS350 RWD F Sport has different EPA ratings than the RWD non F Sport, actually taking a 1 mpg hit over the 2015.

For the 2GR-FKS (2016):

RWD 20/29/23
RWD F Sport 19/28/22
AWD 19/27/22

Compare this to the 2GR-FSE (2015):

RWD 19/29/23
AWD 19/27/22

I believe the difference in the 2GR-FSE and the 2GR-FKS would be the ability to use the Atkinson cycle on the 2GR-FKS. I need to spend more time studying this.

Sources:

2015:

http://pressroom.lexus.com/releases/...specs.download

2016:

http://pressroom.lexus.com/releases/...specs.download
Why do the F-sport models get worse gas mileage than the regular models? Maybe F-sport models gained the ability to keep the car in Sport S or Sport S+ mode

I'm a little disappointed that they changed the Cabernet red leather option to the Rioja red. I thought cabernet looked more classy...
Old 08-17-15, 03:20 PM
  #192  
ItzFilyO
Lexus Test Driver
 
ItzFilyO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: California
Posts: 5,813
Received 1,047 Likes on 662 Posts
Default

They're only changing the colors right? Not the materials? Not leather to nuluxe?
Old 08-17-15, 03:24 PM
  #193  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,301
Received 125 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dchar
I'm a little disappointed that they changed the Cabernet red leather option to the Rioja red. I thought cabernet looked more classy...
Hmm too bad, I liked cabernet too though some '13 lease returns I've seen the seats came back almost orange looking

Noticed the Luxury Package on the 350 offers "Semi-aniline leather seating trim in Chateau, Black or Noble Brown"

__

Lexus, I want more info on the 450h dangit!
Old 08-17-15, 03:27 PM
  #194  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,463
Received 1,615 Likes on 1,030 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
Hmm too bad, I liked cabernet too though some '13 lease returns I've seen the seats came back almost orange looking

Noticed the Luxury Package on the 350 offers "Semi-aniline leather seating trim in Chateau, Black or Noble Brown"

__

Lexus, I want more info on the 450h dangit!
In case you haven't seen it, here's the product info sheet for the '16 GS450h:

http://pressroom.lexus.com/releases/...specs.download
Old 08-17-15, 03:29 PM
  #195  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,463
Received 1,615 Likes on 1,030 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ItzFilyO
They're only changing the colors right? Not the materials? Not leather to nuluxe?
No mention of NuLuxe. I know I'll be alone in this, but I would rather it came in NuLuxe. After having leather in numerous cars and NuLuxe in my IS, I'd actually prefer to never have real leather again. I much prefer the NuLuxe.


Quick Reply: FINALLY! Refresh 2016 GS pics



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:47 PM.