FINALLY! Refresh 2016 GS pics
#181
Lexus Test Driver
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't know about Lexus tuning, I assumed was as easy as with BMW and Audi. I don't understand why a turbo by Lexus would be different.
Not sure if you extensively drove a modern turbo engine, but the difference is day and night. A 2.0T turbo can almost outrun a 3.5 NA. But let's not talk about racing: day to day driving is so . much . easier with a turbo engine. My 328i pulls at 1,800 RPM the way the GS 350 pulls at 4,500 RPM.
I'm not starting a turbo vs NA debate, to each its own. But from a gas mileage perspective, weight reduction, daily livability, and tuning potential, there's no contest.
Not sure if you extensively drove a modern turbo engine, but the difference is day and night. A 2.0T turbo can almost outrun a 3.5 NA. But let's not talk about racing: day to day driving is so . much . easier with a turbo engine. My 328i pulls at 1,800 RPM the way the GS 350 pulls at 4,500 RPM.
I'm not starting a turbo vs NA debate, to each its own. But from a gas mileage perspective, weight reduction, daily livability, and tuning potential, there's no contest.
I would be shocked if this will change with turbo motors.
Therefore dont expect any crazy HP gains with a flash like u would get with BMW.
There are M4s running over 400hp at the wheels with a simple ECU flash.....
#182
#183
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
When they style well, I always want to purchase the refreshed parts, or purchase the whole car.
However, that said, the Refresh is okay; I'd buy it if I didn't already have the original 4GS.
#184
Lexus Champion
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Anyone notice the minor fuel mileage improvement on the RWD models?
Also a bit weird that the 2016 GS350 RWD F Sport has different EPA ratings than the RWD non F Sport, actually taking a 1 mpg hit over the 2015.
For the 2GR-FKS (2016):
RWD 20/29/23
RWD F Sport 19/28/22
AWD 19/27/22
Compare this to the 2GR-FSE (2015):
RWD 19/29/23
AWD 19/27/22
I believe the difference in the 2GR-FSE and the 2GR-FKS would be the ability to use the Atkinson cycle on the 2GR-FKS. I need to spend more time studying this.
Sources:
2015:
http://pressroom.lexus.com/releases/...specs.download
2016:
http://pressroom.lexus.com/releases/...specs.download
Also a bit weird that the 2016 GS350 RWD F Sport has different EPA ratings than the RWD non F Sport, actually taking a 1 mpg hit over the 2015.
For the 2GR-FKS (2016):
RWD 20/29/23
RWD F Sport 19/28/22
AWD 19/27/22
Compare this to the 2GR-FSE (2015):
RWD 19/29/23
AWD 19/27/22
I believe the difference in the 2GR-FSE and the 2GR-FKS would be the ability to use the Atkinson cycle on the 2GR-FKS. I need to spend more time studying this.
Sources:
2015:
http://pressroom.lexus.com/releases/...specs.download
2016:
http://pressroom.lexus.com/releases/...specs.download
#185
Lexus Test Driver
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
2016 uses 2GR FKS? What is that? ![Big Grin](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Yup! the 200t is heavier than the 350. 3805 lbs vs. 3726 lbs for the 350. How is that even possible?
![Big Grin](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Yup! the 200t is heavier than the 350. 3805 lbs vs. 3726 lbs for the 350. How is that even possible?
![Uhh...](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/1387914497.gif)
Last edited by ItzFilyO; 08-17-15 at 02:32 PM.
#186
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I took a while to decide. I realized that it comes down to the fact that Lexus management really needs to start being smarter. The spindle grill is fine for sports models (IS, GS, RC, LC)... But is a disaster on the luxury and SUV models. A different treatment would be worthwhile there.
Specific thoughts on details:
1. The grill does not work on the normal trim. F-sport - sure - because it resembles an open maw instead of being protuberant in the same way.
2. The DRLs are no surprise, but if you look at what Audi and MB are doing, individual little LEDs are out - instead they are using a much more modern even type of lighting - and it looks a lot better.
3. Mostly clear tails? Really? Is this 2005?
4. And the introduction of the 200t? All bad, all the way. Just cheapens the brand and strikes me as a me-too type move.
Specific thoughts on details:
1. The grill does not work on the normal trim. F-sport - sure - because it resembles an open maw instead of being protuberant in the same way.
2. The DRLs are no surprise, but if you look at what Audi and MB are doing, individual little LEDs are out - instead they are using a much more modern even type of lighting - and it looks a lot better.
3. Mostly clear tails? Really? Is this 2005?
4. And the introduction of the 200t? All bad, all the way. Just cheapens the brand and strikes me as a me-too type move.
#187
Lexus Champion
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As for weight, I cannot explain that. Especially since the IS200t weights less than the IS350. Something doesn't add up. I'm missing a piece of the puzzle.
They've also noted a 1.4 inch increase in length, no doubt due to the new front end, but also an additional .5 inch of rear legroom and 2.1 cu ft of additional trunk space.
![Uhh...](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/1387914497.gif)
#188
#190
Lexus Test Driver
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The 2GR-FKS seems to be the same as the FSE, but with the ability to use the Atkinson cycle. Note that the new Tacoma is also using the 2GR-FKS.
As for weight, I cannot explain that. Especially since the IS200t weights less than the IS350. Something doesn't add up. I'm missing a piece of the puzzle.
They've also noted a 1.4 inch increase in length, no doubt due to the new front end, but also an additional .5 inch of rear legroom and 2.1 cu ft of additional trunk space.![Uhh...](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/1387914497.gif)
As for weight, I cannot explain that. Especially since the IS200t weights less than the IS350. Something doesn't add up. I'm missing a piece of the puzzle.
They've also noted a 1.4 inch increase in length, no doubt due to the new front end, but also an additional .5 inch of rear legroom and 2.1 cu ft of additional trunk space.
![Uhh...](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/1387914497.gif)
![Big Grin](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#191
Lexus Champion
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Anyone notice the minor fuel mileage improvement on the RWD models?
Also a bit weird that the 2016 GS350 RWD F Sport has different EPA ratings than the RWD non F Sport, actually taking a 1 mpg hit over the 2015.
For the 2GR-FKS (2016):
RWD 20/29/23
RWD F Sport 19/28/22
AWD 19/27/22
Compare this to the 2GR-FSE (2015):
RWD 19/29/23
AWD 19/27/22
I believe the difference in the 2GR-FSE and the 2GR-FKS would be the ability to use the Atkinson cycle on the 2GR-FKS. I need to spend more time studying this.
Sources:
2015:
http://pressroom.lexus.com/releases/...specs.download
2016:
http://pressroom.lexus.com/releases/...specs.download
Also a bit weird that the 2016 GS350 RWD F Sport has different EPA ratings than the RWD non F Sport, actually taking a 1 mpg hit over the 2015.
For the 2GR-FKS (2016):
RWD 20/29/23
RWD F Sport 19/28/22
AWD 19/27/22
Compare this to the 2GR-FSE (2015):
RWD 19/29/23
AWD 19/27/22
I believe the difference in the 2GR-FSE and the 2GR-FKS would be the ability to use the Atkinson cycle on the 2GR-FKS. I need to spend more time studying this.
Sources:
2015:
http://pressroom.lexus.com/releases/...specs.download
2016:
http://pressroom.lexus.com/releases/...specs.download
![Woohoo](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/woohoo.gif)
![Woot](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/woot.gif)
![Woohoo](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/woohoo.gif)
I'm a little disappointed that they changed the Cabernet red leather option to the Rioja red. I thought cabernet looked more classy...
#192
Lexus Test Driver
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
They're only changing the colors right? Not the materials? Not leather to nuluxe?
#193
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Uhh...](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/1387914497.gif)
Noticed the Luxury Package on the 350 offers "Semi-aniline leather seating trim in Chateau, Black or Noble Brown"
__
Lexus, I want more info on the 450h dangit!
#194
Lexus Champion
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hmm too bad, I liked cabernet too though some '13 lease returns I've seen the seats came back almost orange looking ![Uhh...](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/1387914497.gif)
Noticed the Luxury Package on the 350 offers "Semi-aniline leather seating trim in Chateau, Black or Noble Brown"
__
Lexus, I want more info on the 450h dangit!
![Uhh...](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/1387914497.gif)
Noticed the Luxury Package on the 350 offers "Semi-aniline leather seating trim in Chateau, Black or Noble Brown"
__
Lexus, I want more info on the 450h dangit!
http://pressroom.lexus.com/releases/...specs.download
#195
Lexus Champion
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No mention of NuLuxe. I know I'll be alone in this, but I would rather it came in NuLuxe. After having leather in numerous cars and NuLuxe in my IS, I'd actually prefer to never have real leather again. I much prefer the NuLuxe.