How dated is the GS350?
#1
Pit Crew
Thread Starter
How dated is the GS350?
By today's standard is it very far behind modern cars? Excluding EV's since they almost always come with fancy tech. I'm talking about the features thst make the GS a comfortable cruiser but also have sporty dynamics. Things like VGRS, rear wheel steering, avs all of these which I think were expensive features reserved for luxury cars back in 2013. But nowadays they seem to be standard in many cars or am I wrong?
#2
Lexus Test Driver
I don't think it's dated at all, unless ur comparing the tech/nav system vs. those CarPlay alone then yes but driving dynamics, this car is very good even today. We still get all speed radar cruise control and lane centering that can handle mild bends on the highway so it's not too bad.
Long drives, short drives, stuck in traffic, going fast in corners, this car is good for all. Those with the fancy infotainment are usually not that good to drive or the built quality isn't all that good.
The GS doesn't look good on paper but driving it tells u a different story.
Long drives, short drives, stuck in traffic, going fast in corners, this car is good for all. Those with the fancy infotainment are usually not that good to drive or the built quality isn't all that good.
The GS doesn't look good on paper but driving it tells u a different story.
Last edited by ItzFilyO; 02-09-22 at 08:03 AM.
The following 6 users liked this post by ItzFilyO:
AJLex19 (02-09-22),
greys0uled (02-09-22),
Im2bz2p345 (02-09-22),
lexus4jess (08-08-22),
NJLEXES (02-09-22),
and 1 others liked this post.
#3
As with most cars, condition is everything. I see very clean GSs and as long as they're shiny with non-hazy headlights, they still look great. That styling has really seemed to hold up.
The following users liked this post:
ECL (02-09-22)
#4
The pre-refresh 13-15's that didn't come with safety features like PCS/LKA and radar cruise are definitely more dated than the newer 16's+.
Tech wise the GS misses things like Carplay, 360 view camera, etc that newer cars have, but the pure driving dynamics like @ItzFilyO said are still great today.
Tech wise the GS misses things like Carplay, 360 view camera, etc that newer cars have, but the pure driving dynamics like @ItzFilyO said are still great today.
The following 2 users liked this post by jgscott:
Im2bz2p345 (02-09-22),
lexus4jess (08-08-22)
#6
The pre-refresh 13-15's that didn't come with safety features like PCS/LKA and radar cruise are definitely more dated than the newer 16's+.
Tech wise the GS misses things like Carplay, 360 view camera, etc that newer cars have, but the pure driving dynamics like @ItzFilyO said are still great today.
Tech wise the GS misses things like Carplay, 360 view camera, etc that newer cars have, but the pure driving dynamics like @ItzFilyO said are still great today.
Now the PCS is not as advanced as today's systems that will brake completely to a dead stop for you. It flashes a warning light and beeps at you and applies the brakes full force once you start to hit the brakes. It's come on twice in the 7 months I've owned the car and gave me plenty of warning/distance to brake.
Lexus offered PCS and radar cruise as far back as 2006 in the LS and 2007 in the GS. They didn't include all the safety features as standard until 2017 and the 2016+ PCS/RC was a more advanced tech than the 2013-2015s.
Last edited by jeverett72; 02-09-22 at 04:59 PM.
#8
As others said, the driving experience is certainly not dated. I solved the dated infotainment issue myself with the GROM unit, and now it’s more capable than any other system out there.
Where I feel the GS is most dated is in the HP department. 306/311 whatever they rate it at is being made by 4 cylinders now, and it somehow has turbo lag without the turbo.
Comfort, style, and handling though in this segment are hard to beat, even if the car is approaching 10 years old now. I also think the 4GS design is pretty timeless, much like the E46 M3. This car will look good for years to come. Unlike the E46 M3 however, these will actually last that long. 😂
Where I feel the GS is most dated is in the HP department. 306/311 whatever they rate it at is being made by 4 cylinders now, and it somehow has turbo lag without the turbo.
Comfort, style, and handling though in this segment are hard to beat, even if the car is approaching 10 years old now. I also think the 4GS design is pretty timeless, much like the E46 M3. This car will look good for years to come. Unlike the E46 M3 however, these will actually last that long. 😂
#9
As others said, the driving experience is certainly not dated. I solved the dated infotainment issue myself with the GROM unit, and now it’s more capable than any other system out there.
Where I feel the GS is most dated is in the HP department. 306/311 whatever they rate it at is being made by 4 cylinders now, and it somehow has turbo lag without the turbo.
Comfort, style, and handling though in this segment are hard to beat, even if the car is approaching 10 years old now. I also think the 4GS design is pretty timeless, much like the E46 M3. This car will look good for years to come. Unlike the E46 M3 however, these will actually last that long. 😂
Where I feel the GS is most dated is in the HP department. 306/311 whatever they rate it at is being made by 4 cylinders now, and it somehow has turbo lag without the turbo.
Comfort, style, and handling though in this segment are hard to beat, even if the car is approaching 10 years old now. I also think the 4GS design is pretty timeless, much like the E46 M3. This car will look good for years to come. Unlike the E46 M3 however, these will actually last that long. 😂
I am not sure if GS falls in the same timeless category as the E46 M3 though.
For me, a naturally aspirated engine, RWD, and theoretically reliable platform is why I got mine.
#11
To be fair, the S54 is actually a brilliant engine. I think it's still incredible today, let alone the early 2000s.
I am not sure if GS falls in the same timeless category as the E46 M3 though.
For me, a naturally aspirated engine, RWD, and theoretically reliable platform is why I got mine.
I am not sure if GS falls in the same timeless category as the E46 M3 though.
For me, a naturally aspirated engine, RWD, and theoretically reliable platform is why I got mine.
I disagree though about the 2016+ 4GS on styling. I guess we'll see 20 years from now how the styling holds up, but I think it will withstand the test of time very well. The exterior design and the stance on these cars is beautiful. The biggest issue (to me) is Lexus tried to make all of their cars look the same, so it dilutes it.
The following users liked this post:
greys0uled (02-10-22)
#12
Lexus did offer PCS and radar cruise as options on the 2013-2015s. My 2013 has both. The reason there are so few is that buyers back then didn't opt for it. I'm glad the lady who bought mine did opt for those and she even opted for the Cold Weather Package even tho she lived in Alabama. Came in handy this past week with the freezing weather here in TX.
Now the PCS is not as advanced as today's systems that will brake completely to a dead stop for you. It flashes a warning light and beeps at you and applies the brakes full force once you start to hit the brakes. It's come on twice in the 7 months I've owned the car and gave me plenty of warning/distance to brake.
Lexus offered PCS and radar cruise as far back as 2006 in the LS and 2007 in the GS. They didn't include all the safety features as standard until 2017 and the 2016+ PCS/RC was a more advanced tech than the 2013-2015s.
Now the PCS is not as advanced as today's systems that will brake completely to a dead stop for you. It flashes a warning light and beeps at you and applies the brakes full force once you start to hit the brakes. It's come on twice in the 7 months I've owned the car and gave me plenty of warning/distance to brake.
Lexus offered PCS and radar cruise as far back as 2006 in the LS and 2007 in the GS. They didn't include all the safety features as standard until 2017 and the 2016+ PCS/RC was a more advanced tech than the 2013-2015s.
#13
Lead Lap
I don't think it's dated at all, unless ur comparing the tech/nav system vs. those CarPlay alone then yes but driving dynamics, this car is very good even today. We still get all speed radar cruise control and lane centering that can handle mild bends on the highway so it's not too bad.
Long drives, short drives, stuck in traffic, going fast in corners, this car is good for all. Those with the fancy infotainment are usually not that good to drive or the built quality isn't all that good.
The GS doesn't look good on paper but driving it tells u a different story.
Long drives, short drives, stuck in traffic, going fast in corners, this car is good for all. Those with the fancy infotainment are usually not that good to drive or the built quality isn't all that good.
The GS doesn't look good on paper but driving it tells u a different story.
#14
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
I think most enthusiasts will forgo the infotainment and general tech presented to them while inside if the car has a compelling drive. By ultra-modern standards, the GS is only dated because of its lack of upgraded interior tech (touchscreens, better smartphone integration, OTA updates, map guidance, etc)...anyone who drives a GS regularly knows why its a keeper.
#15
I think most enthusiasts will forgo the infotainment and general tech presented to them while inside if the car has a compelling drive. By ultra-modern standards, the GS is only dated because of its lack of upgraded interior tech (touchscreens, better smartphone integration, OTA updates, map guidance, etc)...anyone who drives a GS regularly knows why its a keeper.
Market forces, however, dictate otherwise. And driving dynamics aren't important to 90% of the population, they'll take a ****ty touch screen instead.