GS - 4th Gen (2013-2020) Discussion about the 2013 and up GS models

IS 350 MPG's vs. GS 350 MPG's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-15 | 07:06 AM
  #1  
dbs600's Avatar
dbs600
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 1
From: NY
Default IS 350 MPG's vs. GS 350 MPG's

Is there any way a base 2015 GS 350 AWD could have better MPG’s than a 2014 IS 350 AWD F Sport, such that F Sport tuning diminishes MPG’s?

Thanks!
Old 03-26-15 | 07:08 AM
  #2  
dbs600's Avatar
dbs600
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 1
From: NY
Default GS 350 MPG's vs. IS 350 MPG's

Is there any way a base 2015 GS 350 AWD could have better MPG’s than a 2014 IS 350 AWD F Sport, such that F Sport tuning diminishes MPG’s?

Thanks!
Old 03-26-15 | 07:26 AM
  #3  
praetor's Avatar
praetor
Racer
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 150
From: IL
Default

Gearing and curb weight will have a lot to do with MPGs. I believe the engines are identical but one could be mapped differently.
Old 03-26-15 | 08:43 AM
  #4  
FrOHiKE's Avatar
FrOHiKE
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Tx
Default

The F Sport engine is the same as the base engine. No modifications are made to the F Sport engine.
Old 03-26-15 | 10:10 AM
  #5  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,323
Likes: 129
From: California
Default

Variables such as engine break-in, quality of gas, different driving habits. The cars do have the same engine and similar weights, different aerodynamics/co.drag. So to answer your question, yes the mileage can go both ways
Old 03-26-15 | 12:00 PM
  #6  
dbs600's Avatar
dbs600
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 1
From: NY
Default

Okay; thank you very much, Gentlemen!

Anyone know if the engines are mapped differently? Maybe there’s different transmission gearing? Or the exhaust setup could be different as well?
Old 03-26-15 | 12:08 PM
  #7  
dbs600's Avatar
dbs600
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 1
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by praetor
Gearing and curb weight will have a lot to do with MPGs. I believe the engines are identical but one could be mapped differently.
Thanks for your reply.

Hmm, before I get involved in another MPG mess, wish there was a way to know.

No matter what I do, I've always gotten dismal MPG's in my IS; hope only due to F Sport.
Old 03-26-15 | 12:31 PM
  #8  
praetor's Avatar
praetor
Racer
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 150
From: IL
Default

I drive mostly stop and go city miles, say 60/40 and I generally get about 18 to 20MPG on my 2013 AWD GS FSport. I tend to drive fast on the expressway but best I have gotten was 28MPG cruising at about 65MPH.

In theory though under normal driving conditions the IS350 would get better MPGs as it is about 500lbs lighter.
Old 03-26-15 | 12:33 PM
  #9  
ItzFilyO's Avatar
ItzFilyO
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,813
Likes: 1,052
From: California
Default

It should be the same between both IS and GS 350s. The IS 250 loaner I got had worse MPG than my GS I think cause I keep revving it to get more power out of it Vs. the 350 engine u barely tap it and it flies.
Old 03-26-15 | 12:40 PM
  #10  
SlangBlade's Avatar
SlangBlade
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 299
Likes: 1
From: .
Default

They should be about identical. That is to say, unimpressive. GS weighs a bit more, but if memory serves, it is also has a touch less drag. Call it a wash?
Old 03-26-15 | 12:43 PM
  #11  
praetor's Avatar
praetor
Racer
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 150
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by ItzFilyO
It should be the same between both IS and GS 350s. The IS 250 loaner I got had worse MPG than my GS I think cause I keep revving it to get more power out of it Vs. the 350 engine u barely tap it and it flies.
Same here. I kept it in Sport mode and the revs were always high. The 250 is not for me.
Old 03-26-15 | 12:45 PM
  #12  
JDR76's Avatar
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 12,559
Likes: 1,630
From: WA
Default

I assume this is based on your disappointment with your IS350 AWD F Sport mileage and desire to trade it in for a GS350 AWD, and hoping you will achieve better mileage.

There isn't anything specific to an F Sport IS that would give it better or worse mileage than a standard IS. Given that an AWD GS350 weighs about 230 lbs more, I would suspect a GS would not get better mileage than your IS, assuming your IS is working properly.

EPA estimates for the AWD GS are 19/26/21, which is the same rating as the IS350 AWD.
Old 03-26-15 | 01:50 PM
  #13  
dojoman's Avatar
dojoman
Lead Lap
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,906
Likes: 270
From: California
Default

Go to GS forum, some people have bad mileage with GS too. It's not the car it's how you drive and traffic condition, etc. These cars are not exactly green car to begin with.
Old 03-26-15 | 03:56 PM
  #14  
corradoMR2's Avatar
corradoMR2
The pursuit of F
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,296
Likes: 297
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

Factor in tires and width as well (rolling resistance). I believe the GS AWD has a narrower square setup vs the IS F Sport AWD with the staggered (and "fat" 255s in the rear).

Same transfer case UF1AE and same A760H 6-speed automatic tranny in both GS AWD and IS AWD with virtually identical ratios.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
2013 GS 350 Product Info.pdf (41.9 KB, 462 views)
Old 03-27-15 | 10:45 PM
  #15  
dbs600's Avatar
dbs600
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 1
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
I assume this is based on your disappointment with your IS350 AWD F Sport mileage and desire to trade it in for a GS350 AWD, and hoping you will achieve better mileage.

There isn't anything specific to an F Sport IS that would give it better or worse mileage than a standard IS. Given that an AWD GS350 weighs about 230 lbs more, I would suspect a GS would not get better mileage than your IS, assuming your IS is working properly.

EPA estimates for the AWD GS are 19/26/21, which is the same rating as the IS350 AWD.
You hit the nail on head, JDR76.

Unfortunately, yes, I've noticed that the EPA estimates are identical. :|

Originally Posted by dojoman
Go to GS forum, some people have bad mileage with GS too. It's not the car it's how you drive and traffic condition, etc. These cars are not exactly green car to begin with.
Argh.

Thanks.


Quick Reply: IS 350 MPG's vs. GS 350 MPG's



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:42 AM.