GS F (2016-present) Discussion topics related to the GS F model

Lexus debuts 2016 GS F

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-15 | 06:25 PM
  #346  
Mr Bond's Avatar
Mr Bond
Pole Position
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: europe
Default

Originally Posted by SNiiP3R

And I don't see how their cheif engineer can compare the GS-F to RC-F? If you wanted to make a sedan with that V8 engine,then you should have kept the IS-F. Then you would have a comparable sedan and the coupe. Right now you have a good coupe and half baked sedan.
I do actually feel sorry for him, who knows what goes on behind the curtains ? There is highly unlikely that RC-F ( mock-up of three different chassis = heavy ) or GS-F ( this engine ) is what he really wanted to create or should have chosen if he had free hands.

Its pretty clear that Mr Yaguchi is true car enthusiast and he has no problem telling people that Porsche 911 is the best car he knows. This GS-F is made by the people at the financial department. I would actually not be surprised at all if he left Lexus in a near future.
Old 01-12-15 | 06:30 PM
  #347  
xioix's Avatar
xioix
Racer
CL Folding 200000
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 0
From: so. cal
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
Sure, but to play devils advocate perhaps Lexus F is going the way of Audi S and Cadillac Vsport. A few months back this FS/F-S rumor dropped which would make it an RS / V competitor. Some food for thought

Also this isn't as much about sales (this caliber car), though adding the V8 to this helps with costs by putting it in both RC and GS.



IS F is simply on hiatus. When the 4GS launched we pointed out the ample engine bay room, when the 3IS launched we pointed out the 'lack of' engine bay room. V8 IS days are over, with the exception of C-Class for now, M3, ATS-V, possible XE (insert hot version here) are to be had with six cylinders.

Well they are related
Having the F go down market shouldn't be something Lexus should do. Lexus wants to have people change the perception of the brand, and when the LFA was created it made people think twice about Lexus and what F really is. Now with this GS-F it changes it again, but this time in a bad way. If the FS was suppose to be the hardcore version, make it the hardcore version going up against the AMG Black
Old 01-12-15 | 06:45 PM
  #348  
SNiiP3R's Avatar
SNiiP3R
Lead Lap
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,086
Likes: 35
From: Fuhgeddaboudit
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411

IS F is simply on hiatus. When the 4GS launched we pointed out the ample engine bay room, when the 3IS launched we pointed out the 'lack of' engine bay room. V8 IS days are over, with the exception of C-Class for now, M3, ATS-V, possible XE (insert hot version here) are to be had with six cylinders.

Well they are related
Sometimes I think that Lexus chief engineers either hate each other or don't communicate with one another. The GS-F engineer praises V8's, IS engineer makes no room for one? Of course they follow the orders from above. I wish we knew who in Lexus decided to cancel an already established IS-F sedan. We all know that they put a lot of work into it, to get that name out there. Apparently it all was done for nothing
Old 01-12-15 | 07:04 PM
  #349  
Lurker9's Avatar
Lurker9
Pole Position
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 298
Likes: 99
From: ON
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
Clearly the next generation of powertrains are not ready. Would you rather we wait two more years or so before they come out then release a 'proper' GS F? Or better yet utilize a current platform and latest V8 to good use.

I think you're on the right track with this logic. However, I would like to add this.
IMHO, Lexus engineers are not clueless as some of us would like to think. In order to justify the existence of the GS F, they must prove to the bean counters that there are buyers ready to write the checks. The business case probably went down like this:

- 550 HP GS F for 120K - Conquest sales = 0 (brand snobbery), Lexus enthusiasts = maybe 5? (love it, but too expensive...)
- 467 HP GS F for 70-80K - Conquest sales = 0 (brand snobbery), Lexus enthusiasts = 500 (GS 350 upgraders, ex IS F owners, RC F admirers needing 2 extra doors, and anyone else that wanted a fun, fast reliable sport sedan without breaking the bank)

Obviously the latter was chosen because the accountants weren't dumb. So if the 500 GS F buyer materialized as planned, the engineers would then have a stronger case to make the extra hot GS F.
Also, this might seem to be the equivalent of a GS 500, but starting the GS F line here is a much better move if they were planning to expand the model down the road.
Old 01-12-15 | 07:21 PM
  #350  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,327
Likes: 129
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by RNM GS3
I read that GSF is limited to 200 units, if that is true then Lexus is just
Do they just setup these cars for failure so they can say "Look Mr. Toyoda - we told you these cars don't sell, we need a small CUV."
Really? Do you have a link by chance? That's disconcerting news. We expected F's to be low volume but not 'limited' volume

Originally Posted by xioix
Having the F go down market shouldn't be something Lexus should do. Lexus wants to have people change the perception of the brand, and when the LFA was created it made people think twice about Lexus and what F really is. Now with this GS-F it changes it again, but this time in a bad way. If the FS was suppose to be the hardcore version, make it the hardcore version going up against the AMG Black
I agree with this statement, however, personally I'm giving Lexus the benefit of the doubt in that I'm happy to see a new trim for the GS and don't mind patiently waiting for that 550+hp version. 467hp is more than I need.

Originally Posted by SNiiP3R
Sometimes I think that Lexus chief engineers either hate each other or don't communicate with one another. The GS-F engineer praises V8's, IS engineer makes no room for one? Of course they follow the orders from above. I wish we knew who in Lexus decided to cancel an already established IS-F sedan. We all know that they put a lot of work into it, to get that name out there. Apparently it all was done for nothing
It's hard to tell who calls the shots. But unless they seriously shoehorn a V8 I don't see it happening, 3IS engine bay is minuscule and if you recall the IS F was a skunkworks project anyway so the V8 really was an afterthought. Though a TTV6 is likely I wouldn't count out a low displacement V8 in the 4.0-4.9L range and FI application though likely for other models.
Old 01-12-15 | 07:29 PM
  #351  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,327
Likes: 129
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Lurker9
I think you're on the right track with this logic. However, I would like to add this.
IMHO, Lexus engineers are not clueless as some of us would like to think. In order to justify the existence of the GS F, they must prove to the bean counters that there are buyers ready to write the checks. The business case probably went down like this:

- 550 HP GS F for 120K - Conquest sales = 0 (brand snobbery), Lexus enthusiasts = maybe 5? (love it, but too expensive...)
- 467 HP GS F for 70-80K - Conquest sales = 0 (brand snobbery), Lexus enthusiasts = 500 (GS 350 upgraders, ex IS F owners, RC F admirers needing 2 extra doors, and anyone else that wanted a fun, fast reliable sport sedan without breaking the bank)

Obviously the latter was chosen because the accountants weren't dumb. So if the 500 GS F buyer materialized as planned, the engineers would then have a stronger case to make the extra hot GS F.
Also, this might seem to be the equivalent of a GS 500, but starting the GS F line here is a much better move if they were planning to expand the model down the road.
Great point. Surely Akio does not always get his way (though many enthusiasts would back his notions of passionate vehicles) and helps keep things even keel between vehicles created for mass consumption and ones bore from passion.
Old 01-12-15 | 07:37 PM
  #352  
tmf2004's Avatar
tmf2004
5% Club. Killing it!!!
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,942
Likes: 64
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by rominl
?! gs400 has 300hp. ls430 has 300hp. ls460 has 380hp. usually the numbers refer to the engine displacements, same for other brands
your right Henry. I was trying to figure out where people were getting the GS500. but yes it makes sense since it would be a 5liter engine
Old 01-12-15 | 08:10 PM
  #353  
RNM GS3's Avatar
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,331
Likes: 73
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
Really? Do you have a link by chance? That's disconcerting news. We expected F's to be low volume but not 'limited' volume
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._f_first_look/

"RC F is easier to drive because of the shorter wheelbase ... tradeoff for ride comfort on GS F," responded Yukihiko Yaguchi, Lexus chief engineer for both cars and the retired IS F, to our inquiry on whether the F coupe or sedan is easier to drift. So we're not anointing any comparison winners at the moment, but it's safe to say we've found the current-generation GS charming. And with 200 potentially charming GS Fs pegged for sale in the U.S., the long-rumored hot GS will further cultivate F's core brand value of accessible performance.
Old 01-12-15 | 08:25 PM
  #354  
Gojirra99's Avatar
Gojirra99
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 30,120
Likes: 231
From: Canada
Default

LOL if it's really true and not a typo or wrong info, no wonder they just put the RC F engine in it, why bother to do anything more ......
Old 01-12-15 | 08:46 PM
  #355  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 75,645
Likes: 2,593
From: Present
Default

Originally Posted by rominl
what makes you think that v10 will work well in the gs? that engine is only 4.8l, it works wonders on a 3200lb car. but on a 4000lb car it might work very different.
not saying it would be easy or unmodified. it could be adjusted to be less of a screamer.

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
People love classification. At the heart of the big German three are 3 sedans (3, 5, 7, A4, A6, A8, C, E, S) each that make up the core and everything follows after.
while 'orderly' people might like your tidy comparison there, of course it's meaningless because there's also 1, 2, 4, 6, a1, a2, a3, a5, a7, a, b, gla, cls, and a bunch of others too. may not all be 'sedans' but sedans aren't even the big chunk of the market any longer, cuv/suvs are, and we didn't even cover that horde of models.

Unfortunately the Lexus stable has the monkey wrench ES
that 'monkey wrench' no doubt contributes vastly to lexus profits. when you're not the top dog you don't want to compete 'head on' you want to stir it up, do what the other guys AREN'T doing, which lexus has done continually with es, rx, hs (well 2 out of 3 ain't bad ), cth, etc.

RC itself is a mash-up of 3IS, IS C and 4GS and Lexus said it is its own model, not an IS coupe or a GS coupe (no matter what label you, me or anyone wants to put on it). So it's hard to classify unless you're comparing trim calibers against Lexus's own models and/or the competition.
exactly, hard to classify, just how lexus wants it, but magazines and forums will insist on comparing rc with 4 series and a5 i guess.

Peoples biggest problem is simply the name, because guaranteed this will not be a bad car. If it was called GS500 F-Sport, they'd say well the CTS VSport, 550i and S6 are it's competitors now I can move on.
most people talking about it and bothered by it wouldn't buy it no matter what it's called.

Thankfully they utilized what they currently have and offered something to give depth and roots for the GS line.
yup

Originally Posted by xioix
Having a GS-F is great only if it can really compete with the others, if the GS-F can't compete and can't really move the needle in sales or excitement, it will be a one and done offering.
100% disagree.

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
I respect your opinions gents. Personally its how you view what this car is GS500/ GS F/ GS ???. For me, I'm tired of waiting. GS350 and rare bird GS450h can't hold a candle to the array of FI, I4, V6, V8, diesel, hybrid powertrains in the competition. Adding the F and 200t in September will help tremendously. Once they're out continual improvements and additions to will give the GS (and other Lexus models) a stronger foothold in the segment.
maybe. the competition isn't standing still either.
Old 01-12-15 | 09:13 PM
  #356  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,327
Likes: 129
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
while 'orderly' people might like your tidy comparison there, of course it's meaningless because there's also 1, 2, 4, 6, a1, a2, a3, a5, a7, a, b, gla, cls, and a bunch of others too. may not all be 'sedans' but sedans aren't even the big chunk of the market any longer, cuv/suvs are, and we didn't even cover that horde of models.
I'm just talking about the typical Small Medium Large. The ones you listed are essentially spawned from and/or are 'filler' vehicles helping to strengthen each core model (3-Sedan - wagon, GT, 4-Series - coupe, convertible, 4-door coupe ). Let's not even start with the CUVs

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
that 'monkey wrench' no doubt contributes vastly to lexus profits. when you're not the top dog you don't want to compete 'head on' you want to stir it up, do what the other guys AREN'T doing, which lexus has done continually with es, rx, hs (well 2 out of 3 ain't bad ), cth, etc.
Won't argue that the ES isn't important to the brand, because it is. Just saying if Lexus had went the traditional route with the GS and never introduced the ES250 in the early nineties, the GS would likely be more on par with other luxury mid sizes today.

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
exactly, hard to classify, just how lexus wants it, but magazines and forums will insist on comparing rc with 4 series and a5 i guess.
Perhaps we need to start asking the automakers. "What do you want the *insert car here* to compete against?

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
most people talking about it and bothered by it wouldn't buy it no matter what it's called.
Truth
Old 01-12-15 | 09:29 PM
  #357  
natnut's Avatar
natnut
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 88
From: Singapore
Default

Originally Posted by situman
Most of the people that buy these kinds of cars are usually high income individuals. Its all about the bragging rights. The true German snobs will hold their nose at anything that didn't come out of Germany and its those that will tell you how much HP and how fast it goes, while they are stuck in traffic all the time or circling a mall parking lot. Price is usually secondary as a "btw...it only costs." This just shows the marketing team has not researched the correct clientele for this type of vehicle. For the very few that will take this kind of car to the track, sure driven in isolation it's fun, but when an M5 or an AMG blows your doors off on the straights and possibly on corners as well......
But that's the point, with the current generation of GS and IS, it's been Lexus that's been blowing the doors off BMW in the corners....even when BMW has the upper hand in straightline speed.
Old 01-12-15 | 09:31 PM
  #358  
natnut's Avatar
natnut
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 88
From: Singapore
Default

Originally Posted by cino
Anyone paying around 100K for a car should have bragging right IMO.
But the GS-F will probably only be 80K at the most.
Old 01-12-15 | 09:58 PM
  #359  
Gojirra99's Avatar
Gojirra99
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 30,120
Likes: 231
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by natnut
But the GS-F will probably only be 80K at the most.
If that's true, i wonder how people figure that a GS with 83 hp more to 550 will jump up to anywhere near $120K
Old 01-12-15 | 10:04 PM
  #360  
TF109B's Avatar
TF109B
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 2
From: Washington
Default

Originally Posted by cino
Anyone paying around 100K for a car should have bragging right IMO.
Thats for people that need to compensate for a lack of something else imo. Not everyone wants the most power, or the fastest in 0-60, 1/4 mile.
Originally Posted by RNM GS3
Since when is Charger in same class with BMW, MB, AUDI, or Lexus.
The car overall is a built to a much cheaper standard.

If you want to just compare performance #s like 0-60 or 1/4 mile then fine, i am sure the M5 and especially E63amg and RS7 (both being AWD) would fare quite well.

You do realize a 550i does 0-60 in 4.3-4.5sec, GSF would be Lucky to even match those #s.
The RC F is the same weight and power, has no issue doing 4.3 0-60. Funny how the argument changes when a charger from dodge beats Mercedes BMW Audi Jag etc. in power but its "not in the same class"- which proves a point. You dont have to do what everyone else is doing because its "in your class". So what?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:44 PM.