Lexus debuts 2016 GS F
#346
Its pretty clear that Mr Yaguchi is true car enthusiast and he has no problem telling people that Porsche 911 is the best car he knows. This GS-F is made by the people at the financial department. I would actually not be surprised at all if he left Lexus in a near future.
#347
Sure, but to play devils advocate perhaps Lexus F is going the way of Audi S and Cadillac Vsport. A few months back this FS/F-S rumor dropped which would make it an RS / V competitor. Some food for thought
Also this isn't as much about sales (this caliber car), though adding the V8 to this helps with costs by putting it in both RC and GS.
IS F is simply on hiatus. When the 4GS launched we pointed out the ample engine bay room, when the 3IS launched we pointed out the 'lack of' engine bay room. V8 IS days are over, with the exception of C-Class for now, M3, ATS-V, possible XE (insert hot version here) are to be had with six cylinders.
Well they are related
Also this isn't as much about sales (this caliber car), though adding the V8 to this helps with costs by putting it in both RC and GS.
IS F is simply on hiatus. When the 4GS launched we pointed out the ample engine bay room, when the 3IS launched we pointed out the 'lack of' engine bay room. V8 IS days are over, with the exception of C-Class for now, M3, ATS-V, possible XE (insert hot version here) are to be had with six cylinders.
Well they are related
#348
IS F is simply on hiatus. When the 4GS launched we pointed out the ample engine bay room, when the 3IS launched we pointed out the 'lack of' engine bay room. V8 IS days are over, with the exception of C-Class for now, M3, ATS-V, possible XE (insert hot version here) are to be had with six cylinders.
Well they are related
#349
IMHO, Lexus engineers are not clueless as some of us would like to think. In order to justify the existence of the GS F, they must prove to the bean counters that there are buyers ready to write the checks. The business case probably went down like this:
- 550 HP GS F for 120K - Conquest sales = 0 (brand snobbery), Lexus enthusiasts = maybe 5? (love it, but too expensive...)
- 467 HP GS F for 70-80K - Conquest sales = 0 (brand snobbery), Lexus enthusiasts = 500 (GS 350 upgraders, ex IS F owners, RC F admirers needing 2 extra doors, and anyone else that wanted a fun, fast reliable sport sedan without breaking the bank)
Obviously the latter was chosen because the accountants weren't dumb. So if the 500 GS F buyer materialized as planned, the engineers would then have a stronger case to make the extra hot GS F.
Also, this might seem to be the equivalent of a GS 500, but starting the GS F line here is a much better move if they were planning to expand the model down the road.
#350
Having the F go down market shouldn't be something Lexus should do. Lexus wants to have people change the perception of the brand, and when the LFA was created it made people think twice about Lexus and what F really is. Now with this GS-F it changes it again, but this time in a bad way. If the FS was suppose to be the hardcore version, make it the hardcore version going up against the AMG Black
Sometimes I think that Lexus chief engineers either hate each other or don't communicate with one another. The GS-F engineer praises V8's, IS engineer makes no room for one? Of course they follow the orders from above. I wish we knew who in Lexus decided to cancel an already established IS-F sedan. We all know that they put a lot of work into it, to get that name out there. Apparently it all was done for nothing
#351
I think you're on the right track with this logic. However, I would like to add this.
IMHO, Lexus engineers are not clueless as some of us would like to think. In order to justify the existence of the GS F, they must prove to the bean counters that there are buyers ready to write the checks. The business case probably went down like this:
- 550 HP GS F for 120K - Conquest sales = 0 (brand snobbery), Lexus enthusiasts = maybe 5? (love it, but too expensive...)
- 467 HP GS F for 70-80K - Conquest sales = 0 (brand snobbery), Lexus enthusiasts = 500 (GS 350 upgraders, ex IS F owners, RC F admirers needing 2 extra doors, and anyone else that wanted a fun, fast reliable sport sedan without breaking the bank)
Obviously the latter was chosen because the accountants weren't dumb. So if the 500 GS F buyer materialized as planned, the engineers would then have a stronger case to make the extra hot GS F.
Also, this might seem to be the equivalent of a GS 500, but starting the GS F line here is a much better move if they were planning to expand the model down the road.
IMHO, Lexus engineers are not clueless as some of us would like to think. In order to justify the existence of the GS F, they must prove to the bean counters that there are buyers ready to write the checks. The business case probably went down like this:
- 550 HP GS F for 120K - Conquest sales = 0 (brand snobbery), Lexus enthusiasts = maybe 5? (love it, but too expensive...)
- 467 HP GS F for 70-80K - Conquest sales = 0 (brand snobbery), Lexus enthusiasts = 500 (GS 350 upgraders, ex IS F owners, RC F admirers needing 2 extra doors, and anyone else that wanted a fun, fast reliable sport sedan without breaking the bank)
Obviously the latter was chosen because the accountants weren't dumb. So if the 500 GS F buyer materialized as planned, the engineers would then have a stronger case to make the extra hot GS F.
Also, this might seem to be the equivalent of a GS 500, but starting the GS F line here is a much better move if they were planning to expand the model down the road.
#352
#353
"RC F is easier to drive because of the shorter wheelbase ... tradeoff for ride comfort on GS F," responded Yukihiko Yaguchi, Lexus chief engineer for both cars and the retired IS F, to our inquiry on whether the F coupe or sedan is easier to drift. So we're not anointing any comparison winners at the moment, but it's safe to say we've found the current-generation GS charming. And with 200 potentially charming GS Fs pegged for sale in the U.S., the long-rumored hot GS will further cultivate F's core brand value of accessible performance.
#355
Unfortunately the Lexus stable has the monkey wrench ES
RC itself is a mash-up of 3IS, IS C and 4GS and Lexus said it is its own model, not an IS coupe or a GS coupe (no matter what label you, me or anyone wants to put on it). So it's hard to classify unless you're comparing trim calibers against Lexus's own models and/or the competition.
Peoples biggest problem is simply the name, because guaranteed this will not be a bad car. If it was called GS500 F-Sport, they'd say well the CTS VSport, 550i and S6 are it's competitors now I can move on.
Thankfully they utilized what they currently have and offered something to give depth and roots for the GS line.
I respect your opinions gents. Personally its how you view what this car is GS500/ GS F/ GS ???. For me, I'm tired of waiting. GS350 and rare bird GS450h can't hold a candle to the array of FI, I4, V6, V8, diesel, hybrid powertrains in the competition. Adding the F and 200t in September will help tremendously. Once they're out continual improvements and additions to will give the GS (and other Lexus models) a stronger foothold in the segment.
#356
while 'orderly' people might like your tidy comparison there, of course it's meaningless because there's also 1, 2, 4, 6, a1, a2, a3, a5, a7, a, b, gla, cls, and a bunch of others too. may not all be 'sedans' but sedans aren't even the big chunk of the market any longer, cuv/suvs are, and we didn't even cover that horde of models.
that 'monkey wrench' no doubt contributes vastly to lexus profits. when you're not the top dog you don't want to compete 'head on' you want to stir it up, do what the other guys AREN'T doing, which lexus has done continually with es, rx, hs (well 2 out of 3 ain't bad ), cth, etc.
Truth
#357
Most of the people that buy these kinds of cars are usually high income individuals. Its all about the bragging rights. The true German snobs will hold their nose at anything that didn't come out of Germany and its those that will tell you how much HP and how fast it goes, while they are stuck in traffic all the time or circling a mall parking lot. Price is usually secondary as a "btw...it only costs." This just shows the marketing team has not researched the correct clientele for this type of vehicle. For the very few that will take this kind of car to the track, sure driven in isolation it's fun, but when an M5 or an AMG blows your doors off on the straights and possibly on corners as well......
#360
Thats for people that need to compensate for a lack of something else imo. Not everyone wants the most power, or the fastest in 0-60, 1/4 mile.
The RC F is the same weight and power, has no issue doing 4.3 0-60. Funny how the argument changes when a charger from dodge beats Mercedes BMW Audi Jag etc. in power but its "not in the same class"- which proves a point. You dont have to do what everyone else is doing because its "in your class". So what?
Since when is Charger in same class with BMW, MB, AUDI, or Lexus.
The car overall is a built to a much cheaper standard.
If you want to just compare performance #s like 0-60 or 1/4 mile then fine, i am sure the M5 and especially E63amg and RS7 (both being AWD) would fare quite well.
You do realize a 550i does 0-60 in 4.3-4.5sec, GSF would be Lucky to even match those #s.
The car overall is a built to a much cheaper standard.
If you want to just compare performance #s like 0-60 or 1/4 mile then fine, i am sure the M5 and especially E63amg and RS7 (both being AWD) would fare quite well.
You do realize a 550i does 0-60 in 4.3-4.5sec, GSF would be Lucky to even match those #s.