Owned (2x) IS Fs - Thinking About GS F
#3
Facebook Post
The throttle on the GS feels very different as well because it is hinged at the floor, not at the top, so I've had to learn to reposition my foot for smooth throttle control in the GS. The GS has OEM brake pads, and the IS has Carbotech XP12s, so the brake feel is completely different with the GS feeling like high effort compared to the IS, but that's purely pad selection. Both cars stop very quickly and smoothly.
I really love the tech in the GS. I use the HUD all the time and love it. Love being able to put music on a flash drive and play it effortlessly, same with A2DP on my phone. The G meter is cool. Seeing your tire pressures directly is awesome. I do not love the lane assist, the precollision braking, or the radar cruise control. They actually annoy me so I have them turned off all the time. If you like to text and drive, you might find them helpful, but they're aids to poor driving IMHO.
The gearbox feels a little clunky compared to the IS. I have not adjusted the level in it, so it might be a slight level issue, but it really does feel a little sloppier than the IS with the level set correctly. Of course the IS with the level low is way worse than anything...
The seats are harder and the bolsters smaller. The wife prefers long drives in the IS because the seats are more comfortable in her opinion, and I don't disagree. They allow significantly more lateral movement than the IS F seats when cornering at higher g's.
The suspension is more compliant in the GS. Along with more compliant is a propensity for the rear end to wallow a bit when pushed. Not a limiting factor to going fast, but I was a little surprised to find this out when I was pushing the car about 9/10s.
I have a lot of miles on both platforms and switch between them often. If you have a specific question I didn't address, just ask. I'm more than happy to give my impression.
And BTW, neither these cars is anything at all like my Supra.
Last edited by lobuxracer; 01-15-18 at 06:11 PM.
#4
Forgot one really important thing - the lighting on the GS F is so much better than any IS F it's not even funny. The LED headlights totally rock. I would LOVE to retrofit them into my IS F because they are so much better.
The following users liked this post:
lobuxracer (01-15-18)
#6
Congrats as well Lance!! Kids are a blessing
I too am probably going to go the GSF route here later this year possibly as I'm expecting my 3rd in August and need a bigger backseat which fits my situation just perfect
I too am probably going to go the GSF route here later this year possibly as I'm expecting my 3rd in August and need a bigger backseat which fits my situation just perfect
The following users liked this post:
lobuxracer (01-16-18)
Trending Topics
#8
Yes indeed. Still true, although I have found I like the car a lot better with the TVD in track and the mode set to Sport (not Sport+). It still isn't as spunky feeling as my IS F with OS Giken LSD though. I just broke a two and a half week stretch of driving the GS F exclusively after the wife delivered our new son Kyle on January 1st. delivered our new son Kyle on January 1st
She could not drive at all, and the GS F definitely has more back seat than the IS F, so we four were going everywhere in the GS. Yesterday the wife and I got a sitter and went to the movies, so the sitter got the GS and we took the IS (way easier than juggling car seats around). It feels very different, and even with the latest steering ECU installed and calibrated, the steering on the IS feels a lot heavier than the GS. Not in a bad way, but noticeably more effort.
The throttle on the GS feels very different as well because it is hinged at the floor, not at the top, so I've had to learn to reposition my foot for smooth throttle control in the GS. The GS has OEM brake pads, and the IS has Carbotech XP12s, so the brake feel is completely different with the GS feeling like high effort compared to the IS, but that's purely pad selection. Both cars stop very quickly and smoothly.
I really love the tech in the GS. I use the HUD all the time and love it. Love being able to put music on a flash drive and play it effortlessly, same with A2DP on my phone. The G meter is cool. Seeing your tire pressures directly is awesome. I do not love the lane assist, the precollision braking, or the radar cruise control. They actually annoy me so I have them turned off all the time. If you like to text and drive, you might find them helpful, but they're aids to poor driving IMHO.
The gearbox feels a little clunky compared to the IS. I have not adjusted the level in it, so it might be a slight level issue, but it really does feel a little sloppier than the IS with the level set correctly. Of course the IS with the level low is way worse than anything...
The seats are harder and the bolsters smaller. The wife prefers long drives in the IS because the seats are more comfortable in her opinion, and I don't disagree. They allow significantly more lateral movement than the IS F seats when cornering at higher g's.
The suspension is more compliant in the GS. Along with more compliant is a propensity for the rear end to wallow a bit when pushed. Not a limiting factor to going fast, but I was a little surprised to find this out when I was pushing the car about 9/10s.
I have a lot of miles on both platforms and switch between them often. If you have a specific question I didn't address, just ask. I'm more than happy to give my impression.
And BTW, neither these cars is anything at all like my Supra.
She could not drive at all, and the GS F definitely has more back seat than the IS F, so we four were going everywhere in the GS. Yesterday the wife and I got a sitter and went to the movies, so the sitter got the GS and we took the IS (way easier than juggling car seats around). It feels very different, and even with the latest steering ECU installed and calibrated, the steering on the IS feels a lot heavier than the GS. Not in a bad way, but noticeably more effort.
The throttle on the GS feels very different as well because it is hinged at the floor, not at the top, so I've had to learn to reposition my foot for smooth throttle control in the GS. The GS has OEM brake pads, and the IS has Carbotech XP12s, so the brake feel is completely different with the GS feeling like high effort compared to the IS, but that's purely pad selection. Both cars stop very quickly and smoothly.
I really love the tech in the GS. I use the HUD all the time and love it. Love being able to put music on a flash drive and play it effortlessly, same with A2DP on my phone. The G meter is cool. Seeing your tire pressures directly is awesome. I do not love the lane assist, the precollision braking, or the radar cruise control. They actually annoy me so I have them turned off all the time. If you like to text and drive, you might find them helpful, but they're aids to poor driving IMHO.
The gearbox feels a little clunky compared to the IS. I have not adjusted the level in it, so it might be a slight level issue, but it really does feel a little sloppier than the IS with the level set correctly. Of course the IS with the level low is way worse than anything...
The seats are harder and the bolsters smaller. The wife prefers long drives in the IS because the seats are more comfortable in her opinion, and I don't disagree. They allow significantly more lateral movement than the IS F seats when cornering at higher g's.
The suspension is more compliant in the GS. Along with more compliant is a propensity for the rear end to wallow a bit when pushed. Not a limiting factor to going fast, but I was a little surprised to find this out when I was pushing the car about 9/10s.
I have a lot of miles on both platforms and switch between them often. If you have a specific question I didn't address, just ask. I'm more than happy to give my impression.
And BTW, neither these cars is anything at all like my Supra.
The gearbox feels a little clunky compared to the IS. I have not adjusted the level in it, so it might be a slight level issue, but it really does feel a little sloppier than the IS with the level set correctly. Of course the IS with the level low is way worse than anything...
what to you mean by this? how do you adjust the levels ????
#9
The fluid level in the gearbox. On the IS F, the gearbox is very sensitive to low fluid levels. Even a few ounces low caused flaring under certain conditions. The GS F gearbox has not had any flare issues I've noticed, but the clutch engagement has been noticeably clunky on the GS F compared to the IS F. Both have the AA80E gearbox, so it pretty much has to be the TCU programming or the fluid level might be a little low. No way to be sure without setting the fluid level (you can't actually "check" it, you can only adjust it from too much to just right).
#11
I have had both and I personally like the GSF better than the ISF for a lot of the reasons already stated.
In summary, the TVD, better suspension/handling, better seats, and just the newer technology makes the GSF superior to the ISF IMO.
In summary, the TVD, better suspension/handling, better seats, and just the newer technology makes the GSF superior to the ISF IMO.
#12
If you had both at the same time and drove them back to back especially for long distances you might see it differently.
#13
Disagree with TVD, "better" suspension/handling, better seats. I like all three of these things better in the IS F with my OS Giken differential. The IS F always feels planted, never floaty, the GS F is floaty in the back end when you push it. The IS F seats have never made my back writhe in agony on a long trip. The OS Giken diff works better than any setting I have found on the TVD and it is much, much lighter. I like the IS F better especially in the middle of turn 10 at CMP at 105 mph, and I don't like that I have four button presses every time I get in the GS F just to make it drive closer to the IS F in normal mode.
If you had both at the same time and drove them back to back especially for long distances you might see it differently.
If you had both at the same time and drove them back to back especially for long distances you might see it differently.
In any case, both cars are in a different class that a comparison is almost moot.
#14
#15
Congrats Lance on beautiful baby.
ADPLUSONE,
I had my ISF for 6 years and what a unique car. The car was unique in the way it handled compared to RCF and GSF. Compared I quickly realized the ISF is lighter, roll out was very neutral, midrange and top end after headers made car much more responsive. I wish I would have never sold the way the engine responds in respect to drivetrain and chassis is great. The car was extremely reliable over the 110K miles I owned and under my very spirited driving. Also the current owner has 178K and its still going strong. Which further sold me on the F brand.
RCF, was also a very nice car but going from a four door to a 2 door was not the best decision with a 3 and 4 year old. Interestingly enough they had slightly more room in RCF than ISF possibly due to the way the back of the seats are molded. RCF off the bat felt slower. Its true you definitely can feel the weight difference but once became accustomed it felt like a heavy Porsche the way the rear axle felt compared to seat position. (Best way I can explain). The TVD helped make the car. You have to drive to feel under many situations the finite corrections it inputs to the driving experience is a lot of fun.
GSF, I had a little over a week and so so happy I made the purchase. Previously owning the GS 350 Fsport I was very happy with the interior and "ride". the GSF is ofcoarse a level up and all around one of the best cars for the money I have ever driven. the TVD, Larger screen, space, looks, consistent performance and reliability is why I am still with Lexus 8 years later. AND AND I have 8 years of unlimited mileage warranty backed by great brand! How could I go wrong!
ADPLUSONE,
I had my ISF for 6 years and what a unique car. The car was unique in the way it handled compared to RCF and GSF. Compared I quickly realized the ISF is lighter, roll out was very neutral, midrange and top end after headers made car much more responsive. I wish I would have never sold the way the engine responds in respect to drivetrain and chassis is great. The car was extremely reliable over the 110K miles I owned and under my very spirited driving. Also the current owner has 178K and its still going strong. Which further sold me on the F brand.
RCF, was also a very nice car but going from a four door to a 2 door was not the best decision with a 3 and 4 year old. Interestingly enough they had slightly more room in RCF than ISF possibly due to the way the back of the seats are molded. RCF off the bat felt slower. Its true you definitely can feel the weight difference but once became accustomed it felt like a heavy Porsche the way the rear axle felt compared to seat position. (Best way I can explain). The TVD helped make the car. You have to drive to feel under many situations the finite corrections it inputs to the driving experience is a lot of fun.
GSF, I had a little over a week and so so happy I made the purchase. Previously owning the GS 350 Fsport I was very happy with the interior and "ride". the GSF is ofcoarse a level up and all around one of the best cars for the money I have ever driven. the TVD, Larger screen, space, looks, consistent performance and reliability is why I am still with Lexus 8 years later. AND AND I have 8 years of unlimited mileage warranty backed by great brand! How could I go wrong!
The following users liked this post:
MileHIFcar (01-17-18)