Emporer Mark Levinson is not wearing any clothes!
#1
Rookie
Thread Starter
Emporer Mark Levinson is not wearing any clothes!
After hearing all the accolades regarding the Mark Levinson system, I've been trying in earnest over the last month of ownership to see what all the hype is about. I don't want to be the one in the crowd to scream "the emporer is not wearing any clothes", so perhaps I'm missing something. My main complaint is FM. This system has a tinny, trebly sound, without an overall pleasant balance. Sort of like an FM radio from a GM car from the early 70's, where the rear speaker option was ordered. I also own a '97 ES300 with the stock premium sound system, which has a much better balanced sound, pleasing to listen to. On the ML, I've tried increasing bass and mid, while decreasing treble. Also tried with Surround sound function on and off. As far as the DVD-A's are concerned, they are a further source of dissappointment. I've listened to the Beatles "Love" , Pink Floyd "Dark Side of the Moon" and an Austrian orchestra's rendition of Beethoven's 7th, without being impressed with the technology. Sure, CD reproduction is good with the ML, but my home burned CD's seem to do the job as well as the 5.1 productions.
The saving grace is found in the DVD Videos, where Terminator 2 was quite impressive. But I don't want to cruise the CA freeways listening to Arnold blow crap up. I miss the simple things in life...I miss my favorite FM stations. Do I really need to drive the ol' reliable ES to achieve an acceptacle listening experience? I didn't expect Emporer Levinson to be delivered with full regal attire and gold jewelry...but at least he could have sported a modest Speedo and tank top.
Corey
Redondo Beach, CA
'07 GS350 Red/tan
'97 ES300 Navy/taupe - 58K miles
'02 NSX Sil/sil - 8K miles
The saving grace is found in the DVD Videos, where Terminator 2 was quite impressive. But I don't want to cruise the CA freeways listening to Arnold blow crap up. I miss the simple things in life...I miss my favorite FM stations. Do I really need to drive the ol' reliable ES to achieve an acceptacle listening experience? I didn't expect Emporer Levinson to be delivered with full regal attire and gold jewelry...but at least he could have sported a modest Speedo and tank top.
Corey
Redondo Beach, CA
'07 GS350 Red/tan
'97 ES300 Navy/taupe - 58K miles
'02 NSX Sil/sil - 8K miles
Last edited by coreyco; 12-01-08 at 01:02 AM.
#2
Lexus Fanatic
I dont about others, but when I heard both systems I could hear only a slight difference at very high volume. They ask way to much for the system upgrade imo
#3
exclusive matchup
iTrader: (4)
among the newer lexus with mark levinson, i have always said that the gs is the biggest disappointment. even the 2is has better ML system than the 3gs imho, not to mention the ls460 and lx570 reference system totally in a different league
to me, i can hear the difference between the stock and ml system in the 3gs. i wouldn't say it's dramatic but it's enough for me to hear the difference. and for the added features of ml (like dvd capabilities) it's just nice for trips and worth the price upgrade for me. but i very much agree that the sound could be better
i rarely listen to fm, i do CD most of the time. lol i guess when i have to listen to am/fm, that's when i try to figure out about the traffic and i can really care less about the sound quality
to me, i can hear the difference between the stock and ml system in the 3gs. i wouldn't say it's dramatic but it's enough for me to hear the difference. and for the added features of ml (like dvd capabilities) it's just nice for trips and worth the price upgrade for me. but i very much agree that the sound could be better
i rarely listen to fm, i do CD most of the time. lol i guess when i have to listen to am/fm, that's when i try to figure out about the traffic and i can really care less about the sound quality
#6
executive matchup
after listening to the ML system, it's not bad for a "stock" system. it isn't great as most of you have pointed out, but it does the job for 95% of the people (how many GS drivers are actually hi-end audiophiles that are interested in sound quality, imaging and staging?). for those who are more finicky about their sound quality, definitely go with aftermarket as retrospexo suggested.
Trending Topics
#8
I was trying to decide on the ML so brought my own CD to the dealer and played it on an ML and a standard i couldnt tell enough difference to justify the ML price so I went with the standard system.
Of course i have no need for DVD's if you have to have the DVD thing then go for it.
Of course i have no need for DVD's if you have to have the DVD thing then go for it.
#9
However, I got a loaner ES350 with the standard system the other day, and the difference between the ML and non-ML is night and day. I just don't see how one can say that he can't hear a difference.
Mine is set with surround off.
Assuming the range goes from -5 to +5...can't recall the range, and too lazy to go out to the garage to check.
Bass - 2.5
Mid - 0
Trebble - 5
Balance/Fade - center
#10
exclusive matchup
iTrader: (4)
I couldn't have agreed more on what you said about the system, the ML is disappointing.
However, I got a loaner ES350 with the standard system the other day, and the difference between the ML and non-ML is night and day. I just don't see how one can say that he can't hear a difference.
Mine is set with surround off.
Assuming the range goes from -5 to +5...can't recall the range, and too lazy to go out to the garage to check.
Bass - 2.5
Mid - 0
Trebble - 5
Balance/Fade - center
However, I got a loaner ES350 with the standard system the other day, and the difference between the ML and non-ML is night and day. I just don't see how one can say that he can't hear a difference.
Mine is set with surround off.
Assuming the range goes from -5 to +5...can't recall the range, and too lazy to go out to the garage to check.
Bass - 2.5
Mid - 0
Trebble - 5
Balance/Fade - center
#11
Rookie
Thread Starter
["Assuming the range goes from -5 to +5...can't recall the range, and too lazy to go out to the garage to check.
Bass - 2.5
Mid - 0
Trebble - 5
Balance/Fade - center"[/QUOTE]
Thanks for your input, Kev. Are your suggested settings for bass and treble both positive figures? In other words, are you setting bass at +5 and treble at +2.5? If so, perhaps I should give that a try, as I have been diminishing the treble in an effort to get rid of the shrill, trebly overall sound.
Bass - 2.5
Mid - 0
Trebble - 5
Balance/Fade - center"[/QUOTE]
Thanks for your input, Kev. Are your suggested settings for bass and treble both positive figures? In other words, are you setting bass at +5 and treble at +2.5? If so, perhaps I should give that a try, as I have been diminishing the treble in an effort to get rid of the shrill, trebly overall sound.
#13
Rookie
Thread Starter
#14
My mistake then, I thought they would be the same since they're both Lexus, and similar in size. I wouldn't have thought Lexus will spend extra $$ just to design a system to fit each car when they're so similar.
#15
Both positive, but you got them reversed. Bass @ 2.5, and Treb @ 5.