GX - 2nd Gen (2010-2023) Discussion topics related to the 2010 + GX460 models
View Poll Results: What is your MPG?
under 15 MPG
51
27.87%
15-18 MPG
77
42.08%
18-20 MPG
48
26.23%
over 20 MPG
7
3.83%
Voters: 183. You may not vote on this poll

MPG Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-22-17, 05:29 AM
  #241  
GX4602011
Pit Crew
 
GX4602011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: International - Now USA
Posts: 199
Received 58 Likes on 41 Posts
Default GX460 ECO driving; 23-24MPG

OK, this may seem silly to own such a vehicle and to ECO drive it, I guess just to see how many MPG the GX can achieve. Plus, considering that the GX requires high octane fuel, even ECO driving will cost more on fuel compared to the many other alternative, similar (in size, not so much capability), vehicles available today.

On a recent 1300 mile road trip from Maryland to Maine and back my average MPG was an impressive 23-24mpg per tank. This included a little stop and go (traffic congestion) and a few rest stops. Stock tires with about 2+psi all round, consuming 93 octane, nice weather, moderate temps (only needed A/C for a short time). Numbers were hand calculated, which closely matches the display in the instrument cluster. I am pretty impressed with these numbers, I think at 65 steady it would be closer to 22,X and at 55 (flat) getting toward 25. I also noticed that at 55, the GX will downshift on moderate hills, while at 65 there is little downshifting. Now, around town where I live after filling up I see the low teens MPG on the display as expected.

As we all know, the key to ECO driving is very gentle acceleration, early throttle lift off when slowing and driving the speed limits in the right lane. Quick take offs, passing with the throttle down, racing from light to light, then you're probably in the teens. OTOH, I understand that one doesn't choose the GX for fuel economy, so ECO driving are not normal driving tactics for many owners.

Anyone here 'ECO drive' their GX460 with similar or better results?
Old 04-22-17, 07:15 AM
  #242  
Oldmanb777
Pole Position
 
Oldmanb777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Colorado
Posts: 203
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

A few years back, actually more than a few years back, there was an article in a magazine. I think it was Money mag. Gas was going through a high spike in price. The article was something like "you want t pay a 1/3 less for gas?" The point of the article was that at least 1/3 of a gallon of gas is wasted because of poor driving habits. I am sure it was close to correct. See it all the time. Things like race up to the predictable stop at the light, then stand on the brakes. If you see a crosswalk light blinking a block ahead, you can predict the light will be yellow by the time you get there. Take your foot off the gas, the car will only slow 1 or 2 mph by the time you need to brake for the red light, You just saved some gas by using the cars momentum to get you to the stop light, you also saved some brakes, and won't need to replace them as soon. that saved you some money as well. Also saved some tire wear, so all around economical driving habits. It's amazing how little understanding or knowledge of driving MOST American drivers have.
Old 04-22-17, 07:19 AM
  #243  
GoHuskers
Racer
 
GoHuskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,721
Received 165 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

I recently did a 60 miles trip on 60-65mph freeway and I averaged 23+ mpg on 89 e10 fuel. This was a nice Sunday afternoon with nice temperature but AC all the way.

so, I believe your result.
Old 04-22-17, 01:55 PM
  #244  
Acrad
Super Moderator
 
Acrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 9,023
Received 3,641 Likes on 2,385 Posts
Default

I haven't really tried to hyper-mile it in anyway but have already had a few tanks in the 20-21 MPG range. More than happy with this considering the weight and capabilities of this vehicles. I have no doubts in the right conditions one can squeeze a few clicks above the EPA HWY mileage.
Old 04-22-17, 04:58 PM
  #245  
rroman001
Driver
 
rroman001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NJ
Posts: 60
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Ive only owned mine for 2 weeks and I have 700 miles on it. I like using cruise control around 65 and I get 22 MPG on the way to work at 5am. Around town I am in the mid to upper teens. Prior car was a BMW 528 and I was getting 37 on the highway, and 26 combined. I also owned a 2011 Jeep Wrangler that was getting 18 on the Highway and 12 - 13 around town for an average of about 15. I got rid of both cars to get the new GX460. So the way I look at it is I am about even with the 2 cars I once owned. I do drive the GX460 a bit more mildly than I drove the BMW 5 series for obvious reasons.
Old 04-23-17, 11:55 AM
  #246  
MX5NES350
Lead Lap
 
MX5NES350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Received 100 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

See my review on my first road trip HERE You can easily squeeze out 23-24 mpg (compared to my '12 RX that got around 25-26 mpg) on these with what used to be known in the Prius environment as "Hyper-miling" which is kind of what you describe. I am a pretty serene driver with the GX. Not my Miata and my motorcycle... but really the GX isn't a 'fun' car for the streets anyway. My wife has a heavy foot and she can still get some pretty decent mpg's out of it. One thing is the weight of the damned thing. It carries you downhill and has good momentum for getting you up a hill as well. Personally I am not disappointed at all - and it is more than I expected. I use 87 E10 BTW. Ignition retard systems are advanced enough that it takes care of any knocks that you would experience. Only ever on my SC'd, TC'd, or otherwise forced induction vehicles have I ever had to actually use "Premium" fuel and even then I could fill up with 87 or 89 and the either OEM or piggyback programmables were able to compensate. Slight loss of HP but it was minimal to say the least and that was tested on dyno's.
Old 04-23-17, 12:47 PM
  #247  
Acrad
Super Moderator
 
Acrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 9,023
Received 3,641 Likes on 2,385 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MX5NES350
I use 87 E10 BTW. Ignition retard systems are advanced enough that it takes care of any knocks that you would experience.

Good to know 87 is working well for you

EDIT: The vehicle does surprise me though putting suspension in Sport mode in the corners. It definitely doesn't handle like my CX-5 and G35x but pretty amazing considering the weight of this thing.

Last edited by Acrad; 04-23-17 at 12:53 PM.
Old 04-24-17, 07:52 AM
  #248  
MX5NES350
Lead Lap
 
MX5NES350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Received 100 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Acrad35751
Good to know 87 is working well for you

EDIT: The vehicle does surprise me though putting suspension in Sport mode in the corners. It definitely doesn't handle like my CX-5 and G35x but pretty amazing considering the weight of this thing.
While not having the Sport Mode this handles just like I wanted. It has BoF construction and acts like my old Taco but better. Loving it!

Last edited by MX5NES350; 04-24-17 at 07:52 AM. Reason: fat fingers
Old 05-31-17, 12:17 PM
  #249  
meitzler
Driver
 
meitzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: washington
Posts: 93
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Smile GX460 EPA Rating

What is the difference between the 2017 and 2014 Lexus GX 460 drive train. I thought that they were the same. However, I notice that the mileage rating is less for the 2017 model. Did they change something in the drive train.
Old 05-31-17, 12:59 PM
  #250  
tecman
Lead Lap
 
tecman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: GA
Posts: 4,306
Received 864 Likes on 599 Posts
Default Nothing changed with the GX


2017 Ratings Changes

EPA is updating its method for calculating the fuel economy shown on new-car window stickers starting with the 2017 model year.

EPA periodically updates its methodology to account for changes in vehicle technologies, driver behavior, and/or driving conditions. The 2008 changes (see below) were broad revisions to the entire methodology that affected every vehicle.

The 2017 change updates some of the calculations used to estimate fuel economy. The new calculations are based on test data from model year 2011–2016 vehicles. So, they better reflect today's vehicle fleet of more fuel-efficient vehicles and advanced technologies such as hybrids and turbocharged engines.

Most vehicles are not affected by the new calculations. Some fuel economy estimates will decrease by 1 mpg, and a small number may be 2 mpg lower.
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ratings.shtml
Old 07-31-17, 07:39 AM
  #251  
Asimzmn
Driver School Candidate
 
Asimzmn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 11
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Smile GX 460 Gas Mileage HWY

Hi Guys, wanted to check what kind of MPG you guys are getting out of your GX 460? We took our first Road trip from NJ to Washington D.C. this weekend and i must i am very pleasantly surprised with the MPG i got from my GX460. I got 24.6 MPG. i had the cruse set at 65MPH, nothing in tow, nothing on the roof either. Gas used was 91 Premium from Sunoco.



i let the pictures do the talking.
Old 07-31-17, 08:16 AM
  #252  
Acrad
Super Moderator
 
Acrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 9,023
Received 3,641 Likes on 2,385 Posts
Default

That's great MPG... unfortunately too hilly in my area to get. Typical 250 mile MPG for me is right around 20. I have gotten 21-22 MPG a couple times though.
The following users liked this post:
Asimzmn (07-31-17)
Old 07-31-17, 05:52 PM
  #253  
rroman001
Driver
 
rroman001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NJ
Posts: 60
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

The best I have done is about 22.5 on highway. I just left New Jersey and headed up to Lake George. Drove 230 miles with some periods of traffic. Had 5 people in the car, and a fully loaded trunk with a cargo carrier on the roof. I averaged 18.1.
Old 07-31-17, 07:03 PM
  #254  
bbqsoup
Racer
 
bbqsoup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,734
Received 599 Likes on 425 Posts
Default

Wow. That is really good! I used fuel tracker to track each fill up and the best I've gotten was 19mpg
The following users liked this post:
Asimzmn (08-01-17)
Old 08-01-17, 08:19 AM
  #255  
Asimzmn
Driver School Candidate
 
Asimzmn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 11
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

that over head cargo carrier is a big MPG killer, its almost like carrying another GX on top of a GX.


Quick Reply: MPG Discussion



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:29 PM.