Body on Frame vs. Unibody Discussion Continued
#121
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
He is not in charge of the US line up. Toyota/Lexus line up does not use regional model, it's globally managed.
#122
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
You are right, for the North American market, Toyota needs to move the GX and 4Runner to a unibody design, this would be the only way to stay competitive. With Toyota, I would expect them to make an SUV that is just as good as the current BOF design. The 4Runner could survive as a BOF but the GX needs to change sooner than later.
I've driven several JX's, its not a bad vehicle but its awkward looking, a little awkward inside, devoid of any driving enjoyment with the CVT. What it does very well though is move people. Its roomy, comfortable, easy to drive, and has THE best third row seat of any vehicle anywhere outside of a minivan. I'm 6" tall and I can sit comfortably in the third row of a JX.
Lexus could build a great vehicle in this segment. Hopefully they will choose to go the route of the Jeep and LR4/Range Rover and make something that is still substantial and capable though instead of going the overgrown station wagon route.
Last edited by SW17LS; 10-07-13 at 08:43 PM.
#123
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What I was getting at is that he's biased. He's also speaking from a global perspective, not a US specific perspective.
Thats where we disagree. Seeing that there are numerous unibody SUVs that have higher tow ratings, better interior room, better onroad manners, and are better offroad (i.e. have beaten the GX in offroad comparison tests) I would say they absolutely could build a unibody SUV that is every bit as capable as the GX offroad and in towing scenarios, and certainly more capable onroad.
That doesn't mean they will, because as you said it doesn't need to be as capable in the US market, but other manufacturers are and Toyota surely could.
I understand that, but his comment gives us a window into the mindset of the upper management of Toyota when it comes to this issue. You can't discount his comment because its not what you'd like to hear, the man is President of Toyota USA. He's not some guy on the line.
I thought we already well established that majority of the customers in the US do not need real SUVs and a crossover will fare much better. But it won't be as capable as the current GX (and it doesn't need to, not in the US).
That doesn't mean they will, because as you said it doesn't need to be as capable in the US market, but other manufacturers are and Toyota surely could.
He is not in charge of the US line up. Toyota/Lexus line up does not use regional model, it's globally managed.
#124
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't know anything about you but chances are a chief engineer knows something about how to build proper SUVs.
Seeing that there are numerous unibody SUVs that have higher tow ratings, better interior room, better onroad manners, and are better offroad (i.e. have beaten the GX in offroad comparison tests) I would say they absolutely could build a unibody SUV that is every bit as capable as the GX offroad and in towing scenarios, and certainly more capable onroad.
![](http://www.m5zn.com/img/?img=9084a18f35c1f9d.jpg"]http://www.m5zn.com/img/?img=9084a18f35c1f9d.jpg)
Find me a single unibody Jeep (or any other unibody SUV) in there.
Last edited by Quadro; 10-07-13 at 09:03 PM.
#125
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't know anything about you but chances are a chief engineer knows something about how to build proper SUVs.
You have nothing real to back this statement up. By real I mean real use by real owners who need great off-road and durable vehicles. You know Jeep has a great Grand Cherokee in the dunes picture on their UAE web site, it doesn't mean it can really go there, otherwise you'd see them out there.
Let me show you a picture of what people really drive there
It is what it is. Are potential annual sales approaching 50,000 units for a $50-$60k three row unibody SUV worth developing a new model off of an existing chassis for Lexus? I think it probably is.
Last edited by SW17LS; 10-07-13 at 09:17 PM.
#126
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That's like me saying a single GX sold in the US proves it's a viable vehicle for the US.
Last edited by Quadro; 10-07-13 at 09:23 PM.
#127
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You claim they are as capable so show me unibody Jeeps being used in the same conditions as BOF vehicles
Last edited by SW17LS; 10-07-13 at 09:32 PM.
#128
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No you have not. You keep reverting to the argument that people in the US don't do things that require proper SUVs.
You know when Toyota/Lexus US president feels about something more than 10 years ahead that's a definitive statement for you. When a guy from Japan in charge of actually building the stuff makes a statement about present time you call him biased. I've nothing else to add.
You know when Toyota/Lexus US president feels about something more than 10 years ahead that's a definitive statement for you. When a guy from Japan in charge of actually building the stuff makes a statement about present time you call him biased. I've nothing else to add.
#129
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Then you literally have not read 3/4 of what I've posted on the subject both in this thread and in the other thread. I posted paragraphs and paragraphs with links to videos, pictures, trail journals, etc showing unibody SUVs excelling off road. I'm not going to go to the effort again, you can go back and read what I posted if you want to see how I back up my argument.
#130
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Then you literally have not read 3/4 of what I've posted on the subject both in this thread and in the other thread. I posted paragraphs and paragraphs with links to videos, pictures, trail journals, etc showing unibody SUVs excelling off road. I'm not going to go to the effort again, you can go back and read what I posted if you want to see how I back up my argument.
I show you a picture with couple dozens BOF SUVs out in the desert and you counter with some single guy who was brave enough to do the same and god knows if he even continues to do so. Do you have a picture comparable to mine which shows there is a huge owner base in the UAE wheeling their unibody SUVs out in the dunes?
The reason people who need SUVs for military duty don't use unibody is because unibody ain't up to the task. Whether you live in the US, or people in the US don't fight civil wars, have nothing to do with the SUV capabilities we're discussing so I don't know why would you even bring this into the discussion because it's simply irrelevant. You may as well say that Grand Cherokee doesn't get used at the dunes because there are no dunes in the US or you personally is not interested in using it at the dunes.
The reason top 10 places in 2012 Dakar T2 Production class were all taken by BOF SUVs proves unibody have a long way to go. Otherwise you would see them in the results and there should be at least half of them according to you. Well there is none, zero. This is a proof worth more than anything you posted.
You know I tried very hard to find any level benchmark to measure them up. The reason I like Dakar is because it sets cars to compete in the same environment so you can actually compare. The reason I like military duty is because people who pick vehicles have to trust them with their lives so they make sure they get capable and durable machines. Go see what people do with the Land Crusers while bashing in the dunes -- that puts enormous amount of stress on the cars. That's why I use middle east as an example. None of the above shows any significant presence of the unibody SUVs because they ain't capable, not because people in US don't do this.
Any single picture of a single vehicle or 10 minutes video is taken so far out of the context that I don't know how anyone can make anything out of it and that's why I don't take it as a proof of anything. You may as well believe in a pipe dream.
#131
Forum Administrator
![](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/ranks/rank-admin2.gif)
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Guys, this is degrading into bickering. If you guys can't bring some new compelling content and details rather than say 'you didn't read what I wrote' then we'll go ahead and close this thread.
#132
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The BOF vehicles will always be made as long as they are used in the commercial world. In the commercial world, easier/cheaper repairs and durability/longevity are paramount.
BTW – Land Rover (since it is being thrown around here) is still the MOST unreliable brand of vehicle made. In addition, the Heep is only two places higher in the ranking!
Koz
BTW – Land Rover (since it is being thrown around here) is still the MOST unreliable brand of vehicle made. In addition, the Heep is only two places higher in the ranking!
Koz
#133
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I like my Jeep very much, but its a 3 year and done vehicle, the GX is a keeper.
Originally Posted by Quadro
Well I don't take any of them as a proof that unibody SUVs are used as hard as BOF SUVs and have the same capabilities. Not by a long shot. On top of that I posted enough counter-proof which is far more substantial.
#135
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We could put this to bed if you are game. I was invited to a Stealer sponsored Land Rover off-road event this coming week-end (in New Jersey). WE can pit all three and see how they do!
Koz
Koz