GX - 2nd Gen (2010-2023) Discussion topics related to the 2010 + GX460 models

Consumer Reports Avoid 2016

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-21 | 03:14 PM
  #1  
Chaos236's Avatar
Chaos236
Thread Starter
Intermediate
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 472
Likes: 37
From: Ohio
Default Consumer Reports Avoid 2016

Why is that? Marked as least reliable? I want one...
Old 02-16-21 | 04:09 PM
  #2  
WRD4chano's Avatar
WRD4chano
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 539
Likes: 131
Default

no clue, nothing in their used cars analytics states/gives reason to do so.

Name:  ixxwkJL.png
Views: 14
Size:  503 Bytes
Name:  Yo0vCZp.png
Views: 14
Size:  503 Bytes
Old 02-16-21 | 04:41 PM
  #3  
tecman's Avatar
tecman
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 4,350
Likes: 895
From: GA
Default

got a link please. I have never heard to avoid any GX460 due to reliability.
The following users liked this post:
corpnupe85 (02-21-21)
Old 02-17-21 | 09:02 AM
  #4  
ASE's Avatar
ASE
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 1,092
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by Chaos236
Why is that? Marked as least reliable? I want one...
While Consumer Reports can be useful reference ... specific to their comparative and measured (lab based) product testing ... the consumer ratings represent data collected from consumers, many of whom have absolutely no understanding (no clue) as to the actual root cause or severity of a "problem" ... all they know is that they "had a problem" in a specific survey category ... so while this data may be useful as an indicator, it is by no means an absolute measure and should be weighed accordingly.

Specific to automotive reviews, I completely lost interest in Consumer Reports back in the late 80's when the number and location of cup holders became central to their review emphasis. They should stick with appliances and carpeting, and leave the automotive side to those with industry specific expertise who do not allow the core fundamentals to get diluted with peripheral considerations.

Last edited by ASE; 02-17-21 at 09:13 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by ASE:
corpnupe85 (02-21-21), mike995134 (02-26-21)
Old 02-17-21 | 09:05 AM
  #5  
Romanova's Avatar
Romanova
Racer
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 764
From: TX
Default

2021 and people rely on Consumer Reports still? There are much better metrics these days for making purchase decisions...
The following 5 users liked this post by Romanova:
corpnupe85 (02-21-21), IanB2 (02-17-21), mike995134 (02-26-21), perfctreig (02-17-21), Piney1 (01-29-23)
Old 02-17-21 | 11:42 AM
  #6  
shmelvin1's Avatar
shmelvin1
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 148
Likes: 50
From: WA
Default

What would make a 2016 any different from a 2010 - 2019, aren't they mechanically identical?
The following 2 users liked this post by shmelvin1:
corpnupe85 (02-21-21), IanB2 (02-17-21)
Old 02-17-21 | 01:25 PM
  #7  
Statman's Avatar
Statman
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 134
Likes: 28
From: CO
Default

Originally Posted by ASE
While Consumer Reports can be useful reference ... specific to their comparative and measured (lab based) product testing ... the consumer ratings represent data collected from consumers, many of whom have absolutely no understanding (no clue) as to the actual root cause or severity of a "problem" ... all they know is that they "had a problem" in a specific survey category ... so while this data may be useful as an indicator, it is by no means an absolute measure and should be weighed accordingly.

Specific to automotive reviews, I completely lost interest in Consumer Reports back in the late 80's when the number and location of cup holders became central to their review emphasis. They should stick with appliances and carpeting, and leave the automotive side to those with industry specific expertise who do not allow the core fundamentals to get diluted with peripheral considerations.
Yes, it is wise to be suspicious/skeptical of the comparisons and analysis they do including appliances BTW. Their sample sizes are extremely small and are biased.
Old 02-17-21 | 02:17 PM
  #8  
shmelvin1's Avatar
shmelvin1
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 148
Likes: 50
From: WA
Default

Also when it comes to any comparison/review and dare I even say....Forum, the negatives always out way the positives. We are all so quick to leave a negative review, but many well deserved positive ones go unpublished...JMHO
Old 02-17-21 | 03:43 PM
  #9  
Lavrishevo's Avatar
Lavrishevo
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,176
Likes: 310
From: NJ
Default

Consumer reports relies pretty much solely on reported problems by the base of owners it surveys. Could be 2016 was a popular year too with overall numbers. I find their repointing unbiased.
Old 02-19-21 | 06:04 PM
  #10  
TXS3's Avatar
TXS3
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 17
Likes: 2
From: TX
Default

Originally Posted by Lavrishevo
Consumer reports relies pretty much solely on reported problems by the base of owners it surveys. Could be 2016 was a popular year too with overall numbers. I find their repointing unbiased.
odd, I just read CR last year before the Covid hit. It gave very good reviews
Old 02-19-21 | 07:14 PM
  #11  
Statman's Avatar
Statman
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 134
Likes: 28
From: CO
Default

Originally Posted by Lavrishevo
Consumer reports relies pretty much solely on reported problems by the base of owners it surveys. Could be 2016 was a popular year too with overall numbers. I find their repointing unbiased.
You realize to be in CR you have to pay...unbiased..yeah right.
Old 02-19-21 | 07:19 PM
  #12  
DaveGS4's Avatar
DaveGS4
Forum Administrator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 31,628
Likes: 2,361
From: North Carolina
Default

Folks, many threads with people who like CR and those who don't (and many have gone off the rails). Let's keep this specifically on the rating of the GX please.
The following users liked this post:
dwh13 (02-23-21)
Old 02-19-21 | 08:44 PM
  #13  
ASE's Avatar
ASE
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 1,092
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by DaveGS4
Folks, many threads with people who like CR and those who don't (and many have gone off the rails). Let's keep this specifically on the rating of the GX please.
Discussing rating without context on the source of such rating (the data) is informative Nothing even close to approaching "off the rails" in the above posts from what I can see
The following users liked this post:
IanB2 (02-24-21)
Old 02-19-21 | 08:49 PM
  #14  
DaveGS4's Avatar
DaveGS4
Forum Administrator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 31,628
Likes: 2,361
From: North Carolina
Default

I'm talking about comments like the below that turn into a huge off topic debate, not avoiding the name of the publication or the ratings.

Originally Posted by Statman
You realize to be in CR you have to pay...unbiased..yeah right.
Let's get this thread back on topic, if you want to discuss further please PM me.
Old 02-20-21 | 08:27 AM
  #15  
Acrad's Avatar
Acrad
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 9,070
Likes: 3,685
From: USA
Default

Only thing noteworthy on 2016 would have been the introduction of Enform Remote & Service Connect

Perhaps the bad OTA update for that year made some give it a black mark on Infotainment?

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/...s-infotainment

I no longer have a subscription to CU...

I had one for years but just started using it less and less so cancelled it last year.

If someone has access it would be this area to show whatever problem area they were highlighting.

https://www.consumerreports.org/cars...1/reliability/








Quick Reply: Consumer Reports Avoid 2016



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:50 PM.