Regular gas 350h
#31
I think it's up to the owner to decide what gas they prefer to put in. The manual does say both works. Some may prefer to use premium as a preventive measure based on the manual.
The following users liked this post:
romer (11-29-23)
#32
preventative measure against automobile axxidents
#34
Intermediate
Premium gasoline has the same "thermal efficiency" as regular. The only difference is in the type (and quantity) of different additives. Some are added to keep your fuel system clean and the others to adjust octane number.
The octane number indicates gasoline ability to resist spontaneous and premature combustion / explosion from compression in cylinders.
Gas/ air mixture in cylinder does not burn instantly (like explosion), but over period of milliseconds, all while piston is moving down, past dead point which is a full compression. Low octane gas, if used in high-compression engine which is designed for high octane gas (premium), will explode and not burn in controlled process. If gas/air mixture does not burn but explodes (due to gas not resisting heat from compression), it will produce hard blow (aka knocking sound). Over time these “blows” will damage your engine bearings in crankshaft and wrist pin.
Use gasoline with octane number per car manual. Using gas with number higher vs stated in manual makes no impact on engine performance or gas mileage, and is waste of money.
If car manual state that "premium is required", use premium. If it says "premium is recommended", that means that the engine is designed to run on either and you can safely use regular gasoline. Of course, when using regular gas your can ECU will adjust timing to prevent "knocking". Adjusting timing results in slight power drop, but NO damage to the engine.
#35
With regards to what the different octane fuel is and isn’t. That’s not really the point I’m making and the general motherhood statements are fine for all intent and purposes. Not debating that at all.
what I’m highlighting here are the specificity of the fuel application to the engine in the NX350h.
#36
Intermediate
What you see is not a gasoline efficiency difference but a difference in engine efficiency. As I mentioned, engine will adjust timing for regular, thus adjusting/loosing efficiency. Both gasolines have the same efficiency. Should you use premium or regular in engine that is designed for regular, you will not see a difference in "efficiency".
Last edited by Lex2000TL; 03-30-22 at 04:29 AM.
The following 3 users liked this post by Lex2000TL:
#37
What you see is not a gasoline efficiency difference but a difference in engine efficiency. As I mentioned, engine will adjust timing for regular, thus adjusting/loosing efficiency. Both gasolines have the same efficiency. Should you use premium or regular in engine that is designed for regular, you will not see a difference in "efficiency".
#38
Use regular fuel and use BG44K every 10,000 miles.
#39
Loved Thermodynamics in college getting BSEE
That’s what I’m referring to - BTE, brake thermal efficiency. The engine is more efficient at converting the same amount of fuel to mechanical energy when the fuel is Tier 2.
https://youtu.be/jagNsS9MxFQ
https://youtu.be/jagNsS9MxFQ
The following users liked this post:
BeamerDude (01-28-23)
#41
So if 91 octane is way better than 87, then 100 would be the bomb, right? I filled up for the first time yesterday, and drove by a station that used to sell 100 octane racing gas from one of its pumps. They no longer did so, but did have 5 gallon containers of Sunoco Race Fuel for sale.
As I left that station, I saw that there was another station down the street that does sell racing fuel from one if its pumps. It was $9.95 per gallon, and did not indicate the octane rating, so I passed.
As I left that station, I saw that there was another station down the street that does sell racing fuel from one if its pumps. It was $9.95 per gallon, and did not indicate the octane rating, so I passed.
#42
I've never had any Shell V-Power premium petrol issues for my German cars. I will be continuing to use their premium fuel in the NX450H+ to avoid ethanol (despite the high cost in British Columbia). Ethanol is corrosive, and if you never burn fuel in the 450H+, you're asking for problems. As pointed out here by the Car Care Nut.
.
Last edited by Kusala; 04-24-22 at 09:40 AM. Reason: Fix link
The following users liked this post:
smish (12-03-23)
#43
We compared seat of the pants differences between regular and premium in the Volvo XC90 3.2 L and noticed none. Perhaps we should have done some range tests to see if the car would go further on a tank of premium but we did not. So it has been regular fuel for years while the manual as I recall recommends premium.
I have also been told that premium fuels here do not have any ethanol, something else to consider.
Back in the seventies a few buddies and I did a trip to Mexico in a 64 Impala with a 283 engine. North of the border it ran fine on regular but in Mexico we couldn't use the cheaper Pemex grade without hearing the pinging.
Edit: In the winter of 77/78 I worked in Edmonton and one -40 day the 69 Fairlane 289 would not start, even after being plugged in and cranking over nicely. I used to fill up at a station called Discount Gas but for the rest of the winter I used premium from a name brand station and no more problems.
I have also been told that premium fuels here do not have any ethanol, something else to consider.
Back in the seventies a few buddies and I did a trip to Mexico in a 64 Impala with a 283 engine. North of the border it ran fine on regular but in Mexico we couldn't use the cheaper Pemex grade without hearing the pinging.
Edit: In the winter of 77/78 I worked in Edmonton and one -40 day the 69 Fairlane 289 would not start, even after being plugged in and cranking over nicely. I used to fill up at a station called Discount Gas but for the rest of the winter I used premium from a name brand station and no more problems.
Last edited by vincej; 10-11-22 at 07:10 AM.
#44
We compared seat of the pants differences between regular and premium in the Volvo XC90 3.2 L and noticed none. Perhaps we should have done some range tests to see if the car would go further on a tank of premium but we did not. So it has been regular fuel for years while the manual as I recall recommends premium.
I have also been told that premium fuels here do not have any ethanol, something else to consider.
Back in the seventies a few buddies and I did a trip to Mexico in a 64 Impala with a 283 engine. North of the border it ran fine on regular but in Mexico we couldn't use the cheaper Pemex grade without hearing the pinging.
Edit: In the winter of 77/78 I worked in Edmonton and one -40 day the 69 Fairlane 289 would not start, even after being plugged in and cranking over nicely. I used to fill up at a station called Discount Gas but for the rest of the winter I used premium from a name brand station and no more problems.
I have also been told that premium fuels here do not have any ethanol, something else to consider.
Back in the seventies a few buddies and I did a trip to Mexico in a 64 Impala with a 283 engine. North of the border it ran fine on regular but in Mexico we couldn't use the cheaper Pemex grade without hearing the pinging.
Edit: In the winter of 77/78 I worked in Edmonton and one -40 day the 69 Fairlane 289 would not start, even after being plugged in and cranking over nicely. I used to fill up at a station called Discount Gas but for the rest of the winter I used premium from a name brand station and no more problems.
YMMV,
MidCow3