Mark Levinson -vs- Pioneer - The Showdown
#16
Originally Posted by Maximus330
I have heard this from numerous sources and dealers that the reason why Levinson wasn't on the IS350 was due to sticker shock. In other words, Lexus didn't want the public to feel that the IS was too expensive at launch and decided against putting Levinson to hold down the costs. What a crock of ****!
fyi, the vehicle I ordered today that I hope to have in a few weeks has ML and I'm in shock right now...but it wasn't cause by no sticker.
#17
Originally Posted by aerodragon
what kind of songs do you have on your CD? I've been looking for a CD to really test out the Mark Levinson system?
1. If I could Go! - Angie Martinez
2. Bump, Bump, Bump - B2K
3. Baby Boy - Sean Pual
4. No Scrubs - TLC
5. No Sleep Till Brooklyn - Beastie Boys
6. Yeah! - Usher
7. Posse On Broadway - Sir Mix-a-Lot
8 Run It! - Chris Brown
9. Someday - Nickelback
#19
Originally Posted by kensteele
Ok, don't say I didn't tell you so. About ML. Miss out on it if you want.
Ok, I get it now. Lexus did their research and all the smart people from New York to LA, on the east coast and the west coast, Miami to Seattle, ML is just too expensive for you, no way would you want this crap. But we gotta build a few ML cars, so why not just send them to the midwest, like to Kansas, Iowa, and Nebraska, and maybe even Chicago. They'll buy them there, the dealerships are so few and far between, they'll never know how much cash they'll save if they had the option to purchase sans ML. Well, I'll take it!
Ok, I get it now. Lexus did their research and all the smart people from New York to LA, on the east coast and the west coast, Miami to Seattle, ML is just too expensive for you, no way would you want this crap. But we gotta build a few ML cars, so why not just send them to the midwest, like to Kansas, Iowa, and Nebraska, and maybe even Chicago. They'll buy them there, the dealerships are so few and far between, they'll never know how much cash they'll save if they had the option to purchase sans ML. Well, I'll take it!
1. Just because a few of us want ML, does not mean that lots of people want it.
2. Lexus didnt screw up just because we didnt get ML. For all we know, their research was spot-on and they were very successful.
3. Region dealers and the corporate regional sales managers set allocations for their regions. That accounts for the disparity in allocations.
4. To satisfy every customer's individual taste, Lexus would had to have allocated an immense combination of options packages, colors and upgrades. They would also have to know EXACTLY where to allocate them. They did their market research, but they are not telepathic.
Don't forget, you CAN get exactly what you want; you just have to have a little patience while your order is processed.
Think about what would happen at McDonalds if they accounted for every possible taste that might walk in the door, rather than building a small inventory of burgers for the majority of people they expect to serve.
After hearing ML, I wouldnt touch an IS without it. That doesnt mean that everyone shares that value and that Lexus is misguided in their assumptions. They know more about their market than any of us, and I'm willing to believe that they know what they're doing.
#22
Originally Posted by GonzoBuggs
Lexus didnt screw up just because we didnt get ML. For all we know, their research was spot-on and they were very successful.
After hearing ML, I wouldnt touch an IS without it.
After hearing ML, I wouldnt touch an IS without it.
But imagine, if and when, a new allocation of IS finally comes in with ML (among other bells and whistles). Lexus dealerships can say "hey, you get this exclusive ML system that everyone's been waiting for. We're not lowering the price on something this exclusive..."
Suddenly, BAM! The prices do not drop from MSRP and you have to (a) buy it then at MSRP because you're sick of waiting or (b) wait another 3-4 months before you get a discount. INGENIOUS!!!
#23
Originally Posted by PhilipMSPT
Here is my impression: Lexus (and enthusiasts) hyped up ML because it truly is a great system. People will wait for it, and they will wait for prices to drop. Everyone is guessing that prices will lower well below MSRP in about 3-4 months.
But imagine, if and when, a new allocation of IS finally comes in with ML (among other bells and whistles). Lexus dealerships can say "hey, you get this exclusive ML system that everyone's been waiting for. We're not lowering the price on something this exclusive..."
Suddenly, BAM! The prices do not drop from MSRP and you have to (a) buy it then at MSRP because you're sick of waiting or (b) wait another 3-4 months before you get a discount. INGENIOUS!!!
But imagine, if and when, a new allocation of IS finally comes in with ML (among other bells and whistles). Lexus dealerships can say "hey, you get this exclusive ML system that everyone's been waiting for. We're not lowering the price on something this exclusive..."
Suddenly, BAM! The prices do not drop from MSRP and you have to (a) buy it then at MSRP because you're sick of waiting or (b) wait another 3-4 months before you get a discount. INGENIOUS!!!
Makes sense to me.
#24
95% of the menu at McDonalds is the same in every single franchise in 50 states. They might have the moose burger in Alaska and a pineapple salad in Hawaii and mango flavoured shakes in Florida, but I have to believe this Lexus allocation scheme is based on something other than "market research." Oh, well...I guess we'll never know for sure. BTW, the hint of sarcasm in my last post, I should have used red, that's what we normally do in other forums.
#25
Don't forget what I said in one of my earlier posts above. I got this information from the people who made this decision. I know coming from me to you it's hearsay, but I'm quite clear about why they did what they did.
I did share some of the conversation with FlipSide, but would rather not make it public since I was not given permission to do so.
As for the McDonalds analogy, what I was trying to convey is that most people want a BigMac as-is. Some people come in and want no pickles, or no sauce, or extra onions. If McDonalds were to try to cater to those people, they would end up with a bunch of stale inventory, and they would have to guess about a massive number of combos.
I think it is reasonable to assume that a bunch of standard Big Macs (Premium Plus) were allocated and those who want extra onions (Mark Levinson) would have to order it and wait while their burger is cooked.
I did share some of the conversation with FlipSide, but would rather not make it public since I was not given permission to do so.
As for the McDonalds analogy, what I was trying to convey is that most people want a BigMac as-is. Some people come in and want no pickles, or no sauce, or extra onions. If McDonalds were to try to cater to those people, they would end up with a bunch of stale inventory, and they would have to guess about a massive number of combos.
I think it is reasonable to assume that a bunch of standard Big Macs (Premium Plus) were allocated and those who want extra onions (Mark Levinson) would have to order it and wait while their burger is cooked.
#26
Originally Posted by Rockville
Why is the ML so much better? It is more powerful, uses more exotic materials like titanium tweeters and Neodium magnets for its speakers. It uses Digital Sound Processing which reduces signal and harmonic distortion. It usually has an extra center channel speaker and now comes with 5.1 Dolby surround sound. Is it worth it? You bet it is.
Now why does the ML sound so good? They figured out the cabin area, speaker locations, etc and threw in a lot of processing. Equalization too. Not sure if there is any time delay management, but they did their homework. Now if they can only get their drivers to last longer and not burn out...
Percy
#28
Originally Posted by Percy
Titanium tweeters and Neo magnets aren't the end all for any audio. Sure, they seem like more "advanced" materials, but they really aren't, especially if they have problems with resonance and ringing. I have YET to see a metal dome or hear a metal dome tweeter that doesn't have the ringing problem. That includes Focal, Diamond Audio, JBL, Infinity (not metal, but similar to ribbon), MB Quart (ESPECIALLY MBQ) and others. For the record, it is MUCH more difficult to produce a soft dome tweeter than it is for a titanium/aluminum tweeter. More steps involved rather than just "punching out a can" to get the desired shape. I'd GLADLY swap out the metal dome tweeters in the ML system for a pair of Dynaudio MD100's. Much more enjoyable to listen to. Listen to the "s" sounds and any horns or trumpets. Orchestra music will be very revealing of any ringing, especially when it comes to strings. High hats also will reveal any ringing. Most untrained ears can't pick out the ringing since they are so used to it. A/B/A listen to a metal dome versus a nice soft dome (dyn, ads) and you'll notice a difference.
Now why does the ML sound so good? They figured out the cabin area, speaker locations, etc and threw in a lot of processing. Equalization too. Not sure if there is any time delay management, but they did their homework. Now if they can only get their drivers to last longer and not burn out...
Percy
Now why does the ML sound so good? They figured out the cabin area, speaker locations, etc and threw in a lot of processing. Equalization too. Not sure if there is any time delay management, but they did their homework. Now if they can only get their drivers to last longer and not burn out...
Percy
So do you think its better not to get the ML system and just upgrade the stock system to Dynaudio?
#29
If you can get the ML and then upgrade to Dyn, it's worth it. If you can't get ML and still upgrade to Dyn, it's more than worth it also.
Can't really lose either way, but with the ML/Dyn combo, it'll be a heck of a combo!
Percy
Can't really lose either way, but with the ML/Dyn combo, it'll be a heck of a combo!
Percy