rwd vs awd
#1
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
rwd vs awd
I was just looking over whether or not to purchase the is250awd or the automatic. I'm thinking about the automatic just because it's cheaper but then I also like the added safety from the awd. I've been in an accident before because I lost traction going down a slight slope while it was raining--so I'm pretty paranoid about that kind of thing now. Do you guys think the awd would be worth the extra 3k if hard rain is the worst weather I'll encounter living in California? How much difference would the awd make in slippery conditions? Is the traction control enough to pretty much keep me out of accidents that involve losing traction? (btw, I dont know much about traction control etc). Thanks!
#2
Cycle Savant
iTrader: (5)
Think of it another way: the way you drive is the biggest factor in safety.
If you drive the 350 safely, you should have no trouble. Get good tires and drive safely in the rain.
If you drive poorly in the rain, the AWD will help, but it isn't the first source of safety. All other safety nannies are found on both models.
Go with the 350 and drive safely in the rain. This is California!!! We don't need AWD!!!
If you drive the 350 safely, you should have no trouble. Get good tires and drive safely in the rain.
If you drive poorly in the rain, the AWD will help, but it isn't the first source of safety. All other safety nannies are found on both models.
Go with the 350 and drive safely in the rain. This is California!!! We don't need AWD!!!
#4
Racer
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by acl15
I was just looking over whether or not to purchase the is250awd or the automatic. I'm thinking about the automatic just because it's cheaper but then I also like the added safety from the awd. I've been in an accident before because I lost traction going down a slight slope while it was raining--so I'm pretty paranoid about that kind of thing now. Do you guys think the awd would be worth the extra 3k if hard rain is the worst weather I'll encounter living in California? How much difference would the awd make in slippery conditions? Is the traction control enough to pretty much keep me out of accidents that involve losing traction? (btw, I dont know much about traction control etc). Thanks!
#5
IS 250 RWD with good tires brakes and traction control should be no problem in the rain. Just drive safely and you wont have to worry. AWD is good but if your skidin out your skidin out you know.
#6
Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
dont need AWD in CA it doesnt snow heavily there, just get RWD you have VDIM traction control to help and go easy on the gas in inclement weather and keep your tires well maintained thats all there is to it
Apart from that, CA's can't drive in the rain. The first rain of the season brings out all the accidents and people driving 10mph because they're afraid. It's hilarious, coming from the east or south where people can handle a little water.
You don't need AWD for rain.
To the other poster, VDIM doesn't come on the IS250 RWD.
#7
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The IS 250's AWD system defaults to a 30/70 front/rear torque split, though it will shift to 50/50 depending on wheel slip so for whatever reason your wheels are slipping the AWD will grip the road better than a straight RWD car.
Trending Topics
#9
Take a look at the Road and Track AWD sports sedan comparo article from last month (where the IS scored 4th but drew a lot of high-praise but lost mostly due to lack of oomph by the way). As a side note in their comparo, they also compared a RWD G35 vs. the AWD G35x. While they expected the RWD to handle better, they were surprised to see that the AWD G35 outperformed its RWD brother in every category in terms of handling. Now, the G35 is obviously not the same as an IS but they are both RWD biased until there is slip detected so I think the results may be applicable.
Also, in various forums, I have seen a many posts citing a serious loss of control or an accident that they experienced as the reason to switch to an AWD version of the same model. Many involved wet conditions, tight, fast highway ramps etc where the owner felt that would not be a problem in an AWD car. Anecdotes are anecdotes and they are not rules. However, I have never heard someone say that they had a serious accident due to poor handling in an AWD car as a reason to switch to the RWD version of the same car. Before anyone starts to ask if I would take an IS 250 AWD over a Ferrari for handling, I want to clarify that I am talking about AWD vs RWD in sport sedans. I would personally get it in a sports sedan.
My 2 cents worth.
Also, in various forums, I have seen a many posts citing a serious loss of control or an accident that they experienced as the reason to switch to an AWD version of the same model. Many involved wet conditions, tight, fast highway ramps etc where the owner felt that would not be a problem in an AWD car. Anecdotes are anecdotes and they are not rules. However, I have never heard someone say that they had a serious accident due to poor handling in an AWD car as a reason to switch to the RWD version of the same car. Before anyone starts to ask if I would take an IS 250 AWD over a Ferrari for handling, I want to clarify that I am talking about AWD vs RWD in sport sedans. I would personally get it in a sports sedan.
My 2 cents worth.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post