IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013) Discussion about the 2006+ model IS models

Base is 350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-23-06, 10:41 PM
  #1  
LeXusIS714
Driver
Thread Starter
 
LeXusIS714's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ca
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Base is 350

what the best deal that people are getting right now. I wanted a 250 with Nav but i think power is more important for me. Anyone have the same feeling ?
Old 04-23-06, 10:58 PM
  #2  
imaputz
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
imaputz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

must have NAV..... I don't think you will enjoy the IS350 as a stock w/o NAV.

Trust me... you want NAV,
Old 04-24-06, 04:22 AM
  #3  
tqlla3k
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
tqlla3k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Power is more important. However, I would suggest taking out every other option just to get nav. You can get 18's later.
Old 04-24-06, 06:42 AM
  #4  
Lem144
Intermediate
 
Lem144's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tqlla3k
Power is more important. However, I would suggest taking out every other option just to get nav. You can get 18's later.
Gas is nuts. You really sure you need all that power? There was a line at the station selling for $2.85 here on Saturday. CRAZY!
Old 04-24-06, 07:45 AM
  #5  
tqlla3k
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
tqlla3k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thats true, gas is bad. But the 350, doesnt get bad mileage 21/28 vs 28/32

My cousin in his 250 gets 25MPG, he is on the accel a lot.

I get 21MPG when I drive normally, 22-23MPG when I am in gas saver mode... and 27.4 on this last trip(180mi highway)
Old 04-24-06, 07:49 AM
  #6  
Premier
Pit Crew
 
Premier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Get the 350, I think you'll regret getting the 250. I had the same feelings as you i was set on the 250 but once i drove both of them then the decision was obvious =P. Best deal I'm working with is $44,000 tax and all included.
Old 04-24-06, 07:50 AM
  #7  
mtnduc
Driver
 
mtnduc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: CO
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I have Nav in my car and I never ever use it. In fact, I usually have the screen off. It is a total waste of money unless you drive 1000's of miles in LA, SFO or NYC.
The only reason I have Nav is the dealer felt bad when they couldn't find the base car I wanted and threw it in.
All I wanted was the Spyder rims, spoiler and the 3.5l engine. The base Prem Pkg is just fine as far as options go but, you will probably be limited in what you can find as far as color combos go.
Old 04-24-06, 07:58 AM
  #8  
RaZoRaMoN
Lead Lap
 
RaZoRaMoN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would get the 350. It would be easier and maybe cheaper to add an aftermarket nav than to add 100 HP to your car. Just my $.02.
Old 04-24-06, 08:31 AM
  #9  
Dabigman
Lead Lap
 
Dabigman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bushes
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I got the Base and no nav, exactly what I wanted. I have no use for Nav as I know by heart the roads in most cases or check Mapquest before I leave and I live in DFW so the area is pretty big.

I'll never pay extra for Nav unless it has a real-time Traffic Assist feature.
Old 04-24-06, 09:09 AM
  #10  
eg6turbo
Rookie
 
eg6turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ca
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dabigman
I got the Base and no nav, exactly what I wanted. I have no use for Nav as I know by heart the roads in most cases or check Mapquest before I leave and I live in DFW so the area is pretty big.

I'll never pay extra for Nav unless it has a real-time Traffic Assist feature.
im with ^^^^ i got my car for about $39k otd here in the bay area..just the is350 with 18's
Old 04-24-06, 10:49 AM
  #11  
twkid84
Pole Position
 
twkid84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i got a base 350
after tax $392xxx

certainly buy the 350
you step on the gas pedal more than you touch the screen
Old 04-24-06, 11:06 AM
  #12  
is4me2
Lead Lap
 
is4me2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Gas prices here at a cheap station yesterday - 91 was $3.10 and 93 was $3.15. The IS350 requires 91 or higher. I've only averaged 18 mpg since I got the car - all in-town driving.

Regarding Nav. To me that is the best thing about the car and I don't use the Nav to map my routes. I use it for the Bluetooth phone function. It is much safer than having a phone stuck to your ear......although other drivers seeing you talking to yourself might make them wonder
I use it for the calendar and appts, lowering/raising temps, etc. Don't want to go on and on but there are lots of features of the Nav other than mapping your routes.
Old 04-24-06, 03:29 PM
  #13  
TurkEclisp
Rookie
 
TurkEclisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

definitely the 350.. I never had NAV would like to of had it but its too much and i wouldnt use it much.. unless u travel alot get the 350 for sure..
Old 04-24-06, 04:43 PM
  #14  
Ramon
Lexus Champion

 
Ramon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That a decision that only you can answer really... What is more important to YOU? Me personally, I knew my next car HAD to have NAV. My sense of direction isn't the greatest, and the 250 didn't excite me as much as the 350 so I opted for a 350 with nav. Obviously that is going to cost more, but if you want both, I suggest you wait and save up a big enough down payment to bring your monthly down to where you want it. New cars are a big investment that you'll have for a few years most likely, might as well get the one you want instead of regretting the pruchase later.
Old 04-24-06, 04:50 PM
  #15  
casey225
Pole Position
 
casey225's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would always take power over "fluff", nav is definitely a personal opinion. If you travel to alot of unfamiliar places, it's pretty cool. If you don't, definitely not worth the price IMHO. We have it on one of our vehicles and have rarely used it. Just depends on your driving habits. You will enjoy the extra 100 horses EVERY time you hit the gas pedal, though .


Quick Reply: Base is 350



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:22 AM.