IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013) Discussion about the 2006+ model IS models

Why so many Mods?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-06, 07:07 PM
  #16  
sab504
Pit Crew
iTrader: (1)
 
sab504's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: LA
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Like someone said, modding is a hobby. Personally I love it because it makes my car a little different from all the other 2IS.
Old 06-23-06, 07:17 PM
  #17  
Bichon
Super Moderator
 
Bichon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,287
Received 267 Likes on 237 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shinobi-X
If they can prove that the modification you did, caused a premature malfunction, it will void the warranty.
As those who have crossed swords with Audi can attest, the protections offered by the federal Magnuson-Moss warranty act are not nearly as strong as the manufacturers of aftermarket performance parts would like you to believe.

Essentially, the relavant part of the act prevents "tie-in sales", e.g., they can't require you to use genuine Lexus oil filters as a condition of maintaining your warranty unless they provide them for free.

That's NOT the same thing as saying you can modify the car with parts intended to make it perform in excess of original design specs. And while the aftermarket sellers will often say (as Shinobi-X did) that the car company has to "prove" that your mod caused the malfunction, in reality many people have had their warranty coverage denied simply due to the presence of aftermarket performance parts that could have stressed the failed system.
Old 06-23-06, 07:45 PM
  #18  
kensteele
Lexus Champion
 
kensteele's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 2,726
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i wouldn't think they had to prove anything unless and until they are in mediation.
Old 06-24-06, 04:41 AM
  #19  
ecr527
Lexus Champion
 
ecr527's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: South FLA
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

People mod their cars because they always want to have something that's a little different from everyone else's. I'm sure some sort of mod will make it onto your car one way or another otherwise you wouldn't be on these forums.
Old 06-24-06, 08:47 AM
  #20  
Lets Drive
Racer
iTrader: (3)
 
Lets Drive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 1,345
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bichon
As those who have crossed swords with Audi can attest, the protections offered by the federal Magnuson-Moss warranty act are not nearly as strong as the manufacturers of aftermarket performance parts would like you to believe.

Essentially, the relavant part of the act prevents "tie-in sales", e.g., they can't require you to use genuine Lexus oil filters as a condition of maintaining your warranty unless they provide them for free.

That's NOT the same thing as saying you can modify the car with parts intended to make it perform in excess of original design specs. And while the aftermarket sellers will often say (as Shinobi-X did) that the car company has to "prove" that your mod caused the malfunction, in reality many people have had their warranty coverage denied simply due to the presence of aftermarket performance parts that could have stressed the failed system.
Under the Magnuson-Moss Act, a dealer must prove, not just vocalize, that aftermarket equipment caused the need for repairs before it can deny warranty coverage. If the dealer cannot prove such a claim — or it provides a questionable explanation — it is your legal right to demand compliance with the warranty.

That being quoted, the law is the law, no matter how any entity will try and work around it. I'm sorry, but I've seen the bogus "voiding of warranty" claims dismissed entirely too often for it to be declared a weak case by any means, and no aftermarket part manufacturer had to attempt to verify anything. This is an issue which can be dealt with at the dealer level most times, as they are usually not willing to get too in depth with their claims...if not, then one should not be modifying their car, plain and simple.

Also speaking from personal experience, the reality of the situation largely depends on your ability to present the case; I just assisted a friend in recieving an engine replacement for an SE-R w/ cat-back exhaust, due to the dealers claim and terrible test methods of attempting to use the dipstick to measure short term oil loss, when the car was burning oil excessively over a longer term. Of course a dealer is going to try and tell you that by modding the car in any way, you will exceed the design spec...its a generic assertion made, because they often do not want to be responsible for replacing the part or component and cost. In the scenario above, you had to be burning more than a quart of oil in a short period of time (three days) for it to "be a problem", which is simply not true, pointed out after the fact that the car required a legit test, to the tune of testing the valve seals/guides, or compression on the rings etc. Another dealer tried to claim that wheel/tire upgrades and suspension modification on an RSX-S, were linked to the manaul tranny's synchros being faulty, partly do to "racing"...the tranny was indeed replaced under warranty, as conjecture does not outwiegh valid evidence. Therefore, claiming to "exceed design spec", can be a very weak claim, depedent on what it is exactly you have modified, and your knowledge of how a given mod has bearing on other parts of the car. I also did state specifically, "However, it can be a tedious battle, and some mods are easier to argue than others when it comes to failure. I can attest to other cases involving Mazda, Honda and Nissan vehicles, all popular among the modding community, where modifications done were said to void warranty, but indeed could not. Other times, they were proven to void the warranty, as what may have happened in your case. In either scenerio, if you're not properly able to defend what you did to your car, then don't perform the modification, otherwise be prepared for the dealer to take the hard line, and not honor warranty claims.
Old 06-24-06, 09:57 AM
  #21  
james6290
Lead Lap
 
james6290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

its a lifestyle, and a hobby, plain as that for me....
Old 06-24-06, 02:35 PM
  #22  
Bichon
Super Moderator
 
Bichon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,287
Received 267 Likes on 237 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shinobi-X
Under the Magnuson-Moss Act, a dealer must prove, not just vocalize, that aftermarket equipment caused the need for repairs before it can deny warranty coverage. If the dealer cannot prove such a claim — or it provides a questionable explanation — it is your legal right to demand compliance with the warranty.
Here is Magnuson-Moss:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht..._15_10_50.html

Please show me where it says that.
Old 06-24-06, 02:59 PM
  #23  
Bichon
Super Moderator
 
Bichon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,287
Received 267 Likes on 237 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shinobi-X
[Other times, they were proven to void the warranty, as what may have happened in your case.
Actually, I was lucky enough to still have the original turbos in my S4 working fine when I sold the car, despite some 60 ,000+ miles driving with a chip that increased the boost pressure and upped engine output by 60 HP.

During that time period, I had no problem obtaining warranty service to replace damaged speakers, a leaky gasket around the fuel gauge sender, and a few other parts unrelated to the chip. Had those claims been denied, I'd have certainly pursued legal remedies. But had my turbos blown, I would have sucked up the cost of the repair.

I know of others who HAVE had such problems. From what I've read, if you have a mod-friendly dealer willing to go-to-bat for you with the manufacturer's regional rep, you'll do much better than taking the case to court. They have lawyers and engineers on staff, you don't.

Last edited by Bichon; 06-24-06 at 03:04 PM.
Old 06-24-06, 08:25 PM
  #24  
cdeeznuts
Pole Position
iTrader: (2)
 
cdeeznuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: ca
Posts: 246
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

This is my IS.
There are many like it, but this one is mine.
My IS is my best friend.
It is my life.
I must master it as I must master my life.
My IS, without me, is useless.
Without my IS, I am useless.

My IS is human, even as I, because it is my life.
Thus, I will learn it as a brother.
I will learn its weaknesses,
its strengths,
its parts,
its accessories,
I will ever guard it against
the ravages of weather and damage.
I will keep my IS clean and ready,
even as I am clean and ready.
We will become part of each other.
We will.
Old 06-25-06, 12:36 AM
  #25  
OneOfOne
Lead Lap
 
OneOfOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

its not the modding but the lack of taste in some cases. modding is fine and as there are no limits to what can be done, also there is no accounting for what is done. its entirely up to the individual. you will never convince a tacky person that their tacky mods arent tacky. but as long as they are happy and you dont have to deal with it all is fine. the true modders do something that cant be easily repeated and which is novel, innovative, and not easily thought of. most of the rest is just hacking and silly.
Old 06-25-06, 04:35 AM
  #26  
goober007
Rookie
 
goober007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: BC
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the alternator on my 2000 accord coupe v6 blew after 20000 clicks... the dealership blamed the problem on the amp and subwoofer that i installed on the car... but they still replaced the alternator free of charge. lucky me i gues...
Old 06-25-06, 08:24 AM
  #27  
Lets Drive
Racer
iTrader: (3)
 
Lets Drive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 1,345
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bichon
Here is Magnuson-Moss:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht..._15_10_50.html

Please show me where it says that.
Above was the translation, below is the technical portion which you've asked for, and many more have utilized.

No warrantor of a consumer product may condition his written or implied warranty of such product on the consumers using, in connection with such product, any article or service (other than article or service provided without charge under the terms of the warranty) which is identified by brand, trade or corporate name; except that the prohibition of this subsection may be waived by the Commission if—

(1) the warrantor satisfies the Commission that the warranted product will function properly only if the article or service so identified is used in connection with the warranted product, and
(2) the Commission finds that such a waiver is in the public interest. (15 U.S.C. 2302(C)).


Mod at your own discretion.
Old 06-25-06, 10:43 AM
  #28  
kensteele
Lexus Champion
 
kensteele's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 2,726
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Shinobi-X
Above was the translation, below is the technical portion which you've asked for, and many more have utilized.

No warrantor of a consumer product may condition his written or implied warranty of such product on the consumers using, in connection with such product, any article or service (other than article or service provided without charge under the terms of the warranty) which is identified by brand, trade or corporate name; except that the prohibition of this subsection may be waived by the Commission if—

(1) the warrantor satisfies the Commission that the warranted product will function properly only if the article or service so identified is used in connection with the warranted product, and
(2) the Commission finds that such a waiver is in the public interest. (15 U.S.C. 2302(C)).


Mod at your own discretion.
That's not what that means. You should go back to "law" school lol.
Old 06-25-06, 11:59 AM
  #29  
Lets Drive
Racer
iTrader: (3)
 
Lets Drive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 1,345
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kensteele
That's not what that means. You should go back to "law" school lol.
Tell it to those who have had their warranties honored, for modifications which did not cause the damage to a given part, as previously claimed by a dealer. Otherwise, could you provide explanation for what the above "does mean", and why both aftermarket and dealers alike have honored it for what was stated/quoted previously in the debate.
Old 06-25-06, 12:03 PM
  #30  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by Griffey222
I am curious as to why so many people want to take such a FANTASTIC looking car and alter it with so many modifications...Sure, it's mostly wheels, drops, tints and kits, but I just don't see the appeal of taking such a FINE piece of machinery and altering it...I know, to each his/her own, but I just don't really get the whole mod sceen. And why is it that it seems the IS is so mod friendly, yet the BMW 3 is not...I also find it weird that the attraction to this car is so great from a mod standpoint, yet Lexus corporate keeps such a conservative approach...Of course this 2IS is much more agressive than any previous Lexus short of the original SC maybe? Anyway, just curious to see what everyone thinks!
Think of it this way.
Stock 911 is fantastic, almost perfect. But you can never be happy. Thus
C4S
AWD
GT2
GT3
Turbo
GT3 RS

etc etc(though those mods are 99% functional)

Mods in other words, accent your style and personality. If you want some more class, some nice 19" wheels and a drop. You have sublte body kits or the "hey look at me" ones. Bling, 20" chrome. You have the moron look, lambo doors.
Since cars were first built, man has modded them, trying to make them better or "fit" the owner.

HAPPY MODDING!!!


Quick Reply: Why so many Mods?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:45 AM.