IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013) Discussion about the 2006+ model IS models

Deciding Btw Audi A4 2.0, IS250 and Acura TSX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-06, 09:29 AM
  #61  
SLEXC400
Rookie
 
SLEXC400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Red face

Originally Posted by Bichon
My sister had that problem on her A4 too.

I had a similar problem with the small LCD trip computer display between the tach and speedo on my S4. Different rows of dots would dim and disappear, seemed somewhat temperature related. Never had that one fixed.

I also had to replace the throttle body hose on my S4 multiple times due to tears. It's a known weakness on the S4 turbo, and several aftermarket companies sell re-engineered replacements that are designed to last.

My sister also had the ABS controller on her A4 go, as well as some issue with the air injection (emission control device) that made the car sound like a jet for the first couple minutes after it was started.

Neither of us was ever stranded by the car. But both of us got tired of saying "we'll just do this $1200 repair and it should go another year", only to face another expensive repair a month or two down the road.

The maintenance issues on these cars are a real shame because they really are nice cars. Sure hope they can turn it around soon!!!
Old 10-11-06, 09:35 AM
  #62  
mvallido
Pole Position
 
mvallido's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Have her test drive all of them and have her decide. Women have different perspective when it comes to their rides.
Old 10-11-06, 02:37 PM
  #63  
socalJD
Lexus Champion
 
socalJD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SLEXC400
The maintenance issues on these cars are a real shame because they really are nice cars. Sure hope they can turn it around soon!!!
Why - what makes you think that german car makers *want* to build bullet proof cars ? IMHO Bmw, MB & Audi want their loyal customer base to flip cars every 4 yrs or 50k miles - if reliability was the goal, they'd extend their warranty to 6yr/70k like Lexus & Acura did on their powertrains. Look at GM, they went to 7yr/100k on all their new '07s - that's a bold move to dispel the reliability perceptions . . .
Old 10-11-06, 03:07 PM
  #64  
Threxx
Lexus Champion
 
Threxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,474
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by socalJD
Why - what makes you think that german car makers *want* to build bullet proof cars ? IMHO Bmw, MB & Audi want their loyal customer base to flip cars every 4 yrs or 50k miles - if reliability was the goal, they'd extend their warranty to 6yr/70k like Lexus & Acura did on their powertrains. Look at GM, they went to 7yr/100k on all their new '07s - that's a bold move to dispel the reliability perceptions . . .
GM went to 5 year, 100k miles... powertrain only. B2B is still stuck at a pathetic 3yr 36k miles. They went for maximum marketing impact with minimal cost increase because most people will hit 5 years long before they hit 100k miles, and those that do hit 100k miles will be doing a lot of highway driving anyway which is less likely to produce issues as it's much easier on the powertrain for the most part.

All car makers should want to shoot for great reliability because cars with poor reliability develop bad reps as used vehicles and thus their depreciation sucks - guess what that means? Anyone with half a brain is going to realize that even if they sell their unreliable lux car before the warranty goes out, it's going to depreciate much more than a reliable car would, and in the end, the real cost of ownership is depreciation, not purchase price.

This also affects lease rates in the same negative way.
Old 10-11-06, 03:54 PM
  #65  
iStyle
Driver
 
iStyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anyone claiming that the IS250 doesn't perform likely hasn't driven it. The IS350 is more fun in a straight line. Period.

In terms of handling, the 250's more-balanced weight distribution and lighter curb weight give it an edge over the 350.

Originally Posted by C&D
Straight-line performance aside, the IS250 is a pleasure to drive, even more than its big brother. The IS350 weighs 135 more pounds than the 3465-pound IS250, and with extra weight carried over its handsome nose, the 350 understeers more than we’d like. Also, the more powerful car’s suspension feels a bit overdamped and overzealous, whereas the 250’s feels composed and tight. There’s predictable understeer on corner entry, but a midcorner squeeze on the throttle is enough to tighten your line for a precise and pleasant blast to the next corner. For better balance, we’d take the IS250 over the IS350.
In terms of acceleration, the IS250 reaches 60 quicker than the fastest IS300 Car & Driver ever tested.

In terms of braking (70–0 mph), the IS250 takes just 3 more feet to reach a full stop.

The IS250 hate is getting old fast. Speed isn't the only factor in regards to performance.
Old 10-11-06, 03:57 PM
  #66  
txstud86
Driver School Candidate
 
txstud86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, If Lexus vehicles are so reliable across the board, as you all claim, why has my father's 2006 GS430 had transmission issues? I've read similar complaints on the ES350 forum, and also a few issues with the structural integrity of the ES350.

The point is that Toyota/Lexus isn't immune from these so-called reliability issues either, and we're talking new cars.

And in reading these responses, I think some of the problems these posters are claiming with A4's are either entirely fabricated or exaggerated. Furthermore, I'm sure the OP was considering new or almost new cars, so none of these issues would arise until according to you "after 100,000 miles".

What's really interesting is that in Europe, and specifically Germany Audi is perceived as being of higher quality than BMW or MB. Toyota isn't perceived by consumers as reliable as VW. Very interesting to observe the drastic perceptual differences.

Most Lexus drivers here, and all of the A4 owners who responded to this thread, lease their cars so all of these so-called reliability issues that show up after 100,000k miles are moot. Certainly won't stop me from buying another Audi.
Old 10-11-06, 05:24 PM
  #67  
SugarRush
Pit Crew
 
SugarRush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 243
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by txstud86
Well, If Lexus vehicles are so reliable across the board, as you all claim, why has my father's 2006 GS430 had transmission issues? I've read similar complaints on the ES350 forum, and also a few issues with the structural integrity of the ES350.
^ I agree with you. No one car brand is perfect.
My earlier post sharing the story of my problematic Audi A4 was from my personal experience owning the vehicle.

Originally Posted by txstud86
And in reading these responses, I think some of the problems these posters are claiming with A4's are either entirely fabricated or exaggerated.
^I neither fabricated nor exagerated. I described the problem just as they were. I am still an Audi anthusiast, I think their Quatro and interior quality is very good. I was also very active in Audiworld.com and Audi comunity in general when i owned the A4. However, I will not own another Audi until their quality gets better. How do i know when? When consumer reports says so.

Originally Posted by txstud86
Furthermore, I'm sure the OP was considering new or almost new cars, so none of these issues would arise until according to you "after 100,000 miles".
^ True. A colleague of mine owns the Audi A3. Beautiful hatchback!
It's almost 2 yrs old now and she has no major problem with it.
As long as it is under warranty, it is ok .

Originally Posted by txstud86
What's really interesting is that in Europe, and specifically Germany Audi is perceived as being of higher quality than BMW or MB. Toyota isn't perceived by consumers as reliable as VW. Very interesting to observe the drastic perceptual differences.
^ You are partially right.
I have relatives who lived in Germany (near Munich). They are all born and raise in Germany.
This is what they told me of what German public perceive on cars quality:
- Toyota and Honda are famous for reliability in germany, but they are boring cars.
- Audi/VW in germany are reliable cars. Their resale value are OK.
- Porsche and Benz are a bit less reliable cars but have good resale value.
- BMW are reliable, sporty and have good resale. But most would rather get a benz or porsche.
In general, it seems that Audi/VW vehicles in Germany are reliable indeed, relative to the Audi/VWs in US.

Originally Posted by txstud86
....Certainly won't stop me from buying another Audi.
^Everyone is entitled to what they want to do with his/her money .

Last edited by SugarRush; 10-11-06 at 05:32 PM.
Old 10-11-06, 05:33 PM
  #68  
Bichon
Super Moderator
 
Bichon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,287
Received 268 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by txstud86
And in reading these responses, I think some of the problems these posters are claiming with A4's are either entirely fabricated or exaggerated. Furthermore, I'm sure the OP was considering new or almost new cars, so none of these issues would arise until according to you "after 100,000 miles".
Unfortunately, they aren't fabricated or exaggerated a bit. I have the receipts to prove it.

Toyota isn't perceived by consumers as reliable as VW. Very interesting to observe the drastic perceptual differences.
You did a survey? All of the actual surveys I've seen e.g., the one that Consumer Reports does every year, shows Toyota/Lexus light years ahead of Audi in terms of reliability. And while the CR survey is American not European, it measures actual problems, not perceptions (which may be heavily biased).

Most Lexus drivers here, and all of the A4 owners who responded to this thread, lease their cars so all of these so-called reliability issues that show up after 100,000k miles are moot. Certainly won't stop me from buying another Audi.
My sister and I bought our cars, we didn't lease them. The reliability issues started creeping up at around 60,000 miles. Both of us sold at around 90,000 due to excessive maintenance and repair costs.

I invite you to go to Audiworld and ask in the B5 A4, B5 S4, C5 A6, or any other forums where owners of older Audis hang out and ask them how the reliability and maintenance costs of their Audi compares with similar aged Japanese vehicles they've owned. I'd bet you a beer that even among those Audi lovers, they'd hand that crown to the Japanese marques.

Look, if you are leasing a car, and plan to return it before the warranty expires, the issue is moot. But many buy a car to drive for a longer duration, especially if they enjoy driving it as much as I enjoyed my S4. Which leads me to the statement I made in my first post in this thread: I may own another Audi, but I won't own another Audi that isn't under warranty.
Old 10-11-06, 06:29 PM
  #69  
ayu910
Driver School Candidate
 
ayu910's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My sister and I bought our cars, we didn't lease them. The reliability issues started creeping up at around 60,000 miles. Both of us sold at around 90,000 due to excessive maintenance and repair costs.

I invite you to go to Audiworld and ask in the B5 A4, B5 S4, C5 A6, or any other forums where owners of older Audis hang out and ask them how the reliability and maintenance costs of their Audi compares with similar aged Japanese vehicles they've owned. I'd bet you a beer that even among those Audi lovers, they'd hand that crown to the Japanese marques.

Look, if you are leasing a car, and plan to return it before the warranty expires, the issue is moot. But many buy a car to drive for a longer duration, especially if they enjoy driving it as much as I enjoyed my S4. Which leads me to the statement I made in my first post in this thread: I may own another Audi, but I won't own another Audi that isn't under warranty.
same here, used to have Allroad and all the problems pop up around 50~60K. I got all the receipts to prove it too (susp, power seat, oil leak, etc) and I finally sold it around 65K miles. Regardless, I still think Audi is a fun to dirve car with great interior and I don't mind lease a new one in the future. Of course, will dump the car back to Audi right after my lease end...no way I will keep any Audi for 50K+.

Last edited by ayu910; 10-11-06 at 06:55 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
roughyear
IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present)
11
06-22-15 08:40 AM
dmenace
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
16
12-18-10 11:33 AM
lk9865
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
4
08-27-07 08:20 AM
Cabby
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
26
05-02-06 07:14 AM
berg7445
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
4
11-17-05 06:53 PM



Quick Reply: Deciding Btw Audi A4 2.0, IS250 and Acura TSX



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:21 AM.