View Poll Results: Do you like the new IS-F?
Voters: 264. You may not vote on this poll
POLL: IS-F: Yay or Nay
#31
You know thats BS! I Was soo excited for this car..hoping that maybe, JUST maybe toyota would understand that a beast with a 400+ hp V8 needs a manual to truely feel like a "sports sedan". The only reason he said lexus isnt trying to compete with other sports sedans is because Lexus is stupid and cant admit that they are behind in something, and because lexus is about " the "pursuit of perfection", not performance. ( Why the IS-F then?)
There are many people out there that WANT an auto tranny, and in fact, most drivers with the money will want the prestige and simplicity of an auto tranny over a manual tranny.
It is BS, but guess what, the IS will sell like hotcakes!
We all want a manual for sports performance, but unless if it's a Ferrari or Lambo or such, most "sports cars" out there are first and foremost for prestige and power, not performance and handling. Just look at M.B's AMG Division: lots of HP, no manual tranny!
Are they behind on performance? Yes. Is Lexus really trying to be #1 on performance? I don't think so. Would a manual tranny then be necessary? Definately not. It would be nice, but business for business, it isn't necessary...
#32
Read more: (It is a DSG-like tranny with 8 gears!)
http://pressroom.toyota.com/Releases...T2007010840613
http://pressroom.toyota.com/Releases...T2007010840613
#33
Offer the automatic transmission for those that want it for prestige, convenience, or whatever, and offer a manual transmission for those that believe (and that includes many auto reviewers and magazines) that a true sports sedan should be available with stick. Heck, I wouldn't even mind if the manual cost a bit more than the auto.
#34
Offer the automatic transmission for those that want it for prestige, convenience, or whatever, and offer a manual transmission for those that believe (and that includes many auto reviewers and magazines) that a true sports sedan should be available with stick. Heck, I wouldn't even mind if the manual cost a bit more than the auto.
#35
What point is he missing? They aren't mutually exclusive!
Offer the automatic transmission for those that want it for prestige, convenience, or whatever, and offer a manual transmission for those that believe (and that includes many auto reviewers and magazines) that a true sports sedan should be available with stick. Heck, I wouldn't even mind if the manual cost a bit more than the auto.
Offer the automatic transmission for those that want it for prestige, convenience, or whatever, and offer a manual transmission for those that believe (and that includes many auto reviewers and magazines) that a true sports sedan should be available with stick. Heck, I wouldn't even mind if the manual cost a bit more than the auto.
#36
What point is he missing? They aren't mutually exclusive!
Offer the automatic transmission for those that want it for prestige, convenience, or whatever, and offer a manual transmission for those that believe (and that includes many auto reviewers and magazines) that a true sports sedan should be available with stick. Heck, I wouldn't even mind if the manual cost a bit more than the auto.
Offer the automatic transmission for those that want it for prestige, convenience, or whatever, and offer a manual transmission for those that believe (and that includes many auto reviewers and magazines) that a true sports sedan should be available with stick. Heck, I wouldn't even mind if the manual cost a bit more than the auto.
#37
I think you're missing the point.
There are many people out there that WANT an auto tranny, and in fact, most drivers with the money will want the prestige and simplicity of an auto tranny over a manual tranny.
It is BS, but guess what, the IS will sell like hotcakes!
We all want a manual for sports performance, but unless if it's a Ferrari or Lambo or such, most "sports cars" out there are first and foremost for prestige and power, not performance and handling. Just look at M.B's AMG Division: lots of HP, no manual tranny!
Are they behind on performance? Yes. Is Lexus really trying to be #1 on performance? I don't think so. Would a manual tranny then be necessary? Definately not. It would be nice, but business for business, it isn't necessary...
There are many people out there that WANT an auto tranny, and in fact, most drivers with the money will want the prestige and simplicity of an auto tranny over a manual tranny.
It is BS, but guess what, the IS will sell like hotcakes!
We all want a manual for sports performance, but unless if it's a Ferrari or Lambo or such, most "sports cars" out there are first and foremost for prestige and power, not performance and handling. Just look at M.B's AMG Division: lots of HP, no manual tranny!
Are they behind on performance? Yes. Is Lexus really trying to be #1 on performance? I don't think so. Would a manual tranny then be necessary? Definately not. It would be nice, but business for business, it isn't necessary...
#39
A valid market, perhaps, but not quite what I'm looking for.
I think the market is clearly for the riced cars who have graduated past the Preludes, Integras, and Civics. I don't see middle America opting for this car, but rather young kids who's parents want them to drive a Lexus. With the backseat so small, the car should have been a coupe from the start.
Last edited by Bichon; 01-08-07 at 04:21 PM.
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
AS for this manual stuff. Hey I love a manual. MY ES 300 IS A MANUAL
Guess what, people don't buy em.
Guess what, 70% of Ms sold, are SMG
Guess what, 75% of Vettes, are automatics
Guess what, the Lamborghini Gallardo has a regualar 6 speed auto.
Guess what, the 997 911 Turbo is FASTER as an automatic
Ferrari has E-gear now, and guess what, people are saying to hell with the shift gate. The Aston Martin reviews, all PREFER the auto to the manual.
It is RACING tech. Those paddle shifters are from F-1. That is why Ferrari has em and so is everyone else doing it.
So yes, a manual would have been great but the competiton has moved on to autos and dsg etc etc.
Guess what, people don't buy em.
Guess what, 70% of Ms sold, are SMG
Guess what, 75% of Vettes, are automatics
Guess what, the Lamborghini Gallardo has a regualar 6 speed auto.
Guess what, the 997 911 Turbo is FASTER as an automatic
Ferrari has E-gear now, and guess what, people are saying to hell with the shift gate. The Aston Martin reviews, all PREFER the auto to the manual.
It is RACING tech. Those paddle shifters are from F-1. That is why Ferrari has em and so is everyone else doing it.
So yes, a manual would have been great but the competiton has moved on to autos and dsg etc etc.
#42
complete and utter disaster. I really hoped they would get this one right but this car will go down in the annals of automotive history as yet another Japanese offering that totally missed the target by ignoring the whims of the customers they're trying to lure away from European manufacturers. As long as they keep doing this, they will continue to be an afterthought when it comes to the M3s and S4/RS4s of the world.
Words can't describe how disappointed I am in the ridiculous treatment given to the exterior...and the continued use of the cheap *** clock that belongs in a Corolla...and no manual...and...
Words can't describe how disappointed I am in the ridiculous treatment given to the exterior...and the continued use of the cheap *** clock that belongs in a Corolla...and no manual...and...
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
complete and utter disaster. I really hoped they would get this one right but this car will go down in the annals of automotive history as yet another Japanese offering that totally missed the target by ignoring the whims of the customers they're trying to lure away from European manufacturers. As long as they keep doing this, they will continue to be an afterthought when it comes to the M3s and S4/RS4s of the world.
Words can't describe how disappointed I am in the ridiculous treatment given to the exterior...and the continued use of the cheap *** clock that belongs in a Corolla...and no manual...and...
Words can't describe how disappointed I am in the ridiculous treatment given to the exterior...and the continued use of the cheap *** clock that belongs in a Corolla...and no manual...and...
#44
I think the IS-F is a step in the right direction. I personally don't think it is on par with the M3, but BMW has been doing it for decades and Lexus is only starting. Today, I would still gladly buy an M3 over the IS-F given the price is about the same. In the future though I think Lexus can catch up and match the M cars. Now, If Lexus is chasing the AMG cars I can understand the direction. We all know M cars and AMG cars are very different. I perfer the BMW M way myself, that is why the IS-F too me is not there yet. I'm just glad Lexus is attempting to compete though. It gives me a reason to look forward to what Lexus will come out with in the future that caters to the few of us sports car fans.
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
I think the IS-F is a step in the right direction. I personally don't think it is on par with the M3, but BMW has been doing it for decades and Lexus is only starting. Today, I would still gladly buy an M3 over the IS-F given the price is about the same. In the future though I think Lexus can catch up and match the M cars. Now, If Lexus is chasing the AMG cars I can understand the direction. We all know M cars and AMG cars are very different. I perfer the BMW M way myself, that is why the IS-F too me is not there yet. I'm just glad Lexus is attempting to compete though. It gives me a reason to look forward to what Lexus will come out with in the future that caters to the few of us sports car fans.