IS350 slower than these cheaper cars?
02-06-07, 08:04 PM
#1
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IS350 slower than these cheaper cars?
02-06-07, 09:06 PM
#7
Pole Position
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: orange county, ca
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
a car is not defined by its 0-60...
Trending Topics
02-06-07, 09:25 PM
#10
wow the only car on that list that i would rock is the evo, anything else is
the one thing that i went with the is is the interior like other said, its way nicer then any other cars that i test drove.
the one thing that i went with the is is the interior like other said, its way nicer then any other cars that i test drove.
02-06-07, 09:30 PM
#11
Super Moderator
That "Road Test Summary" in the back of that issue you mentioned, the one that shows the EVO at 5.1, still lists the IS350 at 6.0.
02-06-07, 11:13 PM
#12
Driver
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, that's the latest Road and Track. In their previous test of the IS350, they measured six seconds flat. Both numbers are aberrations, nearly all other magazines time it in the 5.1 - 5.3 range.
That "Road Test Summary" in the back of that issue you mentioned, the one that shows the EVO at 5.1, still lists the IS350 at 6.0.
That "Road Test Summary" in the back of that issue you mentioned, the one that shows the EVO at 5.1, still lists the IS350 at 6.0.
02-06-07, 11:34 PM
#14
Driver
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HI
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Plus, I think most of us bought the IS not just because it was the fastest.
