IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013) Discussion about the 2006+ model IS models

I don't understand some 2IS buyers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-07, 10:03 AM
  #31  
neova
Pole Position
 
neova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
From day 1, other than the 350 having more power than the 3 series (which advantage is now gone with the 335), the BMW was the hands-down winner when it came to handling. If you are shopping for a sports sedan, I would have thought that you would read up on these kind of reviews, and know ahead of time you were not getting the handling of a 3 series.
The ES350 is a luxury sedan, the IS250/350 is a sports sedan. So i was looking for a sport sedan. Like i said, other factors (money mostly) helped me decide that IS250 was the right choice for me given the circumstances at the time. I knew the compromise I had to make with this choice.

But the main point is, Lexus aspires to challenge BMW to make a better sport sedan than the 3-series, and while they've done well, it fell short in the handling department.
Old 10-03-07, 10:36 AM
  #32  
jdanon
Lead Lap
 
jdanon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm sure there's also some brand loyalty among consumers. I think you could tell people that the BMW blows up if it hits 70 mph and people would still buy them just to have that little blue and white circle emblem on the back of their cars. As far as quality of car goes, Lexus wins hands down, that is not even debatable, but is having that bit of performance or handling edge in the BMW worth it at the cost of a lower quality car? I've tried posing this question to the young BMW crowd here at work, and they have no real good answer as to what's so spectacular about a BMW over any other car.

I suspect a lot of it has to do with the image or status that comes with having a BMW. Living and driving every day in an urban environment renders speed, handling, or any other performance related metrics you can think of useless when your top speed is going to be 60 mph if you're lucky enough not to be sitting in traffic doing the stop and go thing on the highway. If you're not on a highway you're driving on straight roads with traffic lights every 300-500 feet and lots of pedestrian traffic. I guess I just don't know where some of you guys are driving your cars where some of the stuff people are nitpicking over is exposed. Call me crazy, but if I was going to nitpick, it would be over interior features which is the part I see and use the most.
Old 10-03-07, 10:46 AM
  #33  
Yay-Z
Lead Lap
 
Yay-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jdanon
I'm sure there's also some brand loyalty among consumers. I think you could tell people that the BMW blows up if it hits 70 mph and people would still buy them just to have that little blue and white circle emblem on the back of their cars. As far as quality of car goes, Lexus wins hands down, that is not even debatable, but is having that bit of performance or handling edge in the BMW worth it at the cost of a lower quality car? I've tried posing this question to the young BMW crowd here at work, and they have no real good answer as to what's so spectacular about a BMW over any other car.

I suspect a lot of it has to do with the image or status that comes with having a BMW. Living and driving every day in an urban environment renders speed, handling, or any other performance related metrics you can think of useless when your top speed is going to be 60 mph if you're lucky enough not to be sitting in traffic doing the stop and go thing on the highway. If you're not on a highway you're driving on straight roads with traffic lights every 300-500 feet and lots of pedestrian traffic. I guess I just don't know where some of you guys are driving your cars where some of the stuff people are nitpicking over is exposed. Call me crazy, but if I was going to nitpick, it would be over interior features which is the part I see and use the most.
cosign, Exterior draws me in, but it is the interior that keeps me.

The lexus interior is what sold me finally. I have an IS250, so its pretty obvious Im not big on performance. I would have also taken the 328i, but I just couldnt warm up to that interior.

Old 10-03-07, 10:47 AM
  #34  
t.is350.h
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (3)
 
t.is350.h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SoCal 818
Posts: 1,497
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neova
because that's what the IS is suppose to challenge - BMW. It has done everything well, except for driver input / steering feel. I've driven many different cars and still the BMW is the best in that respect.

Of course, there are other factors when buying a car, and eventually I decided on the 2IS. That doesn't mean we can't complain/point out its short comings.
I don't know y you choose this car at the first place and complaint after that...you have the right to complaint, but complaint to yourself...no body making you to buy anything....
Old 10-03-07, 11:23 AM
  #35  
Swisha
Pole Position
 
Swisha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Jose to OC
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm a bmw fan and forever will be, but one thing it lacks is interior design which haven't changed much since the early 90's. But like on every forum you see people switching from bmw to japanese and visa versa. Cause a single car manuf. can't please everybody so some trade offs are expected.
Old 10-03-07, 11:26 AM
  #36  
llamaboiz
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
llamaboiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Windward, Oahu
Posts: 11,030
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

HAHA yep i knew the BMW comparo would come up. Well then let me say this, NO it doesnt handle as well as a BMW, BUT it handles a hella lot better than most of the other cars on the road. Handles better than moms neon, dads caravan and my modded 89 5.0 mustang.

Heres something too, if you run a touge with a BMW in front and a IS in the back, by the end of the run would the BMW have pulled away so much as to consider it a 'win'? I dont think so...
Old 10-03-07, 11:33 AM
  #37  
jdanon
Lead Lap
 
jdanon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What does one mean by handling? If this is going to be some huge metric for comparing a BMW to a Lexus, there better be a definition for it that's quantifiable. Otherwise this is like arguing that the BMW has a shinier black paint than the Lexus -- it's purely a subjective thing with no definitive way to measure it. I wish people would speak in concrete terms and from personal experience instead of quoting some magazine article.
Old 10-03-07, 11:40 AM
  #38  
combfilter
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
combfilter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PNice972
becuase we like the styling and reliablity of a japanese car
+1..............................
Old 10-03-07, 11:40 AM
  #39  
FiveOhNine
Lexus Champion
 
FiveOhNine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dark side of the moon
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jdanon
As far as quality of car goes, Lexus wins hands down, that is not even debatable, but is having that bit of performance or handling edge in the BMW worth it at the cost of a lower quality car?
I think it's debatable. My BMW was better engineered than my Lexus; they used higher quality parts and put the entire package together better than my Lexus. The BMW was rock solid from day one where my Lexus often reminds me that it's a Toyota by a little groan here or a squeak there.

I honestly believe that my BMW was better engineered than my Lexus. Where I think the BMW was lacking was in the quality control on the assembly line. This is what make Japanese cars so reliable; they start with a good (not great) model, and build the exact same thing over and over and over again, with minimal faults.

The Germans (with a few exceptions) start with a great model and build 25% of them with minimal faults. It's the other 75% that kills me.
Old 10-03-07, 11:45 AM
  #40  
Joeb427
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joeb427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 11,670
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

A buddy of mine who owns a bodyshop told me he feels German cars are built the best body and hardware wise.
Old 10-03-07, 12:02 PM
  #41  
Bichon
Super Moderator
 
Bichon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,287
Received 268 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IS_Mine
No its not bad at all but if you bought a Lexus and researched the brand you (not you in general) would know that Lexus is about luxory first -- over everything.
While luxury has always been Lexus' core competency, the 2IS was promoted by both Lexus and the media as a new direction for Lexus: a sedan designed with the BMW 3 series in the cross-hairs, to attract a new demographic looking for a healthy dose of "sport" with their luxury. In fact it was the second place finish in the 35k sport sedan comparison in Car and Driver that got me to visit the Lexus showroom shortly after the IS350 was released.

Originally Posted by FiveOhNine
I don't really agree with the 'dont mess with success' mantra. It didn't work for detroit, and it won't work forever with Lexus either. The good new is, they don't believe it either as evidenced by some of the concepts and new models they are coming out with.
"Don't mess with success" is definitely not the Toyota mantra. It's a company that relentlessly researches customer needs now and in the future, and endeavors to build the right vehicles to meet them. They don't always nail it on the first try, or even the second, but they eventually hit the nail squarely on the head, and that's why they've passed GM to become the number one automaker in revenue. Witness their attempts to crack the last bastion of Detroit supremacy: full size trucks. They've done the same thing with Lexus, refining their product mix through market research, growing the venture to be the top-selling luxury brand. I have no doubt that if Toyota's market research was to indicate that the best way to grow their market share in luxury cars is to build a better handling car than BMW, they'll muster the engineering resources needed to do it.
Old 10-03-07, 12:08 PM
  #42  
FiveOhNine
Lexus Champion
 
FiveOhNine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dark side of the moon
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bichon
"Don't mess with success" is definitely not the Toyota mantra. It's a company that relentlessly researches customer needs now and in the future, and endeavors to build the right vehicles to meet them. They don't always nail it on the first try, or even the second, but they eventually hit the nail squarely on the head, and that's why they've passed GM to become the number one automaker in revenue. Witness their attempts to crack the last bastion of Detroit supremacy: full size trucks. They've done the same thing with Lexus, refining their product mix through market research, growing the venture to be the top-selling luxury brand. I have no doubt that if Toyota's market research was to indicate that the best way to grow their market share in luxury cars is to build a better handling car than BMW, they'll muster the engineering resources needed to do it.
I think we are saying the same thing. I was responding to this:

Originally Posted by jdanon
If I were Lexus I wouldn't change their successful formula just to make a handful of people that want a BMW without actually having a BMW happy.
Old 10-03-07, 12:24 PM
  #43  
Bichon
Super Moderator
 
Bichon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,287
Received 268 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FiveOhNine
I think we are saying the same thing. I was responding to this:
I know, I wasn't contradicting you, I was elaborating on your point.
Old 10-03-07, 01:01 PM
  #44  
FiveOhNine
Lexus Champion
 
FiveOhNine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dark side of the moon
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bichon
I know, I wasn't contradicting you, I was elaborating on your point.
Well, then high-five
Old 10-03-07, 02:05 PM
  #45  
weesped
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (8)
 
weesped's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

I compleaty agree I mean when u buy the car u should be aware of what it can do and how it handles so why complane about it after? I mean it would have been pretty easy to do a google on the is handleing and then you would u have been about to see the is isn't a 3 series. Andyou should have got the car based off of the possive points and you would have weighed all the pros a cons vs the other cars in this class or car. Idk that's just my 2 cents because I came into this knowing I wouldn't get euro handleing but I would get tech goodness and comfert so I'm happy. Btw sorry for typos my iphone change stupid words

Last edited by weesped; 10-03-07 at 02:08 PM.


Quick Reply: I don't understand some 2IS buyers?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:28 PM.