I don't understand some 2IS buyers?
10-03-07 | 08:45 PM
#61
Lead Lap
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Boca Raton, FL
The 3 Series is NOT a sports car, even in M form. Now, the BMW 2 seater models would define a sports car. Oh yah, for those who don't know or think it is a typo, the correct term is sports car, not sport car. Yes, this gal knows a thing or two about cars. Remember "My Cousin Vinny"? LOL
Last edited by DropTopGal; 10-03-07 at 09:15 PM.
10-03-07 | 08:52 PM
#62
Lead Lap
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Boca Raton, FL
I think it's debatable. My BMW was better engineered than my Lexus; they used higher quality parts and put the entire package together better than my Lexus. The BMW was rock solid from day one where my Lexus often reminds me that it's a Toyota by a little groan here or a squeak there.
I honestly believe that my BMW was better engineered than my Lexus. Where I think the BMW was lacking was in the quality control on the assembly line. This is what make Japanese cars so reliable; they start with a good (not great) model, and build the exact same thing over and over and over again, with minimal faults.
The Germans (with a few exceptions) start with a great model and build 25% of them with minimal faults. It's the other 75% that kills me.
I honestly believe that my BMW was better engineered than my Lexus. Where I think the BMW was lacking was in the quality control on the assembly line. This is what make Japanese cars so reliable; they start with a good (not great) model, and build the exact same thing over and over and over again, with minimal faults.
The Germans (with a few exceptions) start with a great model and build 25% of them with minimal faults. It's the other 75% that kills me.
First, BMW is a decade or more behind Lexus when it comes to electronics. BMW notoriously has poor electronics and is actually one of the main problems with BMWs today. If you have not noticed, cars today are run by computers / electronics. They should hire Lexus engineers to do their electronics.
I'm basing off of personal experience with two E46s models in the not to distant past to use for comparison. I could go on and on, but to me, BMW is inferior in build quality, period. Oh, and the BMW tail lights have something in common with the interior design...> circa 1980s.
10-03-07 | 08:56 PM
#63
Lead Lap
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: ca
BMW better engineered than the Lexus? Oh, I completely disagree. Don't confuse the sound when the door closes with engineering. Engineering today includes many facets, materials, build quality, electronics... to name just a few.
First, BMW is a decade or more behind Lexus when it comes to electronics. BMW notoriously has poor electronics and is actually one of the main problems with BMWs today. If you have not noticed, cars today are run by computers / electronics. They should hire Lexus engineers to do their electronics.
I'm basing off of personal experience with two E46s models in the not to distant past to use for comparison. I could go on and on, but to me, BMW is inferior in build quality, period. Oh, and the BMW tail lights have something in common with the interior design...> circa 1980s.
First, BMW is a decade or more behind Lexus when it comes to electronics. BMW notoriously has poor electronics and is actually one of the main problems with BMWs today. If you have not noticed, cars today are run by computers / electronics. They should hire Lexus engineers to do their electronics.
I'm basing off of personal experience with two E46s models in the not to distant past to use for comparison. I could go on and on, but to me, BMW is inferior in build quality, period. Oh, and the BMW tail lights have something in common with the interior design...> circa 1980s.
10-03-07 | 09:48 PM
#65
I'm basing off of personal experience with two E46s models in the not to distant past to use for comparison. I could go on and on, but to me, BMW is inferior in build quality, period. Oh, and the BMW tail lights have something in common with the interior design...> circa 1980s.
.........seriously.Here's the thread: https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=309913
10-04-07 | 07:34 AM
#66
Lexus Champion
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dark side of the moon
BMW better engineered than the Lexus? Oh, I completely disagree. Don't confuse the sound when the door closes with engineering. Engineering today includes many facets, materials, build quality, electronics... to name just a few.
First, BMW is a decade or more behind Lexus when it comes to electronics. BMW notoriously has poor electronics and is actually one of the main problems with BMWs today. If you have not noticed, cars today are run by computers / electronics. They should hire Lexus engineers to do their electronics.
I'm basing off of personal experience with two E46s models in the not to distant past to use for comparison. I could go on and on, but to me, BMW is inferior in build quality, period. Oh, and the BMW tail lights have something in common with the interior design...> circa 1980s.
First, BMW is a decade or more behind Lexus when it comes to electronics. BMW notoriously has poor electronics and is actually one of the main problems with BMWs today. If you have not noticed, cars today are run by computers / electronics. They should hire Lexus engineers to do their electronics.
I'm basing off of personal experience with two E46s models in the not to distant past to use for comparison. I could go on and on, but to me, BMW is inferior in build quality, period. Oh, and the BMW tail lights have something in common with the interior design...> circa 1980s.
P.S. e46 might have been different, mine was an e90.
10-04-07 | 07:40 AM
#67
Lexus Champion
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dark side of the moon
Do a search and learn... A simple definition of a sports car is "a small low car with a high-powered engine, and generally seats two people". This is more or less a "textbook" definition but gives us an idea of what the public perceives to be a sports car. This does not include coupes or sedans. Many enthusiasts also consider that a sports car must be available in a convertible. Nearly all motor vehicle departments in the 50 states apply the above definition to catagorize a sports car.
The 3 Series is NOT a sports car, even in M form. Now, the BMW 2 seater models would define a sports car. Oh yah, for those who don't know or think it is a typo, the correct term is sports car, not sport car. Yes, this gal knows a thing or two about cars. Remember "My Cousin Vinny"? LOL
The 3 Series is NOT a sports car, even in M form. Now, the BMW 2 seater models would define a sports car. Oh yah, for those who don't know or think it is a typo, the correct term is sports car, not sport car. Yes, this gal knows a thing or two about cars. Remember "My Cousin Vinny"? LOL
10-04-07 | 08:18 AM
#68
Lead Lap
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Florida
10-04-07 | 08:19 AM
#69
Lead Lap
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: houston, TX
10-04-07 | 08:33 AM
#71
Lexus Champion
It's not all about speed and HP--if it was, for the $$, I'd have bought a Dodge Charger.
10-04-07 | 08:36 AM
#72
Lexus Champion
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dark side of the moon
10-04-07 | 08:47 AM
#73
Lead Lap
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: houston, TX
10-04-07 | 10:59 AM
#75
Lexus Champion
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: So Cal
Keep dreaming, maybe one day another Preston Tucker will happen along. Such a car will never exist, at any price . . .