IS 350 vs. Cadillac '08 CTS
04-08-08, 09:52 AM
#31
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: *661* CA
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a nissan 350Z. Don't get me wrong I love the car, but at times it's a b!%ch to deal with. I have had nothing but the best luck with honda and toyota brands.
04-08-08, 10:16 AM
#33
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: MIAMI
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We had a CTS-V in 05 and a regular CTS before that in 2003. The quality and reliability cannot compete with lexus. I never thought i'd not have a cadillac or range rover. The only CTS worth getting is the CTS-V, trule one of the most enjoyable cars we've ever had. The new CTS's are just that "new" it's a matter of time before the problems start popping up left and right, and how do you explain paying close to 40k for a car that doesn't have BLUETOOTH lol. The 3.6L DI CTS isn't bad, but IS350 is much more enjoyable. From personal experience, you're going to get horrible depreciation on your cadillac. Cadillac still hasn't perfected the rear wheel drive, the handling is very flaky unless you get the F2 or F3 suspension. The sunroof cover in the cadillacs is like a sheet of paper, very cheesy. The packages are really pricy, 7-8k for navigation package!!!. Whatever you choose, enjoy cause either way your dishing out a ton of money, just don't look back on your choice 
.
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
