Depreciation.....is it worth a 2nd vehicle?
#1
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Depreciation.....is it worth a 2nd vehicle?
I just found out I'll be driving nearly 30,000 miles next year (combination of business trips and personal use). The IS 350 is the only vehicle I have so I'm considering getting a second vehicle to drive for most of these trips (approximately 25,000 of those miles)
I did several calculations to determine if leasing a second vehicle (corolla) would actually save me money by reducing the fuel cost, maintenance cost (i do my own mainteneance so basically just the cost of parts and fluids), and by reducing the amount of vehicle depreciation on the IS.
I currently have 20k miles so I checked to see what the difference was on my trade in value for 25k vs 50k miles. Kelly blue book showed about $6250 difference! Edmunds.com showed only $1400.
So if I use edmunds' estimates, I don't loose very much in depreciation so it ends up being cheaper to keep using the IS for all 30K miles, by about $500 so pretty much a draw. If I use KBB's estimates, I end up saving $4300 a year by driving the Corolla instead.
Which source do you all think is more reliable for estimating the deprectiation of the 350? Any other thoughts appreciated.
I did several calculations to determine if leasing a second vehicle (corolla) would actually save me money by reducing the fuel cost, maintenance cost (i do my own mainteneance so basically just the cost of parts and fluids), and by reducing the amount of vehicle depreciation on the IS.
I currently have 20k miles so I checked to see what the difference was on my trade in value for 25k vs 50k miles. Kelly blue book showed about $6250 difference! Edmunds.com showed only $1400.
So if I use edmunds' estimates, I don't loose very much in depreciation so it ends up being cheaper to keep using the IS for all 30K miles, by about $500 so pretty much a draw. If I use KBB's estimates, I end up saving $4300 a year by driving the Corolla instead.
Which source do you all think is more reliable for estimating the deprectiation of the 350? Any other thoughts appreciated.
#2
Pole Position
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No matter what the depreciation difference may be selling a low milaege car is much easier than a high mileage car.
We have an 07' Corolla S as well and I have an average of 35.5 mpg from new. Currently at 18,000 miles. Hand calculated/ tracked every tank from 200 miles on the odo. High of 38mpg. On the highway only I would estimate between 42 to 44mpg. It's a decent ride but not the Lexus.
We have an 07' Corolla S as well and I have an average of 35.5 mpg from new. Currently at 18,000 miles. Hand calculated/ tracked every tank from 200 miles on the odo. High of 38mpg. On the highway only I would estimate between 42 to 44mpg. It's a decent ride but not the Lexus.
#4
Lexus Champion
I just found out I'll be driving nearly 30,000 miles next year (combination of business trips and personal use). The IS 350 is the only vehicle I have so I'm considering getting a second vehicle to drive for most of these trips (approximately 25,000 of those miles)
I did several calculations to determine if leasing a second vehicle (corolla) would actually save me money by reducing the fuel cost, maintenance cost (i do my own mainteneance so basically just the cost of parts and fluids), and by reducing the amount of vehicle depreciation on the IS.
I currently have 20k miles so I checked to see what the difference was on my trade in value for 25k vs 50k miles. Kelly blue book showed about $6250 difference! Edmunds.com showed only $1400.
So if I use edmunds' estimates, I don't loose very much in depreciation so it ends up being cheaper to keep using the IS for all 30K miles, by about $500 so pretty much a draw. If I use KBB's estimates, I end up saving $4300 a year by driving the Corolla instead.
Which source do you all think is more reliable for estimating the deprectiation of the 350? Any other thoughts appreciated.
I did several calculations to determine if leasing a second vehicle (corolla) would actually save me money by reducing the fuel cost, maintenance cost (i do my own mainteneance so basically just the cost of parts and fluids), and by reducing the amount of vehicle depreciation on the IS.
I currently have 20k miles so I checked to see what the difference was on my trade in value for 25k vs 50k miles. Kelly blue book showed about $6250 difference! Edmunds.com showed only $1400.
So if I use edmunds' estimates, I don't loose very much in depreciation so it ends up being cheaper to keep using the IS for all 30K miles, by about $500 so pretty much a draw. If I use KBB's estimates, I end up saving $4300 a year by driving the Corolla instead.
Which source do you all think is more reliable for estimating the deprectiation of the 350? Any other thoughts appreciated.
Trending Topics
#9
Lexus Test Driver
Forget it. You'd be spending more longterm money by getting a second car. Just drive the IS, it's the best answer.
#13
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think its worth it either. I was in a similar situation and just kept my IS. I put on a ton of miles, but I was happy to be doing it in this car. It made the commute that much better.
#14
Lexus Champion
#15
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good advice here, I'm still on the fence though.
The 2nd vehicle lease I was talking about is for an 09 Corolla. I expect 40 MPG with that since all 30K miles will be highway (well 99% of them).
I get an awesome deal through my company where they pay all maintenance and insurance on the vehicle and I get it at a pretty low price (don't think I can say what it is on a forum though). I also don't have to loose out on any depreciation for a leased vehicle since I'm not buying it.
So taking that into account, my original cost estimates are accurate for long term.
Oh and I own my car, all paid off.
The 2nd vehicle lease I was talking about is for an 09 Corolla. I expect 40 MPG with that since all 30K miles will be highway (well 99% of them).
I get an awesome deal through my company where they pay all maintenance and insurance on the vehicle and I get it at a pretty low price (don't think I can say what it is on a forum though). I also don't have to loose out on any depreciation for a leased vehicle since I'm not buying it.
So taking that into account, my original cost estimates are accurate for long term.
Oh and I own my car, all paid off.
Last edited by TimS9393; 10-01-08 at 03:33 PM.