IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013) Discussion about the 2006+ model IS models

PCV valve location for Catch Can

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-12, 01:23 AM
  #16  
mickificki
Driver School Candidate
 
mickificki's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: California
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sounds like a very doable project. Anyone know it's effectiveness?
Old 07-26-12, 09:21 AM
  #17  
faeflora
Driver School Candidate
 
faeflora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: MD
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
What is the perceived benefit here?

How long did it take to accumulate 15cc of oil? Are you familiar with vacuum system oil migration control, and how putting a device like a catch can inline will promote oil migration? Are you familiar with the baffling in the cam covers and how it acts like your catch can without the undue cooling effect your can has? Do you believe if a simple catch can would solve a significant problem that the OEMs would not use them?

I would like to point out that you have no frikken idea what you are talking about. Also, your water vapor comment was asinine. The PCV valve is solely there for emissions. And yes, OEMs do use catch cans.

For anyone who wants to do this mod it's pretty simple.

Take the two hoses that go to the intake right by the throttle body. Route them to a catch can. Vent the catch can to atmosphere. You want as little restriction as possible for the atmosphere vent.

Even better would be to gut your PCV valves.

Lastly, the purpose of the catch can is not to fill it up with fluid. The purpose is to give the crankcase ventilation without having to burn blowby vapor in your motor. Blowby vapor does not burn well- it detonates. Detonation means your motor will run more roughly and make less HP. Also, better ventilation potentially makes better ring seal. Which also means better HP.

All of this is probably way over the heads of most members here, and the motor will probably run fine for 200K miles without a catch can and a VTA crankcase. If however you want to get an extra 2-5HP and make your engine a little bit happier this could be the trick.
Old 07-26-12, 09:31 AM
  #18  
faeflora
Driver School Candidate
 
faeflora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: MD
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JohnLX300
Bringing this back to life.....I found this

http://drivegeek.wordpress.com/2011/...nd-a-solution/

I was wondering if yutnaka had any carbon buildup issue after this mod has been completed? Any performance issues? Gas mileage increase/decrease?
Originally Posted by mickificki
Sounds like a very doable project. Anyone know it's effectiveness?
That mod is just fine but it would be best for your motor if you made your can VTA rather than route it back into your intake.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
scruggyj
IS F (2008-2014)
25
12-05-23 06:28 AM
az-dave
Performance
134
12-07-22 08:19 PM
banyan
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
6
02-22-16 11:14 AM
ozmanyyy
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
4
04-03-14 11:02 AM
happy1977
Maintenance
13
10-03-11 11:30 AM



Quick Reply: PCV valve location for Catch Can



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:17 AM.