IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013) Discussion about the 2006+ model IS models

Pics of wheels for those at stock height

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-17, 11:37 AM
  #61  
5nX37
Pit Crew
 
5nX37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 150
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Here's mine.. and for reference; before and after FSport springs. Rode on my 19's for a little over a year with stock height. FSport springs make the car look good, but sometimes I wish I was in stock springs riding in comfort..

Niche Targas >> 19x8.5 +35 235/35 (F) 19x9.5 +35 265/30 (R)

Old 05-30-17, 12:17 PM
  #62  
XSV
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
XSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: TX
Posts: 795
Received 63 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Buddiiee
Thank god for this thread, as lowered cars are just silly. They ride worse, and scrape everything from the ground, to the snow, to their own tires sometimes. Screw that. All for just a look... I don't get it. And those Niche Citrines look better than I thought they would. Wow.
thanks!
Old 05-30-17, 04:55 PM
  #63  
bbaugher47
Moderator
 
bbaugher47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: RVA
Posts: 1,912
Received 224 Likes on 195 Posts
Default

5nX37. Car looks great, any more if a side(ish)? profile to show concavity of rear wheels? I'm shopping for wheels and for the life of me I can not make my mind up. Worried the wheels I choose will not have enough concave.
Old 05-30-17, 07:22 PM
  #64  
XSV
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
XSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: TX
Posts: 795
Received 63 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bbaugher47
5nX37. Car looks great, any more if a side(ish)? profile to show concavity of rear wheels? I'm shopping for wheels and for the life of me I can not make my mind up. Worried the wheels I choose will not have enough concave.
I was in the same boat. Took me about a month before pulling the trigger. I wanted my rear to be concave and the front more flush. To my surprise, my wheels came out as I wanted. I'm thinking even though they have the same offset, the rear is wider, so more concave? I don't know, I'm not a wheel expert be any means.
The following users liked this post:
bbaugher47 (05-31-17)
Old 05-30-17, 10:40 PM
  #65  
5nX37
Pit Crew
 
5nX37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 150
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bbaugher47
5nX37. Car looks great, any more if a side(ish)? profile to show concavity of rear wheels? I'm shopping for wheels and for the life of me I can not make my mind up. Worried the wheels I choose will not have enough concave.
Here's one from a slightly different angle and lighting.. These wheels have a modest concavity. Pic doesn't do much justice but they are more concave than it appears on this pic.

Last edited by 5nX37; 05-30-17 at 10:43 PM.
The following users liked this post:
bbaugher47 (05-31-17)
Old 05-31-17, 03:22 AM
  #66  
bbaugher47
Moderator
 
bbaugher47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: RVA
Posts: 1,912
Received 224 Likes on 195 Posts
Default

I've always liked the targas and those citrines look good as well. Been thinking about the veronas myself. Can't decide on 18" or 19". Worried about ride quality of the 19s and increasing the weight of the wheels .
Old 05-31-17, 08:11 AM
  #67  
XSV
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
XSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: TX
Posts: 795
Received 63 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bbaugher47
I've always liked the targas and those citrines look good as well. Been thinking about the veronas myself. Can't decide on 18" or 19". Worried about ride quality of the 19s and increasing the weight of the wheels .
Ride quality on 19" wrapped with aspect ratio of 35 tires: no real difference from 18" with 45 ratio.
MPG with 19" wheels (dependent on wheel weight): my MPG has gone down from 25-26 MPG highway to ~23 MPG highway. My aftermarket wheels are heavier than the stock, esp with the bigger tires.

Stock 18" wheel weights (no tire): Front 28.25 lb / Rear 30.00 lbs
Niche Citrine M161 wheel weights (no tire): 19x9.8 Front 31 lb / 19x9.5 Rear 32 lb
The following users liked this post:
bbaugher47 (05-31-17)
Old 05-31-17, 11:37 AM
  #68  
bbaugher47
Moderator
 
bbaugher47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: RVA
Posts: 1,912
Received 224 Likes on 195 Posts
Default

That's not a terrible difference. Probably wouldn't tell the difference in weight. Maybe I'll follow your route and go 19" with a 35
Old 05-31-17, 12:36 PM
  #69  
XSV
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
XSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: TX
Posts: 795
Received 63 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bbaugher47
That's not a terrible difference. Probably wouldn't tell the difference in weight. Maybe I'll follow your route and go 19" with a 35
car does feel heavier to me, esp in the steering but you get used to it.
Old 05-31-17, 05:26 PM
  #70  
ldc
Lexus Test Driver
 
ldc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 80808
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

When I went from 18s to 19s even though the overall circumstance is smaller the car feels heavier and I have forge wheels. The only thing I can think of is the width of the tires. Fatter tires means more surface contact with road and therefore more friction.
Old 05-31-17, 05:37 PM
  #71  
bbaugher47
Moderator
 
bbaugher47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: RVA
Posts: 1,912
Received 224 Likes on 195 Posts
Default

That does make a lot of sense. About the wider tires . I never thought buying wheels would be so stressful. My jeep was easier since the ride quality already stank.
Old 05-31-17, 06:18 PM
  #72  
ldc
Lexus Test Driver
 
ldc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 80808
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

I drive like a turtle now with all the added weight.
Old 06-08-17, 03:44 PM
  #73  
Droth
Pit Crew
 
Droth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: NZ
Posts: 168
Received 53 Likes on 35 Posts
Default



My JDM 350 stock height 19 x 8.5 35P front 19 x 9.5 40P rear
Old 08-14-20, 12:20 PM
  #74  
farud
Driver School Candidate
 
farud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: CA
Posts: 11
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PMok




AME FS-01s in 19"
Potenza RE11 tires:
235/35-19 F
265/35-19 R

stock height, Sport suspension
Any rubbing issues on the rear with full load (2 passengers, full trunk)?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Manh3
IS F (2008-2014)
4
04-09-17 03:50 PM
jrmckinley
LS - 4th Gen (2007-2017)
2
07-08-16 06:56 PM
KOKISF
IS F (2008-2014)
9
01-01-15 06:41 PM
zabone
IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present)
24
06-18-14 10:02 AM



Quick Reply: Pics of wheels for those at stock height



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:54 PM.