Has anyone tinted their windshield?
#33
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (2)
But if you are drving legally under speed limit and they bust you for an illegal mod, you'll get fined plus fix it ticket. My friend had an integra that was heavily modded and should be deamed off road. But he got hit with a huge fine... cold air intake, header, turbo, too low ( it is illegal to have your tires under any part of your fender in CA), etc... He was running race setup stuff.
#34
Wrong.
The only way a police officer would be able to "legally" call a K9 is if he has "reasonable suspicion" of criminal activity. This "reasonable suspicion" cannot be created by your right to deny consent of the officer to search your car. However, if your car smells like gonga and the cop could smell it, then he will be able to search without your consent. This isn't a state to state thing either. This is the Constitution, which applies equally to all states.
Just a little public service announcement
#35
Wrong.
The only way a police officer would be able to "legally" call a K9 is if he has "reasonable suspicion" of criminal activity. This "reasonable suspicion" cannot be created by your right to deny consent of the officer to search your car. However, if your car smells like gonga and the cop could smell it, then he will be able to search without your consent. This isn't a state to state thing either. This is the Constitution, which applies equally to all states.
Just a little public service announcement
The only way a police officer would be able to "legally" call a K9 is if he has "reasonable suspicion" of criminal activity. This "reasonable suspicion" cannot be created by your right to deny consent of the officer to search your car. However, if your car smells like gonga and the cop could smell it, then he will be able to search without your consent. This isn't a state to state thing either. This is the Constitution, which applies equally to all states.
Just a little public service announcement
Quoted for Truth
#40
Racer
iTrader: (7)
Wrong.
The only way a police officer would be able to "legally" call a K9 is if he has "reasonable suspicion" of criminal activity. This "reasonable suspicion" cannot be created by your right to deny consent of the officer to search your car. However, if your car smells like gonga and the cop could smell it, then he will be able to search without your consent. This isn't a state to state thing either. This is the Constitution, which applies equally to all states.
Just a little public service announcement
The only way a police officer would be able to "legally" call a K9 is if he has "reasonable suspicion" of criminal activity. This "reasonable suspicion" cannot be created by your right to deny consent of the officer to search your car. However, if your car smells like gonga and the cop could smell it, then he will be able to search without your consent. This isn't a state to state thing either. This is the Constitution, which applies equally to all states.
Just a little public service announcement
#41
Haha...yea, I can imagine a judge asking why the police officer decided to search the car and him responding by saying it was his "spidey sense". That won't go over so well. But apparently there are people on this board who think the cop's word is gold, and that they can search your car whenever they feel like it.
#42
Pole Position
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: OHIO
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cops word > anything you say.
didnt you guys see that speeding ticket case that went to the supreme court? the cop quoted say he didnt have a radar or anything to gauge the man's speed by, but it "looked" like he was going 70, so i gave him a ticket on zero proof. the guy fought it all the way to the supreme court and was heavily outvoted... cop>you
also Tint violations (in ohio at least) are a minor misdemeanor, meaning a cop is NOT allowed to pull you over for solely your tint, but this doesnt stop him for making up a bs reason to pull you over anyway...
didnt you guys see that speeding ticket case that went to the supreme court? the cop quoted say he didnt have a radar or anything to gauge the man's speed by, but it "looked" like he was going 70, so i gave him a ticket on zero proof. the guy fought it all the way to the supreme court and was heavily outvoted... cop>you
also Tint violations (in ohio at least) are a minor misdemeanor, meaning a cop is NOT allowed to pull you over for solely your tint, but this doesnt stop him for making up a bs reason to pull you over anyway...
#43
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (65)
cops word > anything you say.
didnt you guys see that speeding ticket case that went to the supreme court? the cop quoted say he didnt have a radar or anything to gauge the man's speed by, but it "looked" like he was going 70, so i gave him a ticket on zero proof. the guy fought it all the way to the supreme court and was heavily outvoted... cop>you
also Tint violations (in ohio at least) are a minor misdemeanor, meaning a cop is NOT allowed to pull you over for solely your tint, but this doesnt stop him for making up a bs reason to pull you over anyway...
didnt you guys see that speeding ticket case that went to the supreme court? the cop quoted say he didnt have a radar or anything to gauge the man's speed by, but it "looked" like he was going 70, so i gave him a ticket on zero proof. the guy fought it all the way to the supreme court and was heavily outvoted... cop>you
also Tint violations (in ohio at least) are a minor misdemeanor, meaning a cop is NOT allowed to pull you over for solely your tint, but this doesnt stop him for making up a bs reason to pull you over anyway...