IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013) Discussion about the 2006+ model IS models

Has anyone tinted their windshield?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-10, 05:01 PM
  #46  
IStrip50
Rookie
iTrader: (1)
 
IStrip50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: AL
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoeCombs
cops word > anything you say.

didnt you guys see that speeding ticket case that went to the supreme court? the cop quoted say he didnt have a radar or anything to gauge the man's speed by, but it "looked" like he was going 70, so i gave him a ticket on zero proof. the guy fought it all the way to the supreme court and was heavily outvoted... cop>you

also Tint violations (in ohio at least) are a minor misdemeanor, meaning a cop is NOT allowed to pull you over for solely your tint, but this doesnt stop him for making up a bs reason to pull you over anyway...

I know of that rule well. It's called pacing. A cop doesn't need to get you on radar or anything like that. All he has to do is follow you and gauge how fast you were going. In that case, yes, his word would be stronger than yours. However, that has nothing to do will illegal search and seizure. I understand the nexus you were trying to establish with the fact that the cops word outranked the citizen's in this case, but again, that has nothing to do with illegal search and seizure.

It's hard to conceptualize, but "pacing" has been established as a proper method of gauging speed in almost every state. Thus, since there is common law precedent establishing that point, it is the "law". Different story for search and seizure seeing that the United States Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled on this area of law. I think I would go with the SCOTUS on this and say that the cop's word would not be greater than yours if he in fact did conduct an illegal search.

That story makes for good news though
Old 07-25-10, 08:58 AM
  #47  
Extreme437
Pole Position
iTrader: (2)
 
Extreme437's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: California
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

After reading through everyone's posts, it seems the biggest worry is that you wont be able to see a pedestrian crossing the street and that you'll run them down. I can understand that but I don't agree. If you stick with 50% or lighter on the front windshield, you shouldn't have any issues at all. I've had people drive my car, including my mother and father who are both ~60 years old and wear corrective lenses, drive my car at night without even questioning it. Note that they do not know nor have they ever noticed or questioned my front windshield being tinted.

I've had front ws tint on my car for about 2 years now and have not had any issues what-so-ever. I've always been able to see where Im going and pedestrians too. The problem in my car is the side front windows that are tinted at 7% which makes it very, very hard to see on some dark back/side roads. If there is ever a question, I simply roll my windows down and proceed cautiously.

I have driven other cars without tinted front ws's and have noticed that headlights and sunlight is a lot brighter and more annoying but I never think to myself, "if only I didnt have front ws tint, I'd be able to see so much more."

As for the law, I've been pulled over numerous times, 5+, in the past couple of years for various things (speeding, front window tint, no plate, etc), but I've never had a single officer even flinch at my windshield; they didn't even notice it. I've received tickets for speeding, no plate, side windows tinted, etc, but never even a comment on the windshield. I have two friends, one in AZ and one in my area (SD, CA) get pulled over and have had the officer comment on the windshield but only one of them got a fix-it for the ws; all the officer did was write a normal front side window fixit ticket and then right under that violation he wrote "front windshield too". I think part of the reason cops don't notice is because they don't know to look. Its such a rare thing for a front ws to be tinted, they don't look nor even think about it even when its right in front of them.

Honestly, the front ws tint only helps me. It cuts down on the glare of the sun off of cars and other objects and helps take the brightness out of direct sun light. Also, speaking of night time driving, the front ws tint helps cut down on the blinding headlights on the opposite side of the road; especially two-lane roads/highways.

Moral of the story, 50% seems to be a good balance of great visibility and good looks. People that are unaware of the front ws tint don't even notice it from the inside or out.
Old 07-25-10, 09:29 AM
  #48  
Micaiah
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Micaiah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Good points, thank you.

*spinning around in circles*
Old 07-25-10, 10:19 AM
  #49  
BradInPhx
Rookie
 
BradInPhx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Extreme437
I think part of the reason cops don't notice is because they don't know to look. Its such a rare thing for a front ws to be tinted, they don't look nor even think about it even when its right in front of them.


I got pulled over once while traveling to AZ from Vegas. I was on the AZ side and the cop pulled me over for tint, but never walked past my front door. He did the tint meter and all, but I don't think he ever saw my front window. Cops usually dont walk to the front of the car.
Old 07-26-10, 11:35 AM
  #50  
B16da9
Racer
iTrader: (7)
 
B16da9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,882
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IStrip50
I know of that rule well. It's called pacing. A cop doesn't need to get you on radar or anything like that. All he has to do is follow you and gauge how fast you were going. In that case, yes, his word would be stronger than yours. However, that has nothing to do will illegal search and seizure. I understand the nexus you were trying to establish with the fact that the cops word outranked the citizen's in this case, but again, that has nothing to do with illegal search and seizure.

It's hard to conceptualize, but "pacing" has been established as a proper method of gauging speed in almost every state. Thus, since there is common law precedent establishing that point, it is the "law". Different story for search and seizure seeing that the United States Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled on this area of law. I think I would go with the SCOTUS on this and say that the cop's word would not be greater than yours if he in fact did conduct an illegal search.

That story makes for good news though
A good traffic lawyer would get you out of this by asking the officer to show proof of the last time the speedometer on his cruiser was last calibrated and certified.
Old 07-26-10, 12:54 PM
  #51  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I wear Ray Bans instead of tinting front windshield (left in car at all times in sunglasses holder) w/35% tint on all other windows.
Old 07-28-10, 12:44 PM
  #52  
yt35
Rookie
 
yt35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

do you think cops will notice?
Old 07-28-10, 12:47 PM
  #53  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by yt35
do you think cops will notice?
73% tint, no.
Old 07-29-10, 02:49 PM
  #54  
Silver10
Lexus Test Driver
 
Silver10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: 954/718
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

5% all windows and 50% on WS and never a problem..... Florida sun is extreme
Old 07-29-10, 04:14 PM
  #55  
IStrip50
Rookie
iTrader: (1)
 
IStrip50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: AL
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by B16da9
A good traffic lawyer would get you out of this by asking the officer to show proof of the last time the speedometer on his cruiser was last calibrated and certified.
Creative, but unfortunately it doesn't, and wont, work. Now, if the cop car was 15-20 years old it might be a winning argument.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
05ls430518
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
0
02-11-19 11:12 AM
jsnlwrnc87
LS - 3rd Gen (2001-2006)
19
01-30-17 07:07 PM
JETLEX
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
2
07-03-12 08:55 AM
LifeEnjoyr
GX - 1st Gen (2003-2009)
11
10-06-11 11:25 AM
kyang91
GS - 3rd Gen (2006-2011)
37
04-26-09 07:07 PM



Quick Reply: Has anyone tinted their windshield?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:42 PM.