IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013) Discussion about the 2006+ model IS models

3.6mpg help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-10, 05:37 PM
  #31  
Raralith
Intermediate
 
Raralith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Acingteam
^ I'm sure that's your butt dyno talking. You won't really notice a 20-30whp difference in a car (especially of this weight)... and I'm sure you didn't gain anything close to that with just an intake.
You will notice 20-30whp, and that's a huge gain for the IS 350. I'm probably only getting 10-15whp more from intake and full catback exhaust, and my times on the drag strip definately improved even factoring in the environment. But, 20-30 whp from an intake though, not likely.
Old 12-07-10, 05:42 PM
  #32  
BlkSapPrl7
Driver
 
BlkSapPrl7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: IN
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

your 350 has 12 injectors that fires on cold start.
Old 12-07-10, 05:44 PM
  #33  
Acingteam
Intermediate
iTrader: (2)
 
Acingteam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: CT
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Raralith
You will notice 20-30whp, and that's a huge gain for the IS 350. I'm probably only getting 10-15whp more from intake and full catback exhaust, and my times on the drag strip definately improved even factoring in the environment. But, 20-30 whp from an intake though, not likely.
I disagree. Will you see results? Yes (minimal). Will you actually feel it? Unlikely.

When I had my WRX, mind you the car weighs about 700lbs less, I had the car tuned and jumped 25whp on a Mustang Dyno. I couldn't tell the difference in power. I went from 254whp to 279whp... the car felt more responsive, but that was because of a tune.

Either way the intake would not be a "night and day" difference.
Old 12-07-10, 09:06 PM
  #34  
IS350rock
Driver
Thread Starter
 
IS350rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: wa
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Acingteam
I disagree. Will you see results? Yes (minimal). Will you actually feel it? Unlikely.

When I had my WRX, mind you the car weighs about 700lbs less, I had the car tuned and jumped 25whp on a Mustang Dyno. I couldn't tell the difference in power. I went from 254whp to 279whp... the car felt more responsive, but that was because of a tune.

Either way the intake would not be a "night and day" difference.
On my intake I notice a huge dirence in my acceleration
Old 12-08-10, 05:45 AM
  #35  
Kurtz
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Kurtz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 7,810
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IS350rock
On my intake I notice a huge dirence in my acceleration
You really don't.

You imagine one, but it's just your imagination.

If you actually measured your acceleration times you'd see no significant difference.

An intake, by itself, won't provide more than about 5 rwhp.

Which is not noticable at all, let alone a "huge difference"

The electronic snake oil I mention might give you another 5-10 until the ECU tunes it back out... which again won't amount to a "huge difference"

Short ram intakes such as yours can add a huge amount of noise though- and many people confuse that with horsepower.
Old 12-08-10, 06:02 AM
  #36  
heyarms
Pole Position
iTrader: (5)
 
heyarms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SoTX
Posts: 2,918
Received 37 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Can i go ahead and ask? How old are you, IS350Rock? How much experience with cars do you have?

And really, take the best advice given by the forum and remove your intake to try and resolve your problem. Even the "imaginary huge gains" your intake gives, i doubt is worth 3.6mpg.
Old 12-08-10, 10:53 AM
  #37  
isthrizzy
Lead Lap
 
isthrizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

OP - are you refilling your tank after driving 40-50 miles? B/C that's what would have to happen if you got 3.5 mpg. If that's the case, revert back to your stock intake set up and see if that resolves the problem. If not, then maybe you need to bring it to the dealer (with stock set up in place) and have them evaluate things.

I find it hard to believe you get 3.5 mph and there is no engine warning light, etc. B/C with that crappy of mileage there would certainly have to be something wrong with the car.
Old 12-08-10, 05:20 PM
  #38  
sjgIS350
Lead Lap
 
sjgIS350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: WA
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default I think we need a math lesson too.

I really don't understand the gibberish in the original post.

It sound to me that the car has a non-stock intake and the displayed mpg (current and or tank) is fluctuating greatly.

So...lets find out what your actual MPG is.

1) fill tank
2) reset one of the trip odometers
3) drive the car normally until you are just about empty
4) fill tank again.
5) take note of how many gallons it takes
6)Check the miles on the trip odometer you reset in step 2)
7)Divide (this is the math part) the miles from step by the gallons in step 5. MPG = Miles/gallons

What is the answer? Somewhere around 20?
Old 12-08-10, 06:10 PM
  #39  
juice14
Lexus Champion
 
juice14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ga
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I got more than that at the track, thats crazy... like some have said.. just try driving a whole tank and look at the tank avg. city you should get at least 16 and hwy you should get low to mid 20s considering you dirve pretty agressive
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
metaleckz
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
23
06-23-14 02:47 PM
Shervin021
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
59
02-10-12 09:28 PM
718murdoc
SC- 1st Gen (1992-2000)
44
04-18-11 11:02 PM
SocalSo350
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
39
05-20-08 02:33 PM
wjimmy
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
31
05-20-07 09:57 AM



Quick Reply: 3.6mpg help



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:06 AM.