IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present) Discussion about the 2014+ model IS models

2014 LEXUS IS Official Debut Discussion (merged threads)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-13 | 03:23 PM
  #316  
SoCal1984's Avatar
SoCal1984
Rookie
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

I know this is a pre production model but does that mean that what will hit the dealerships will look differently much like the concept versions do?
Old 01-10-13 | 03:29 PM
  #317  
cino's Avatar
cino
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by SoCal1984
I know this is a pre production model but does that mean that what will hit the dealerships will look differently much like the concept versions do?
Not a chance. That's the final design for production version.
Old 01-10-13 | 03:30 PM
  #318  
SoCal1984's Avatar
SoCal1984
Rookie
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
looks like it eats babies. german babies.

:-)
Lexus should use this as the 2014 Slogan: "Class leading combination of performance and luxury, styling that looks like it eats babies, german babies. The 2014 Lexus IS F-Sport, the pursuit of perfection."

Last edited by SoCal1984; 01-10-13 at 03:33 PM.
Old 01-10-13 | 03:31 PM
  #319  
peteharvey's Avatar
peteharvey
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,401
Likes: 494
From: Ca
Default

Originally Posted by cino
There is a magic called marketing. I like the new redesign Kia but not Hyundai, but Hyundai sells more car than Kia because of heavy marketing campaign, I believe most people will agree than Kia models look better.

Same goes to mobile industry. No one can name 3 things Apple really invented, but still think Apple invented everything. That's because of the marketing... "Look what we invented" said Steve Jobs.
It's actually primarily the product quality that creates the reputation, that in turn creates the name/badge - that is selling it for both Hyundai and Apple.
Marketing/discounting/leasing etc are secondary factors. Yes they do play a role, but a lesser role.

The confusion and secret to understanding here is this.
In the past, Hyundai has a superior history/reputation for building better cars than Kia.
However, presently the Kia may be superior to the Hyundai, in the present reality, as you say.
But, consumers have been flooded and clouded by the reputation of Hyundai's superior past.
Hence, the name/brand/image and sales is still in Hyundai's favor, despite Hyundai having the inferior car.
Likewise, sometimes we see that Lexus makes a superior 4GS, but sales still goes towards Benz and Beamers with their longer and superior reputations.

Theoretically, in time, if Kia keeps their product quality up, Kia's reputation and name will rise, while Hyundai's name and reputation will fall, unless either companies do something to change their current situation.
Thus, it takes time for Kia and Lexus to both rebuild their reputation.
Now, if Lexus comes up with a 3IS that is controversial like Chris Bangle's 2005 3 Series, does that help? No.
When Lexus does something silly, like come up with a bland tail for the 4GS, or controversial polarized styling for the 3IS as some posters have remarked here, Lexus really hurts its name/badge/image and reputation - it takes a step backwards.

Over the years, Lexus has shot itself in the foot a lot, but BM & Benz shoot themselves in the foot too; it's all about the net overall progress in quality that determines the name/badge/image/reputation.
Thus, presently, Benz still has the gong over BM, which still has the gong over Lexus.
Likewise, Hyundai still has a better name than Kia.
Meanwhile, the name/badge/image/reputation is not necessarily the reality at all.


Marketing is one of the secondary factors, that plays a smaller role.
Think of it this way - no amount of [secondary] marketing will make up for, and save the Palm Pilot, nor Blackberry.
Nokia is making a come back with its new Lumia 920, thanks to the product itself.
Previously, when the products were not so good, the Nokia name actually went down, and sales went down too.
Lately, the Nokia brand is on the rise again, hence sales are on the rise once again.

That's why the new 3 Series is so big and spacious [though it does sacrifice dynamics in the process], and without the controversial Chris Bangle styling of 2005 - because that's what the mass market wants, hence attaining 100k units/yr in the USA...

Last edited by peteharvey; 01-10-13 at 04:39 PM.
Old 01-10-13 | 03:35 PM
  #320  
SoCal1984's Avatar
SoCal1984
Rookie
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by cino
Not a chance. That's the final design for production version.
Excellent! With more space and aggressive styling I am split on whether to spend the extra ~8K for a GS350 F-Sport Pkg over the IS350 F-Sport Pkg. I will have to wait to see what packages the `14 IS350 will offer. I like the 8 Speed Tranny.
Old 01-10-13 | 04:28 PM
  #321  
nastyemu's Avatar
nastyemu
Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

even when i look through my lexus rose colored glasses this thing is still hideous. i think i'll have to pass on this generation.
Old 01-10-13 | 05:55 PM
  #322  
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,963
Likes: 176
Default

Originally Posted by SoCal1984
Lexus should use this as the 2014 Slogan: "Class leading combination of performance and luxury, styling that looks like it eats babies, german babies. The 2014 Lexus IS F-Sport, the pursuit of perfection."
IS-F going fast on the road while german vehicles scramble to move and end up in the ditch :-)
Old 01-10-13 | 06:35 PM
  #323  
Skip's Avatar
Skip
Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Damn, This car is ugly! Looks more like a Tonka toy than a luxury sport sedan. For Lexus sake, I hope this car looks better in person than in photos. I have been a Lexus owner since 1990, and, this is the worst looking car they have ever built.
Old 01-10-13 | 07:10 PM
  #324  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by peteharvey
No problems with the F Sport, or the even sportier IS-F.
Just need to tone down a bit for the mainstream buyer...
For you. You want toned down, there are plenty of other options non-Lexus.

Originally Posted by peteharvey
Now that we have seen what the F Sport looks like, we can roughly predict the shape of the base model.
However, I suspect that the base 3IS is too sporty, or too radical for the mass public.

Look at this BMW forum below, at see how other people view our 3IS, and they are a significantly bigger group than us: http://www.f30post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=789893


Btw, one rough way to take into account the effect of the ES on IS and GS sales is to total the sales of all 3 models up for the USA in 2012:
ES 56,158
IS 27,708
GS 22,160
Total = 106,026

3 Series 99,602
5 Series [without 6 Series of 8,208] @ 56,798
Total = 156,400

C Class 81,697
E Class [without CLS of 8,065] @ 65,171
Total = 146,868

Thus, even with the ES sedan included, and considering how much cheaper the three Lexus models are relative to their German counterparts, Lexus still trails BM and Benz by a long way.
It helps to have not just more engine & suspension variations, but also more body variations to cater for the different tastes in the mainstream mass market.
Note how the 6 Series & CLS body variations contribute about 8,000+ units each, in sales?

As it stands, I suspect the 3IS won't do well in the mainstream mass market, just like the 22,160 units of the GS against the 56,796 5 Series and 65,171 E Classes.
Even when we take the ES into account, it's still 106k ES/S/GS versus 157k 3/5 Series, and 146k C/E Classes.

The mass market has a more conservative taste, and not so radical.
Sales ultimately increases the profitability to pour back into R&D, and without solid R&D, the company faces a bleak future with delayed 8 speed gear boxes etc etc.


Interestingly, did the GS fail to meet its minimum target of 2k per month?
It's one thing to design for enthusiasts; it's another thing to design for the mass public.
Sales are all about the tastes of the mass market...
This if flawed b/c
1. You only looked at last years sales, the last year of the IS. They sold around 60k IS's their first full year of sales.
2. The IS will NEVER sell like the 3 series. The 3 series is BMWs bread and butter. The 2 cars compete but their sales goals are completely different.

You nor I know about the profitability of the IS but it is pretty safe to assume since its based off the GS and the car has always sold well and met sales goals it is profitable. Otherwise Lexus would dump the car.

Originally Posted by peteharvey
It's actually primarily the product quality that creates the reputation, that in turn creates the name/badge - that is selling it for both Hyundai and Apple.
Marketing/discounting/leasing etc are secondary factors. Yes they do play a role, but a lesser role.

The confusion and secret to understanding here is this.
In the past, Hyundai has a superior history/reputation for building better cars than Kia.
However, presently the Kia may be superior to the Hyundai, in the present reality, as you say.
But, consumers have been flooded and clouded by the reputation of Hyundai's superior past.
Hence, the name/brand/image and sales is still in Hyundai's favor, despite Hyundai having the inferior car.
Likewise, sometimes we see that Lexus makes a superior 4GS, but sales still goes towards Benz and Beamers with their longer and superior reputations.

Theoretically, in time, if Kia keeps their product quality up, Kia's reputation and name will rise, while Hyundai's name and reputation will fall, unless either companies do something to change their current situation.
Thus, it takes time for Kia and Lexus to both rebuild their reputation.
Now, if Lexus comes up with a 3IS that is controversial like Chris Bangle's 2005 3 Series, does that help? No.
When Lexus does something silly, like come up with a bland tail for the 4GS, or controversial polarized styling for the 3IS as some posters have remarked here, Lexus really hurts its name/badge/image and reputation - it takes a step backwards.

Over the years, Lexus has shot itself in the foot a lot, but BM & Benz shoot themselves in the foot too; it's all about the net overall progress in quality that determines the name/badge/image/reputation.
Thus, presently, Benz still has the gong over BM, which still has the gong over Lexus.
Likewise, Hyundai still has a better name than Kia.
Meanwhile, the name/badge/image/reputation is not necessarily the reality at all.


Marketing is one of the secondary factors, that plays a smaller role.
Think of it this way - no amount of [secondary] marketing will make up for, and save the Palm Pilot, nor Blackberry.
Nokia is making a come back with its new Lumia 920, thanks to the product itself.
Previously, when the products were not so good, the Nokia name actually went down, and sales went down too.
Lately, the Nokia brand is on the rise again, hence sales are on the rise once again.

That's why the new 3 Series is so big and spacious [though it does sacrifice dynamics in the process], and without the controversial Chris Bangle styling of 2005 - because that's what the mass market wants, hence attaining 100k units/yr in the USA...
I agree its the product but it also is effective marketing. The two go hand in hand. Marketing can sell people a terrible product, we both know of many cars that were not good that sold like hotcakes and cars that were very good and sold poorly due to terrible marketing.

The 3 series also grew to make room for the 1 series, along with a shift in taste to a larger car. Its amazing to sit in an E30 and then an F30!
Old 01-10-13 | 07:20 PM
  #325  
giantdefy's Avatar
giantdefy
Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 156
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Skip
Damn, This car is ugly! Looks more like a Tonka toy than a luxury sport sedan. For Lexus sake, I hope this car looks better in person than in photos. I have been a Lexus owner since 1990, and, this is the worst looking car they have ever built.
I was hoping for a nicer looking IS, but I'm having issues liking this car. Wondering if the non F sport model might have a less aggressive front end treatment. I find the swoosh lights on the bumper out of place, the spindle grille looked better on previous renderings with the bumper running through the center. the rear tail lights viewed from the side seem to go way too low for me. On the other hand, the view from the rear looks fantastic and they did a super job on the interior.
I planned on trading-in my IS250 for the new model, but I think I'll pass.
Old 01-10-13 | 07:20 PM
  #326  
EthanV's Avatar
EthanV
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 628
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Skip
Damn, This car is ugly! Looks more like a Tonka toy than a luxury sport sedan. For Lexus sake, I hope this car looks better in person than in photos. I have been a Lexus owner since 1990, and, this is the worst looking car they have ever built.
Lets see I dont think they will let the IS fail
Old 01-10-13 | 07:27 PM
  #327  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 75,609
Likes: 2,582
From: Present
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
Also, this car MUST be judged IN PERSON. There are FAR too many intricate curves, and styling cues to judge it in photos. The styling on the car is incredible, and the details need to be seen in person to be appreciated.
have you seen it in person?

I can see some of you are very turned off by the styling, and that's the point.
by this logic, the pontiac aztek should have sold like hotcakes.

The new IS however is NOT for you. It's catering to a younger demographic.
guessing critics here have been a wide variety of ages.

How can you be so sure this design will "die off fast"?
i know not directed at me, and i'm not sure it will, but you have repeatedly said that more edgy designs don't do well over time.

No it's not a "fail", not at all. The demographic this car is aiming for prefers a sporty setup, and a foot parking brake is the sportier setup.
it is? tell that to a drifter.

Originally Posted by Blueprint
What is funny is people are acting so shocked when Lexus said that the LF CC is a preview of the next IS design.
Originally Posted by Blueprint
Lexus apologies for telling people the LF-CC was a preview of the next IS and well the next IS does indeed look like the LF-CC
well, this IS looks VERY little like the LF CC to me (particularly from the side) except for the giant front grill, aka, the shnoz.

Originally Posted by Skip
Damn, This car is ugly! Looks more like a Tonka toy than a luxury sport sedan. For Lexus sake, I hope this car looks better in person than in photos. I have been a Lexus owner since 1990, and, this is the worst looking car they have ever built.
i disagree. i think that title goes hands down to the HS.

Last edited by bitkahuna; 01-10-13 at 07:34 PM.
Old 01-10-13 | 07:30 PM
  #328  
cino's Avatar
cino
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by peteharvey

Marketing is one of the secondary factors, that plays a smaller role.
Think of it this way - no amount of [secondary] marketing will make up for, and save the Palm Pilot, nor Blackberry.
Nokia is making a come back with its new Lumia 920, thanks to the product itself.
Previously, when the products were not so good, the Nokia name actually went down, and sales went down too.
Lately, the Nokia brand is on the rise again, hence sales are on the rise once again.

That's why the new 3 Series is so big and spacious [though it does sacrifice dynamics in the process], and without the controversial Chris Bangle styling of 2005 - because that's what the mass market wants, hence attaining 100k units/yr in the USA...
3 Series is weak and less refined compare to the previous gen.

Marketing will let a company sell their terrible product for a few generations.
And if Blackberry invest so much into marketing (not just advertising), their Blackberry 10 will sell like hot cake. You know how much did the Giant Microsoft spend on Nokia to advertise their new Lumia 920 and other Lumias? Without money to create a lot of hype around the windows 8 ecosystem, WP8 will not sell same goes to Hyundai case. You also said it that because history shows that Hyundai was more superior, so even Kia surpasses it, people still go to Hyundia. It's like BMW and Lexus.
Old 01-10-13 | 07:30 PM
  #329  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 75,609
Likes: 2,582
From: Present
Default

looking at these two pics, are they actually the same front end?



Old 01-10-13 | 07:41 PM
  #330  
peteharvey's Avatar
peteharvey
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,401
Likes: 494
From: Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Blueprint
This if flawed b/c
1. You only looked at last years sales, the last year of the IS. They sold around 60k IS's their first full year of sales.
2. The IS will NEVER sell like the 3 series. The 3 series is BMWs bread and butter. The 2 cars compete but their sales goals are completely different.

You nor I know about the profitability of the IS but it is pretty safe to assume since its based off the GS and the car has always sold well and met sales goals it is profitable. Otherwise Lexus would dump the car...
At its peak, the IS sold 54,933 in 2007 USA.
3 Series peaked at 142,490 also in 2007.
C Class peaked at 89,607 just last year.

Sure, it is mainly the name/badge/image, and not necessarily the car.
All the manufacturers market pretty well, so I can't see marketing playing a major role for the IS to match the C Class, or the C Class to catch up to the 3 Series...




Originally Posted by Blueprint
For you. You want toned down, there are plenty of other options non-Lexus...
We're both humans - and it is normal for two people to have different tastes.
I could say to you that you want a sporty bias, and that there are other options non-Lexus for you too.
It's just two different opinions from two different people.

Thus, it's better to comment on our own opinion of the car, rather than trying to "quote" and put down another member's opinion.
It would be better if we all try to have some etiquette, and avoid quoting others negatively, and making remarks like:
"John Smith you are wrong".
"I disagree with you".
"I believe that"...
We could all do without these negative quotations and phrases.
It is better if we can all just focus on voicing our own opinions, without having to deny another person of their opinions, and trying to put their opinions down...



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:52 AM.