IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present) Discussion about the 2014+ model IS models

In the market... debating between IS 200t and IS 300

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-19 | 04:15 PM
  #1  
mokflurry's Avatar
mokflurry
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: BC
Default In the market... debating between IS 200t and IS 300

I'm in the market for a used Lexus 3IS and I've been looking primarily at 2016-2017 IS 200t because the fuel economy is significantly better and I have no use for AWD .I 'm coming from a compact economy car so power to me doesn't mean much though some low end torque does appeal to me hence why I'm looking at the IS 200t. Unfortunately, there seems to be much fewer IS 200t in the market so I'm considering an IS 300 as well.

Has anyone driven both and can comment on the differences (particularly in driving feel)?
Old 02-13-19 | 06:13 PM
  #2  
jmull3r's Avatar
jmull3r
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 246
From: California
Default

haven’t driven the 2.0l IS, but you are better off with the 300, in real world driving the 4 cyl honestly from what i’ve seen does not get much better gas mileage at all, you’ll appreciate the smooth V6 with plenty of power with the 300, plus it’s tuneable to make it a 350 for $450 from RR Racing if you do get the itch for more power
Old 02-13-19 | 11:09 PM
  #3  
mrmle03's Avatar
mrmle03
Driver School Candidate
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 38
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default

If you are concerned about gas mileage then the 200t makes sense -- but you'll feel that turbo lag when you get on it vs the IS300
Old 02-14-19 | 04:51 AM
  #4  
Flash5's Avatar
Flash5
Pole Position
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,627
Likes: 459
From: GA
Default

The gas mileage is a sham lol. I get like 24 MPG avg with my 4 banger turbo. None of the IS get really good gas mileage. The BEST I’ve done is 31 MPG and that was a long straight flat drive on the interstate. The 350 can manage these numbers as well. Don’t make a decision based on MPG.
Old 02-14-19 | 09:20 AM
  #5  
arentz07's Avatar
arentz07
Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 4,009
From: GA
Default

24 is still better than the 19 I've been getting in my 300 AWD. But I agree, MPG shouldn't be a major factor. You're already buying an IS, might as well get the one you like to drive.
Old 02-14-19 | 10:38 AM
  #6  
LouisV's Avatar
LouisV
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 164
Likes: 10
From: Ontario
Default

I have a 200T and its tons of fun. Dont listen to what people say.
Old 02-14-19 | 10:43 AM
  #7  
arentz07's Avatar
arentz07
Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 4,009
From: GA
Default

Originally Posted by LouisV
I have a 200T and its tons of fun. Dont listen to what people say.
No one said the 200T isn't fun. However, engine refinement is definitely not its strongest attribute - just a fact of it having only four cylinders. That said, I've heard that because it's RWD and lighter than the 300 AWD, you do have a bit more agility in the 200T.

What I said was to buy the one that the OP liked the best, without worrying about gas mileage.
Old 02-14-19 | 10:55 AM
  #8  
pngo's Avatar
pngo
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 389
Likes: 82
From: San Diego
Default

I average 34-35 mpg on the highway and have gotten up to 36-37 before. On local, I never get past 23 or so.
Old 02-14-19 | 10:57 AM
  #9  
LouisV's Avatar
LouisV
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 164
Likes: 10
From: Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by arentz07
No one said the 200T isn't fun. However, engine refinement is definitely not its strongest attribute - just a fact of it having only four cylinders. That said, I've heard that because it's RWD and lighter than the 300 AWD, you do have a bit more agility in the 200T.

What I said was to buy the one that the OP liked the best, without worrying about gas mileage.
I never said that you said that but I was just implying what you already did...to get what your heart desires
Old 02-14-19 | 11:14 AM
  #10  
Flash5's Avatar
Flash5
Pole Position
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,627
Likes: 459
From: GA
Default

IF I were to do it again, I would PROBABLY still get the 300 RWD (aka 200t). Something about inline 4’s with a turbo excites me lol. I think it’s because I had a NA V6 already haha.
Old 02-14-19 | 03:57 PM
  #11  
arentz07's Avatar
arentz07
Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 4,009
From: GA
Default

Originally Posted by Flash5
IF I were to do it again, I would PROBABLY still get the 300 RWD (aka 200t). Something about inline 4’s with a turbo excites me lol. I think it’s because I had a NA V6 already haha.
Part of me wishes I had one, just for the RWD dynamics. AWD is great for utility and for snow, but most of the time, it's not really necessary. I have a friend who has a 350 RWD and seems to have no trouble in the snow here.
Old 02-14-19 | 08:14 PM
  #12  
EXE46's Avatar
EXE46
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 581
Likes: 27
From: Sofla
Default

200T is agile and once boost builds it's very capable as a daily. The single best attribute of this car is the agility, it's the highlight of driving this car daily.
Old 02-14-19 | 08:36 PM
  #13  
387's Avatar
387
Intermediate
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 288
Likes: 52
From: Toronto, ON
Default

The 3.5L V6 is older but reliable and proven. The 2.0 turbo is new but seems to have growing pains.

I appreciate the AWD in cold, wet and snowy conditions just as much as on dry, hot pavement. The AWD just grabs.

I was between a new 2016 IS200T F Sport vs used 2014 IS350 AWD F Sport off lease and went with the later two years back. No regrets...
Old 02-14-19 | 10:53 PM
  #14  
TonyN's Avatar
TonyN
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 980
Likes: 122
From: Tucson
Default

I went with the 200t for mpg, the last 4 months and 8k miles has yielded me 29.3mpg with 50/50 highway and city driving, mixture of eco and normal mode.
Old 02-15-19 | 03:33 AM
  #15  
Flash5's Avatar
Flash5
Pole Position
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,627
Likes: 459
From: GA
Default

Originally Posted by TonyN
I went with the 200t for mpg, the last 4 months and 8k miles has yielded me 29.3mpg with 50/50 highway and city driving, mixture of eco and normal mode.
That’s pretty impressive you must have a lot of flat roads with minimal stopping. Lol



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:55 PM.