Latest info on Lexus 4IS powerplant... (hold onto your seats for this one)
#16
#17
That's an odd prediction, considering the current LC 500 and RC F are already fairly close to 500. From a 3.5-liter turbo, 500 is very much possible... But even then, with a lot more midrange torque, even mid-400s would be more than enough power to be a proper "F" car as we know them now. Sure, it'll still be outrun by the 63 AMGs, the Ms, etc., but it would at least maintain current acceleration figures, particularly combined with some form of weight loss. /theorying
The following users liked this post:
Solara350 (04-19-19)
#20
#21
lol @ guy asking for 450-500hp on an IS. Thats C7/5.0L Mustang territory.
Yes Lexus IS lineup needs a HP boost, but they aren't in a HP war with other manufacturers. They know they have legendary reliability/low maintenance costs on their side, and won't jeopardize that. How many IS250/200t's do you see on the road compared to C300/330i/A5? They are doing just fine in their segment. One of the reasons why the ISF/RCF/GSF, isn't doing as well is they were/are trying to compete with the M3/M5/C63 AMG on a HP front and that just isn't Lexus. Those that are craving HP (as their number 1 priority) aren't going to give the F lineup a second look.
My prediction is maybe a 330-350 crank HP for the next gen IS. And thats an aggressive prediction. Now if they are going to use a V6 or I6, I'm not sure.
Yes Lexus IS lineup needs a HP boost, but they aren't in a HP war with other manufacturers. They know they have legendary reliability/low maintenance costs on their side, and won't jeopardize that. How many IS250/200t's do you see on the road compared to C300/330i/A5? They are doing just fine in their segment. One of the reasons why the ISF/RCF/GSF, isn't doing as well is they were/are trying to compete with the M3/M5/C63 AMG on a HP front and that just isn't Lexus. Those that are craving HP (as their number 1 priority) aren't going to give the F lineup a second look.
My prediction is maybe a 330-350 crank HP for the next gen IS. And thats an aggressive prediction. Now if they are going to use a V6 or I6, I'm not sure.
#22
lol @ guy asking for 450-500hp on an IS. Thats C7/5.0L Mustang territory.
Yes Lexus IS lineup needs a HP boost, but they aren't in a HP war with other manufacturers. They know they have legendary reliability/low maintenance costs on their side, and won't jeopardize that. How many IS250/200t's do you see on the road compared to C300/330i/A5? They are doing just fine in their segment. One of the reasons why the ISF/RCF/GSF, isn't doing as well is they were/are trying to compete with the M3/M5/C63 AMG on a HP front and that just isn't Lexus. Those that are craving HP (as their number 1 priority) aren't going to give the F lineup a second look.
My prediction is maybe a 330-350 crank HP for the next gen IS. And thats an aggressive prediction. Now if they are going to use a V6 or I6, I'm not sure.
Yes Lexus IS lineup needs a HP boost, but they aren't in a HP war with other manufacturers. They know they have legendary reliability/low maintenance costs on their side, and won't jeopardize that. How many IS250/200t's do you see on the road compared to C300/330i/A5? They are doing just fine in their segment. One of the reasons why the ISF/RCF/GSF, isn't doing as well is they were/are trying to compete with the M3/M5/C63 AMG on a HP front and that just isn't Lexus. Those that are craving HP (as their number 1 priority) aren't going to give the F lineup a second look.
My prediction is maybe a 330-350 crank HP for the next gen IS. And thats an aggressive prediction. Now if they are going to use a V6 or I6, I'm not sure.
#25
I don't even see the next IS cracking 400hp unless there is an ISF version. The 100k LC500 doesn't even hit 500hp.
The following users liked this post:
JDR76 (02-20-19)
#26
IS 350 no longer competes with the midrange engine options anymore, such as the BMW 340i, C43, or even G70 3.3T. And the RC F, while mostly competitive in terms of handling, was never better in terms of acceleration than its rivals. Maybe from 60-120 it was comparable, but certainly not 0-60, as it lacked the low-end torque of its turbocharged competition.
I'd say it seems like time for Lexus to actually throw down this time. I definitely support the idea of a TT V6 option, hopefully with significantly more power than in the LS. If they stick with the NA V8, let's hope they at least can shed some weight. I understand your viewpoint - better to be pessimistic than to have your hopes shattered. Don't get me wrong, 300ish horsepower is enough for me as a daily, but I am thinking they've sat on their laurels long enough.
#28
#30
You expect their entry level sedan will come close to 500hp? Come on! And what is with the obsession with this much horsepower these days? Who needs that much horsepower, unless you take it to a track. We all like power and want more of it with the Lexus IS, but expecting that much of a jump is setting yourself up for disappointment.
I don't even see the next IS cracking 400hp unless there is an ISF version. The 100k LC500 doesn't even hit 500hp.
I don't even see the next IS cracking 400hp unless there is an ISF version. The 100k LC500 doesn't even hit 500hp.