IS 500 Threads Conversations specifically about the 2022+ IS500 models.

The V8 is back: IS 500 F SPORT Performance. Part 2 2022 Sales & Delivery Discussions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-22, 07:35 PM
  #271  
05RollaXRS
Lexus Test Driver
 
05RollaXRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 9,901
Received 2,478 Likes on 1,783 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by macmaster
The IS500 will definitely beat the IS F the same way it did the LC500.

LC500 0-60: 4.6s
IS500 0-60: 4.4s
IS F 0-60: 4.6s
I will try to make this as objective as possible..

Considering on paper the power-to-weight ratio is similar between RCF and IS500 (around 8.4 lbs/HP) while the ISF has a power-to-weight ratio is about 9.1 lbs/HP, on paper it favors the RCF or the IS500. However, it is complicated. The reason for that is, the ISF gearing overall is very different due to different wheel/tire circumference (especially for the RCF with the big 275/35/19 rear tires) and also the ~ 600 rpm higher rev range.

The RCF is geared optimally for all-out acceleration while ISF is geared optimally for the 1/4 mile because it shifts from 3rd to 4th much earlier (around 94 mph) than the RCF, which shift from 3rd to 4th about 4 - 5 mph before the 1/4 mile trap (around 110 mph). So, if that 3rd to 4th shift just before the 1/4 mile trap and have not gotten back into the "meat" of the powerband (above 6000 rpm), you easily lose a couple of tenths. An ISF would be more consistently in the "meat' of its powerband because it shifted to 4th long before the 1/4 mile trap. Not sure why Lexus had to make RCF's 3rd gear so damn tall? (it does work much better in long sweeping turns) That is why, in theory it should be close in the 1/4 mile times between an ISF and RCF. Quickest stock RCF achieved has been 12.5 seconds. People have reduced the rear tire pressures down to 27 PSI on the RCF to get the gearing shorten down, which significantly improved 1/4 mile times down to 12.3 seconds.

This video shows what I said above. the ISF and RCF stock for stock, is usually down to the launch up to 80 mph. However, that top end power and longer rev range starts to show up after 80 mph and RCF starts to pull away steadily up to 140 - 150 mph. However, once you put a few bolts on the ISF, it gets very close in a straight line. An ISF with intake/header/exhaust is considered a very close race with an RCF with a full catback exhaust in a straight line.


Last edited by 05RollaXRS; 05-28-22 at 12:04 PM.
The following 5 users liked this post by 05RollaXRS:
arentz07 (06-01-22), DLPTony (05-28-22), konichiwa3 (05-27-22), macmaster (05-27-22), wthrman2 (05-28-22)
Old 06-01-22, 05:20 AM
  #272  
wthrman2
Lead Lap
 
wthrman2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: ON
Posts: 3,596
Received 3,692 Likes on 1,785 Posts
Default

I am sure you guys have seen that the V6 was taken out of the Highlander, now its out of the Lexus RX so we are lucky that they approved dropping the V8 in our IS and I am some glad I was able to put my hand on one more than ever....We knew it was a dying breed but when they are killing the V6, imagine how lucky we are to get a new V8!!
The following 3 users liked this post by wthrman2:
arentz07 (06-01-22), DLPTony (06-01-22), giS (06-01-22)
Old 06-01-22, 05:32 AM
  #273  
Kanpai
Instructor
 
Kanpai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: NJ
Posts: 759
Received 981 Likes on 468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wthrman2
I am sure you guys have seen that the V6 was taken out of the Highlander, now its out of the Lexus RX so we are lucky that they approved dropping the V8 in our IS and I am some glad I was able to put my hand on one more than ever....We knew it was a dying breed but when they are killing the V6, imagine how lucky we are to get a new V8!!

The following users liked this post:
wthrman2 (06-01-22)
Old 06-01-22, 06:27 AM
  #274  
arentz07
drives cars
 
arentz07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: GA
Posts: 8,491
Received 3,805 Likes on 1,930 Posts
Default

Lexus IS 500 F Sport Performance:
  • 5.0 V-8
  • 472 horsepower
  • 391 lb-ft
  • 8-speed auto
  • 0 to 60: low 4-second
Lexus RX 500h F Sport Performance:
  • 2.4 turbo I-4 and hybrid
  • 365 horsepower
  • 406 lb-ft
  • 6-speed auto
  • 0 to 60: high 5-second
I mean I'm not upset that they're offering this now, but the "500" number clearly means nothing.
The following 2 users liked this post by arentz07:
macmaster (06-01-22), wthrman2 (06-01-22)
Old 06-01-22, 06:47 AM
  #275  
macmaster
Pole Position
 
macmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,780
Received 1,957 Likes on 1,048 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arentz07
Lexus IS 500 F Sport Performance:
  • 5.0 V-8
  • 472 horsepower
  • 391 lb-ft
  • 8-speed auto
  • 0 to 60: low 4-second
Lexus RX 500h F Sport Performance:
  • 2.4 turbo I-4 and hybrid
  • 365 horsepower
  • 406 lb-ft
  • 6-speed auto
  • 0 to 60: high 5-second
I mean I'm not upset that they're offering this now, but the "500" number clearly means nothing.
Bingo. Should’ve been called the RX250Th F Sport.

No more boring cars eh Morizo?
Old 06-01-22, 06:50 AM
  #276  
arentz07
drives cars
 
arentz07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: GA
Posts: 8,491
Received 3,805 Likes on 1,930 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 05RollaXRS
I will try to make this as objective as possible..

Considering on paper the power-to-weight ratio is similar between RCF and IS500 (around 8.4 lbs/HP) while the ISF has a power-to-weight ratio is about 9.1 lbs/HP, on paper it favors the RCF or the IS500. However, it is complicated. The reason for that is, the ISF gearing overall is very different due to different wheel/tire circumference (especially for the RCF with the big 275/35/19 rear tires) and also the ~ 600 rpm higher rev range.

The RCF is geared optimally for all-out acceleration while ISF is geared optimally for the 1/4 mile because it shifts from 3rd to 4th much earlier (around 94 mph) than the RCF, which shift from 3rd to 4th about 4 - 5 mph before the 1/4 mile trap (around 110 mph). So, if that 3rd to 4th shift just before the 1/4 mile trap and have not gotten back into the "meat" of the powerband (above 6000 rpm), you easily lose a couple of tenths. An ISF would be more consistently in the "meat' of its powerband because it shifted to 4th long before the 1/4 mile trap. Not sure why Lexus had to make RCF's 3rd gear so damn tall? (it does work much better in long sweeping turns) That is why, in theory it should be close in the 1/4 mile times between an ISF and RCF. Quickest stock RCF achieved has been 12.5 seconds. People have reduced the rear tire pressures down to 27 PSI on the RCF to get the gearing shorten down, which significantly improved 1/4 mile times down to 12.3 seconds.

This video shows what I said above. the ISF and RCF stock for stock, is usually down to the launch up to 80 mph. However, that top end power and longer rev range starts to show up after 80 mph and RCF starts to pull away steadily up to 140 - 150 mph. However, once you put a few bolts on the ISF, it gets very close in a straight line. An ISF with intake/header/exhaust is considered a very close race with an RCF with a full catback exhaust in a straight line.
I wonder what difference the newer 3.13 final drive makes for the RC F compared to the 2.94 it had at its launch? The IS 500 also shares this shorter final drive.
Old 06-01-22, 07:01 AM
  #277  
cajun
Pit Crew
 
cajun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 161
Received 146 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arentz07
Lexus IS 500 F Sport Performance:
  • 5.0 V-8
  • 472 horsepower
  • 391 lb-ft
  • 8-speed auto
  • 0 to 60: low 4-second
Lexus RX 500h F Sport Performance:
  • 2.4 turbo I-4 and hybrid
  • 365 horsepower
  • 406 lb-ft
  • 6-speed auto
  • 0 to 60: high 5-second
I mean I'm not upset that they're offering this now, but the "500" number clearly means nothing.
Agreed. Not certain if the forthcoming RX 500h is worthy of a black F Sport badge.
Old 06-01-22, 07:34 AM
  #278  
tapjoy
Pit Crew
 
tapjoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: ca
Posts: 120
Received 102 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cajun
Agreed. Not certain if the forthcoming RX 500h is worthy of a black F Sport badge.
Or the “500”.
Old 06-01-22, 09:28 AM
  #279  
Moonman89
Advanced
 
Moonman89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: MI
Posts: 565
Received 1,185 Likes on 350 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wthrman2
I am sure you guys have seen that the V6 was taken out of the Highlander, now its out of the Lexus RX so we are lucky that they approved dropping the V8 in our IS and I am some glad I was able to put my hand on one more than ever....We knew it was a dying breed but when they are killing the V6, imagine how lucky we are to get a new V8!!
Back in February I got a brand new 2022 Highlander XLE V6 for msrp. I am glad I got it because I knew 2022 is the last year with the V6.
The following users liked this post:
wthrman2 (06-01-22)
Old 06-01-22, 09:40 AM
  #280  
Kanpai
Instructor
 
Kanpai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: NJ
Posts: 759
Received 981 Likes on 468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arentz07
Lexus IS 500 F Sport Performance:
  • 5.0 V-8
  • 472 horsepower
  • 391 lb-ft
  • 8-speed auto
  • 0 to 60: low 4-second
Lexus RX 500h F Sport Performance:
  • 2.4 turbo I-4 and hybrid
  • 365 horsepower
  • 406 lb-ft
  • 6-speed auto
  • 0 to 60: high 5-second
I mean I'm not upset that they're offering this now, but the "500" number clearly means nothing.
The LS500 exists too, which isn't a V8. Still an odd choice though.
Old 06-01-22, 10:10 AM
  #281  
cp2
Racer
iTrader: (1)
 
cp2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 1,525
Received 369 Likes on 213 Posts
Default

i thought i heard or read somewhere that lexus is going away from the number and engine displacement correlation (ie 2.5L=250, 3.0L=300, 5.0L=500, etc). like the new electrical suv...i think the RZ450? it'll be interesting to see what the numbers mean in the future.
Old 06-01-22, 10:25 AM
  #282  
arentz07
drives cars
 
arentz07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: GA
Posts: 8,491
Received 3,805 Likes on 1,930 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kanpai
The LS500 exists too, which isn't a V8. Still an odd choice though.
I wonder if it's the torque number that they're using to denote the "500". 500 Nm of torque or up?

IS 500: 391 lb-ft | 530 Nm
LS 500: 442 lb-ft | 600 Nm
RX 500h: 406 lb-ft | 550 Nm

Maybe that's not it either. Make it make sense, Lexus!
Old 06-01-22, 12:35 PM
  #283  
Kanpai
Instructor
 
Kanpai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: NJ
Posts: 759
Received 981 Likes on 468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arentz07
I wonder if it's the torque number that they're using to denote the "500". 500 Nm of torque or up?

IS 500: 391 lb-ft | 530 Nm
LS 500: 442 lb-ft | 600 Nm
RX 500h: 406 lb-ft | 550 Nm

Maybe that's not it either. Make it make sense, Lexus!
For a while, it did refer to the engine size in CCs, but that seemed to tail off. May have just ended up being a "trim level" at this point
The following users liked this post:
Carolina50 (06-01-22)
Old 06-01-22, 01:24 PM
  #284  
Renault
Intermediate
 
Renault's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: CA
Posts: 270
Received 282 Likes on 141 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arentz07
I wonder if it's the torque number that they're using to denote the "500". 500 Nm of torque or up?

IS 500: 391 lb-ft | 530 Nm
LS 500: 442 lb-ft | 600 Nm
RX 500h: 406 lb-ft | 550 Nm

Maybe that's not it either. Make it make sense, Lexus!
Maybe not making sense of it is there marketing strategy
Old 06-01-22, 01:36 PM
  #285  
95bat
Racer
 
95bat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 1,894
Received 1,329 Likes on 681 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kanpai
For a while, it did refer to the engine size in CCs, but that seemed to tail off. May have just ended up being a "trim level" at this point
Thats what it is... the top trim level.

I think the RX 500h might be the next car for the wife, replace our current RX 350.
The following users liked this post:
Carolina50 (06-01-22)


Quick Reply: The V8 is back: IS 500 F SPORT Performance. Part 2 2022 Sales & Delivery Discussions



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:23 PM.