Why on earth should I buy an IS-F?
#16
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My personal opinion is that in this buyer's segment, the vast majority of buyers are not going to look at the price as a primary or even defining factor. My roommate is a BMWhead and would never, ever consider a Lexus, so the IS F could be 40k and he wouldn't buy one. I consider both, yet look at other factors - with price being well down the list - in my comparison.
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
From a performance standpoint, the M3 and IS-F are pretty much equals. The performance times are nearly identical all around. Reviews for the M3 coupe and IS-F have been spectacular. Each is a representation from each company.
I think the IS-F brings a different look and a Techno feel to the field. It also will be a "Lexus" high quality, great dealer service, great reliablity.
Also, while I would love either car, the M3 continues to lose its rareness as BMW makes more and more. They will make over 100,000 M3s this generation. We might get 20,000 IS-Fs. So it will be the more rare car.
I can't really dislike either, they are both incredible and the choice is down to personal preference.
I think the IS-F brings a different look and a Techno feel to the field. It also will be a "Lexus" high quality, great dealer service, great reliablity.
Also, while I would love either car, the M3 continues to lose its rareness as BMW makes more and more. They will make over 100,000 M3s this generation. We might get 20,000 IS-Fs. So it will be the more rare car.
I can't really dislike either, they are both incredible and the choice is down to personal preference.
#18
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IS-F is still cheaper...
to get the same amenities you would be paying much much more in terms of options...not to mention the DSG price has yet to be announced...also, with lexus i've never had a problem getting under sticker...way under...with bmw you have to pretty much pin them into submission to move away from msrp even with a regular old 3 series...
to get the same amenities you would be paying much much more in terms of options...not to mention the DSG price has yet to be announced...also, with lexus i've never had a problem getting under sticker...way under...with bmw you have to pretty much pin them into submission to move away from msrp even with a regular old 3 series...
#20
bmw pulled a marketing trick w/ their m3 pricing. if you subtract the 19" wheels, moonroof, leather, paint, ipod jack, electronic stability and of course leave the auto tranny.. you are looking at a possible $49-$50k starting price on the is-f. i also can't imagine anyone that would want to order a stripped down m3 unless it was for pure track purposes. so in reality, you are still saving $10k+ with the is-f along w/ the added reliability and faster performance!
#21
Pole Position
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco & San Luis Obispo
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why I would go M3:
Newer (by 3 years)
German
Coupe (nice to have 2 or 4 door(s) options)
The Gold Standard
Manual tranny
Why I would go IS-F:
Comfort (by a noticeable amount)
Reliability (proven)
More amenities
-------------------
Like someone else said, if I'm going to be spending $60k anyways, I'm not even going to worry about the itsy bitsy options BMW tacks on, but look at the bigger picture. The fact that getting a M coupe w/ a manual tranny is enough reason for most.
While the IS-F may be more comfortable w/ more amenities, it's going to get hammered by reviews that it's being too controlled by the computer and its dating interior. The "fun" factor is gonna play such a huge part with cars in this price range that, with whatever the IS-F has going for it is going to get overshadowed quite a bit by the new kid on the block. Most importantly, where's thhe manual!?!?!?!?!?!?
Newer (by 3 years)
German
Coupe (nice to have 2 or 4 door(s) options)
The Gold Standard
Manual tranny
Why I would go IS-F:
Comfort (by a noticeable amount)
Reliability (proven)
More amenities
-------------------
Like someone else said, if I'm going to be spending $60k anyways, I'm not even going to worry about the itsy bitsy options BMW tacks on, but look at the bigger picture. The fact that getting a M coupe w/ a manual tranny is enough reason for most.
While the IS-F may be more comfortable w/ more amenities, it's going to get hammered by reviews that it's being too controlled by the computer and its dating interior. The "fun" factor is gonna play such a huge part with cars in this price range that, with whatever the IS-F has going for it is going to get overshadowed quite a bit by the new kid on the block. Most importantly, where's thhe manual!?!?!?!?!?!?
#22
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
when a 8 speed tranny that comes standard has better shift times (.1 sec, throttle blips) than an enzo why would you want a manual. Ive driven manual for a good number of years and I dont really see the point anymore if you are concerned about true performance. One can calculate derivatives by hand but in the end you still use a calculator
Did you even look at the review sticky to see what mags/sites think, if you think a IS-F interior is dated id suggest you dont look at a 3 interior. BTW you can totally disable the traction control in the F.
Dont forget 1700 for gas guzzler most mags are predicting, base price is going to be irrelevant for some time because of "market adjustment fees"
Did you even look at the review sticky to see what mags/sites think, if you think a IS-F interior is dated id suggest you dont look at a 3 interior. BTW you can totally disable the traction control in the F.
Dont forget 1700 for gas guzzler most mags are predicting, base price is going to be irrelevant for some time because of "market adjustment fees"
#23
Pole Position
when a 8 speed tranny that comes standard has better shift times (.1 sec, throttle blips) than an enzo why would you want a manual. Ive driven manual for a good number of years and I dont really see the point anymore if you are concerned about true performance. One can calculate derivatives by hand but in the end you still use a calculator
To me, executing a good rev matched, heal/toe downshift is one of the greatest thrills of driving a good sports car. I am not Schuie and I never will be. I don't race at stop lights. So I couldn't care less that the guy next to me with his flappy gear box/tiptronic/DSC/whatchamanamit gearbox is 0.2 seconds quicker to 60 without any effort than I am. I care that driving well with a proper manual gearbox takes skill and effort.
To paraphrase a well known bumper sticker: "They can take my manual tranny from my cold, dead hands"
#24
Because for many of us, there's a lot more to driving that times in a magazine or time slips at the track.
To me, executing a good rev matched, heal/toe downshift is one of the greatest thrills of driving a good sports car. I am not Schuie and I never will be. I don't race at stop lights. So I couldn't care less that the guy next to me with his flappy gear box/tiptronic/DSC/whatchamanamit gearbox is 0.2 seconds quicker to 60 without any effort than I am. I care that driving well with a proper manual gearbox takes skill and effort.
To paraphrase a well known bumper sticker: "They can take my manual tranny from my cold, dead hands"
To me, executing a good rev matched, heal/toe downshift is one of the greatest thrills of driving a good sports car. I am not Schuie and I never will be. I don't race at stop lights. So I couldn't care less that the guy next to me with his flappy gear box/tiptronic/DSC/whatchamanamit gearbox is 0.2 seconds quicker to 60 without any effort than I am. I care that driving well with a proper manual gearbox takes skill and effort.
To paraphrase a well known bumper sticker: "They can take my manual tranny from my cold, dead hands"
A manual driver has to work his 2 feet with 3 pedals all at the same time while 1 hand on steering wheel and the other for shifting yet perfecting the entry and exit... that takes skill.
an auto driver... 2 hands firmly on the steering wheel, blip paddle to downshift.. how exicting is that? that is like NASCAR drivers turning left all day long.
Last edited by newr; 01-15-08 at 12:25 PM.
#25
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
I personally think $15k more than the IS350 is a bargain. The transmission and engine alone is worth that price. You get a 5.0L V8 instead of a 3.5L V6. That spells out more torque all across the board. The transmission is a gem though, with it's quick blimp of the throttle and shifting. You wont get that in an IS350.
#26
Lexus Test Driver
#28
I wanted to quote this for perpetuity, just because I love how people have to invent artificial hardship in order to attempt to distinguish themselves from others or look down on them. I mean, gosh, real men and skilled drivers use cars that don't have power steering, leather seats, speakers, A/C, or windshields. Obviously.
btw, there is a name for those real men/women who drive cars that don't have power steering, leather seats, speakers, A/C, or windshields... it's called RACERS.
#29
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
I wanted to quote this for perpetuity, just because I love how people have to invent artificial hardship in order to attempt to distinguish themselves from others or look down on them. I mean, gosh, real men and skilled drivers use cars that don't have power steering, leather seats, speakers, A/C, or windshields. Obviously.
#30
Lexus Test Driver
There was none from what I quoted.
All of whom, notably, also use clutchless transmissions in the highest levels of professional racing. What was your point again?
Exactly my point. These are all simply technological advances, many of which improve performance. I have no problem with people who prefer manuals; in fact, I give and have always given tremendous respect to BMW for offering manual transmissions across their product line. However, artificially inducing technologically-inferior equipment in order to distinguish one's own skill is laughable.
This is not even getting into the fact that one of the people I quoted above said in another thread that the M3 EDC is a "must-have" option and would get it on his vehicle.
the funny thing is people wont complain when they utilize launch control, ABS, traction control, some advanced power splitting AWD system, yet people get all bent out of shape on the topic of being a real man and driving manuals. Its all the same damn thing utilizing a piece of technology to gain an advantage
This is not even getting into the fact that one of the people I quoted above said in another thread that the M3 EDC is a "must-have" option and would get it on his vehicle.
Last edited by gengar; 01-15-08 at 03:45 PM.