photomaker

To all of you who either own or have seen an Ultrasonic Blue ISF in person, which of these two photos best represents the ACTUAL color of the Blue ISF? I'm asking because I am very colorblind and just found these two pics taken the day I picked mine up...one processed from the .jpg (the first pic) file and the other is processed from my RAW (Canon 20D, 2nd pic) file. I just thought it was interesting how different these shades of blue are...and they are both the same photo...

Besides a little USM (sharpening), I didn't touch the colors/levels/exposure at all. I can provide more examples (each pic I take is RAW+JPG), but this is the only photo I have that I had already processed both the RAW and JPG.

JPG:


RAW:

flipside909

It's a very tough color to capture. Looks better in RAW format.

Here's a pic I took back at the Press Event at Laguna Seca last year:

flipside909

And here's one I took in Detroit at the IS-F World Premier back in Jan 2007 under convention center lighting...

chikken

I'm just not a big fan of blue, you should see it person....ohhhh those swirl marks just make it look cheap

rominl

iTrader: (4)

photomaker happens to be owner of an ultrasonic blue is-f.

swirls make it look cheap? almost every car is cheap out there then? unless you literally don't drive a car, otherwise swirls are almost inevitable

CrazyMPG

iTrader: (4)

heh...which cars don't have swirl marks?