IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

IS-F Brakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-08, 09:56 PM
  #46  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lance scares me sometimes b/c he's too good
Old 04-26-08, 10:34 PM
  #47  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,671
Received 190 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

yes, that's the diagram i read showing the rotors aren't directional at all`
Old 04-27-08, 09:21 AM
  #48  
Joe Z
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joe Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Under an IS F since 2008
Posts: 13,441
Received 1,063 Likes on 586 Posts
Lightbulb

Great picture Lance... tks!!

This finalizes that there is not going to be a performance issue here.. with the rotor holes or vanes...

However, IMHO it would have been just as easy for the Lexus IS-F design team to make sure while they are trying to appeal to market studies, to make sure the holes are aesthetically pleasing and following industry standard...

Since they made and assigned 4 different wheel part numbers, the rotors would have been just as easy....


Joe Z
Old 04-27-08, 03:48 PM
  #49  
RX Renesis
Driver School Candidate
 
RX Renesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: B.C.
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i say they simply should've just slotted the rotors instead of drilled...
Old 04-28-08, 11:36 PM
  #50  
t0e
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
t0e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cali4nication-LosAngeles
Posts: 3,494
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rominl

look at the prices for the is-f brakes and the fsport brakes, and see how much more expensive f sport is. f sport has directional (from what i know), 2 piece rotors. if instead of 61k, people see 63k on the is-f, that wouldn't look good right? (as if we don't have enough people saying the is-f is too expensive)
Originally Posted by lobuxracer
Lexus went way beyond what is necessary for good brakes on the IS-F. Also, the discs are fundamentally different from the IS350 - the vane type (see below) is completely different, and therefore no directionality is necessary. Personally, I think they'd have done us all a favor if they'd left out the cosmetic holes, but they're trying to appeal to their market studies which show ordinary people still believe drilled looks better and performs better (despite practical experience in motorsports indicating exactly the opposite.)
Originally Posted by RX Renesis
i say they simply should've just slotted the rotors instead of drilled...
All of the above ^^^

But, I also believe that with any 1 piece rotor, heavy use on the track will defiantly warp the rotor to some degree.

Thats why free floating rotors, are just more expensive.

But, how many of us, go down the street at 200+ and have to stop on a dime for a 90 degree turn, 50 times in one day?
Old 04-29-08, 12:53 AM
  #51  
CrazyMPG
Phat Monkey
iTrader: (4)
 
CrazyMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 3,339
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by t0e
But, how many of us, go down the street at 200+ and have to stop on a dime for a 90 degree turn, 50 times in one day?

I don't know about you...but that's daily driving for me...gotta dodge all these slow drivers....haha lol jp
Old 05-11-08, 10:11 PM
  #52  
Joe Z
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joe Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Under an IS F since 2008
Posts: 13,441
Received 1,063 Likes on 586 Posts
Default

Here is the diagram & picture that just resurfaced.. (for the record)

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
superYaris
Suspension and Brakes
109
02-10-16 01:45 PM
nikogio38
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
0
06-14-15 11:23 PM
R6_Dude
Suspension and Brakes
8
07-30-09 09:14 PM
MSMLexIS
IS F (2008-2014)
1
01-26-08 04:09 PM



Quick Reply: IS-F Brakes



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:35 AM.