IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

Tokyo Giants: GTR vss EVO vs IS-F

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-08, 09:33 AM
  #1  
sizquik
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
sizquik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Tokyo Giants: GTR vss EVO vs IS-F

http://windingroad.nextautos.com/win...1web/?folio=42
Old 09-18-08, 09:55 AM
  #2  
primecut
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
primecut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice article.. thanks. But what happened to the 0-60 times for the F? Did they just use Lexus's estimate or they didn't launch? That's the slowest time I've seen.. slower than the Evo.. ha ha
Old 09-18-08, 10:53 AM
  #3  
timeToy
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (11)
 
timeToy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yes, it is a nice article, kinda like a travel dairy, sad it lacks any valuable information regarding the cars it featured...

The real world price difference between the IS-F and GT-R is not quite what they are talking about, let's check:

'09 IS-F: MSRP= 56,610 + 4,010 (ML) - 6,000 (rebate everyone has lately) = 54,620 before tax and reg
'09 GT-R: MSPR= 79,090 + 20,000 (Dealer markup) = 99,090 before tax and reg

Quite a big difference, the GT-R do not turn out to be the performance bargain it is hyp'ed to be.
Old 09-18-08, 11:07 AM
  #4  
CrazyMPG
Phat Monkey
iTrader: (4)
 
CrazyMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 3,339
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by timeToy
Yes, it is a nice article, kinda like a travel dairy, sad it lacks any valuable information regarding the cars it featured...

The real world price difference between the IS-F and GT-R is not quite what they are talking about, let's check:

'09 IS-F: MSRP= 56,610 + 4,010 (ML) - 6,000 (rebate everyone has lately) = 54,620 before tax and reg
'09 GT-R: MSPR= 79,090 + 20,000 (Dealer markup) = 99,090 before tax and reg

Quite a big difference, the GT-R do not turn out to be the performance bargain it is hyp'ed to be.

I think they were basing it on Japan's price for the cars between the two...which is not that much of a difference....USA costs are a different story.....
Old 09-18-08, 11:28 AM
  #5  
UZ214
Pole Position
 
UZ214's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: DE
Posts: 2,661
Received 221 Likes on 163 Posts
Default

The GTR looks hot, interior another story, i hope the isf is faster then the new evo..
Originally Posted by CrazyMPG
I think they were basing it on Japan's price for the cars between the two...which is not that much of a difference....USA costs are a different story.....
Old 09-18-08, 12:13 PM
  #6  
newzfirst
Driver School Candidate
 
newzfirst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Damn, that price for the GT-R would keep me out of that dealer. I would rather pick up a maserati or aston martin.
Old 09-18-08, 04:42 PM
  #7  
BigMikeISF
Lexus Champion
 
BigMikeISF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Nice article!! I like how it says the F was the smoothest ride

Originally Posted by primecut
Nice article.. thanks. But what happened to the 0-60 times for the F? Did they just use Lexus's estimate or they didn't launch? That's the slowest time I've seen.. slower than the Evo.. ha ha
That is quite low, who knows how they got it
Old 09-18-08, 06:30 PM
  #8  
huddleston
Racer
iTrader: (3)
 
huddleston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: AR
Posts: 1,801
Likes: 0
Received 56 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

interesting article - good find.
Old 09-18-08, 07:15 PM
  #9  
sizquik
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
sizquik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by primecut
Nice article.. thanks. But what happened to the 0-60 times for the F? Did they just use Lexus's estimate or they didn't launch? That's the slowest time I've seen.. slower than the Evo.. ha ha
Hard to say. Most likely they just used Lexus' estimate – it didn't seem like they did serious testing..
Old 09-19-08, 12:21 AM
  #10  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I am shocked b/c that EXACT SAME ARTICLE was published in the euro mag CAR a few months ago.

Its somewhere in my stash....I gotta go through em.
Old 09-19-08, 05:51 AM
  #11  
anajri
Driver
 
anajri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: International
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by timeToy
Yes, it is a nice article, kinda like a travel dairy, sad it lacks any valuable information regarding the cars it featured...

The real world price difference between the IS-F and GT-R is not quite what they are talking about, let's check:

'09 IS-F: MSRP= 56,610 + 4,010 (ML) - 6,000 (rebate everyone has lately) = 54,620 before tax and reg
'09 GT-R: MSPR= 79,090 + 20,000 (Dealer markup) = 99,090 before tax and reg

Quite a big difference, the GT-R do not turn out to be the performance bargain it is hyp'ed to be.
dont forget the 7,000 dollars price hike nissan anounced a few days back
Old 09-19-08, 11:44 AM
  #12  
sizquik
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
sizquik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
I am shocked b/c that EXACT SAME ARTICLE was published in the euro mag CAR a few months ago.

Its somewhere in my stash....I gotta go through em.
That is too funny but doesn't surprise me. Maybe they are both owned by the same publisher, etc.?
Old 09-19-08, 05:47 PM
  #13  
GFerg
Speaks French in Russian

 
GFerg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: What is G?
Posts: 13,300
Received 65 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
I am shocked b/c that EXACT SAME ARTICLE was published in the euro mag CAR a few months ago.

Its somewhere in my stash....I gotta go through em.
Not shocking at all really. Happens very often. Road and Track had a shootout earlier this year with I believe the GT3, Scuderia, and Gallardo SL that was from an Italian magazine. Automobile and a few others have done the same thing as well in the past.
Old 09-19-08, 10:30 PM
  #14  
TherealFIG
Driver
 
TherealFIG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The GTR has a certain appeal, but it is not for me. Nissan's interpretation of style continues to drift further and further from my own. bulging lines, ackward head lights....it just does not flow like the F does.

Looking at the three the F has an obvious maturity about it. Performance and luxury in one package.

thanks for the read
Old 09-22-08, 08:44 AM
  #15  
dojoman
Lead Lap
iTrader: (5)
 
dojoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,906
Received 270 Likes on 217 Posts
Default

I just saw a GTR on the road, I didn't even know it's already out. Anyway, it looks much better in person. Definitely head turner and side vents are a lot more aggressive.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dLad
IS F (2008-2014)
93
11-12-13 06:04 PM
BULLIT
IS F (2008-2014)
17
12-26-12 09:02 AM
RspSupra
IS F (2008-2014)
67
10-16-09 11:02 PM
LEXUSF
IS F (2008-2014)
46
01-03-09 06:43 PM
Kan-O-Z
IS F (2008-2014)
89
01-18-08 01:27 PM



Quick Reply: Tokyo Giants: GTR vss EVO vs IS-F



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:43 AM.