MHP ECU/TCU Thread (updated with v1 gains: Graphs/Spreadsheet Breakdown)
01-26-09, 02:42 PM
#722
Driver
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01-28-09, 08:08 AM
#731
Pole Position
Data directly from the Winpep7 printout:
rwhp = 351.41
rwtq = 336.25
Temp = 66.94 deg F
Humidity = 31%
Correction Factor = 0.99
I do not know what the calculated relationship is between "STD" and "SAE"
Pat
rwhp = 351.41
rwtq = 336.25
Temp = 66.94 deg F
Humidity = 31%
Correction Factor = 0.99
I do not know what the calculated relationship is between "STD" and "SAE"
Pat
01-28-09, 08:50 AM
#732
Pole Position
Tundra
Peter,
I think that the 341 rwhp you were remembering was the 4th gear run on the Tundra that was truncated at 5,200 rpm by the speed limiter. That run yeilded 341.63 hp for Mike's Tundra with v1 tune.
Pat
I think that the 341 rwhp you were remembering was the 4th gear run on the Tundra that was truncated at 5,200 rpm by the speed limiter. That run yeilded 341.63 hp for Mike's Tundra with v1 tune.
Pat
01-28-09, 09:26 AM
#733
Sorry this is off topic, but it keeps the MHP thread on top! 
Pat, STD is an inflated correction factor that NO ONE uses unless their goal is to inflate their dyno numbers. I believe you are referring to this STD graph of yours (not the Tundra's):
Here is that SAME dyno pull using the accurate SAE correction factor:
...and lastly, for reference, here is my 371 rwhp using the inflated STD correction factor:
Pat, STD is an inflated correction factor that NO ONE uses unless their goal is to inflate their dyno numbers. I believe you are referring to this STD graph of yours (not the Tundra's):
Here is that SAME dyno pull using the accurate SAE correction factor:
...and lastly, for reference, here is my 371 rwhp using the inflated STD correction factor:
