slowIST

iTrader: (4)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPjoAowEGOk

This is a vid of my car on a dyno dynamics. 317.5 rwhp and 307.05 rwtq., 91 octane.
To put into perspective, a new m3 with primary cat delete and everything else stock made 315.2rwhp and 229.36rwtq on the same dyno. I wanna remove my primary cats too now. Haha. More info on the gintani built/chippped m3 and his low reading dyno can be googled.

slowIST

iTrader: (4)

P.S., I do not know what gear it was dyno'd in and if it was SAE corrected. I was not there.. work sucks. Man nurse= murse ftw.

flowrider

iTrader: (9)

Then a woman nurse is a wurse

Lou

slowIST

iTrader: (4)

Yes. They are wurse. Heh

caymandive

iTrader: (2)

So no previous baseline to compare the difference the exhaust made?

ISF-88

I'm getting my IS-F baselined tmr on a Dyno Dynamics too. I will post how much power I make here in my crappy +3700 ft elevation city then dyno again with the Joe Z exhaust to see the gains. It won't be much as Dyno Dynamics read alot lower numbers then Dyno Jets. But Dyno Dynamics reads more accurately then inflated dynojet numbers.

slowIST

iTrader: (4)

to caymandive: Unfortunately not =/

I just posted for everyone to be able to hear the car on the dyno i guess. If anyone has any ideas of how much lower the dyno dynamics reads (i know it's all opinionated anyway) please let me know. My brothers car (c63) is at the exhaust shop now. Baseline is scheduled for today. True dual 3 inch piping to be made during the week. Re dyno next week. All dyno runs will be on the dyno dynamic i was on.

How much do you think the primary cats bottle neck an m3's exhaust? I'm really thinking of doing a primary cat delete.