IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

The IS-F need a hp jump?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-09 | 07:36 PM
  #31  
Dave600hL's Avatar
Dave600hL
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,448
Likes: 2
From: Japan
Default

Originally Posted by felixcat
I never said hp is the only factor to consider a ISF, I just said it would be better that Lexus reacts to the trend more quickly. hp is not everything, but it does mean something. Think about that if the current ISF only have 330hp, do your guys still want a F?
All these what if's... If the IS-F had 330hp then people would take that into account when choosing that car the way it is. But I know for a fact it would not be the price of what the actuall "F" is and on top of that it would then probably drop back into the IS350/BMW 3 series class and people who are in the market for RS4/C63/M3 class would overlook it wouldn't they? So what are you trying to prove with this statement?

Originally Posted by felixcat
Also, if you citing other supercars that do not have super high hp, the reason behind this is the cost to manufacture and market strategy. It's pity that M3 only put a 4L V8 in it because BMW management decided to use a NA engine, and they decided to put the 5L V10 in the higher M5/6, and they don't have bigger and better engine if M3 use 5L and M5/6 use something >5L.
Again what is your point? Do you think that the RS4/C63/M3/IS-F should all have 700 hp?

Originally Posted by felixcat
Yes I know if I come to a specific car forum and say 'hey guys I found that some other brands' product are superior to yours in one specification', the reaction of some ppl will normally be some curse and quarrel. But please do not forget, this defensive way and ignorance are exactly how the big 3 ruin themselves over years.
See, your problem is that you are assuming that IS-F owners are concerned that the other rival cars are superior to the IS-F. That could not be father from the truth, we all choose our cars knowing exactly were its strengths and short commings were, and I speak for myself here, I am in no way concerned that the C63 makes more power and torque than the "F". You need to adjust your attitude the realise the fact that why some people here are not taking your post seriously is b/c no one really cares that "X" car has more power, so I will say again that in my case the car was bought for the entire package. So picking only on its de-merits will get you no where.

Originally Posted by felixcat
No offense, from psychological aspect, it's known that one who is easy to feel/consider himself being insulted, is normally the one that lack of self confidence and ambition in his subconsciousness.

Like what I have said above, I have mentioned *many many* times, I am not comparing car A with car B. I just talk about the engine. Why I still see claims from someone such as 'you are comparing a very sophisticated car to a no brainer muscle car'?? How many times do I need to repeat this?
You are saying people are getting all upset and insulted b/c of lack of self confidence? Sigh ... Please stop assuming what people are thinking, you questions and statements are the reason you are getting the answers you are.

Originally Posted by felixcat
Suppose we are development/design engineers in Toyota corp, now comes the project from upper management that asking us to start on 2010 year model IS-F, and they have already approved a slight/mid facelift to the product, but need us to specify what things to be changed; so one of the discussion topic in the development plan is to decide what engine should we use in the new product. Of course there are many options, for example: no change and keep the same one, put more fancy stuff in the 5.7L one to make like 450-500hp+, or ask the engine dept. to develop a dedicated new one etc. Under such circumstances, what are your guys' suggestions?
Keep the same engine as it is,it is bullet proof from what I have seen and make the car more luxurious all the while reducing weight without sacrifice to saftey and do more research of the suspension to improve handling and ride confort.
Old 06-03-09 | 07:36 PM
  #32  
felixcat's Avatar
felixcat
Thread Starter
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 188
Likes: 37
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by IS-Fly168
Yeah, make sure you compare the navi screens too, see which one is clearer,,, oh wait, someones camaro dont even have navi as an option. My bad
You remind me on thing, actually it's a question: does the Bugatti Veyron has navigation as an option?

Now please do not consider I am comparing car A to car B again. I just say navigation !=> luxury, and also luxury !=> navigation.
Old 06-03-09 | 07:37 PM
  #33  
IS-Fly168's Avatar
IS-Fly168
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: pa
Default

Originally Posted by felixcat
No offense, from psychological aspect, it's known that one who is easy to feel/consider himself being insulted, is normally the one that lack of self confidence and ambition in his subconsciousness.

Like what I have said above, I have mentioned *many many* times, I am not comparing car A with car B. I just talk about the engine. Why I still see claims from someone such as 'you are comparing a very sophisticated car to a no brainer muscle car'?? How many times do I need to repeat this?
Hmm, cause you started this topic saying the IsF needs more Hp, saying our $50k car has basically the same Hp as a $28k camaro, wtf do you want us to think? of course we are going to assume this idiots trying to compare the speed of the isF to the very bang for the buck 400+hp camaro. I feel insulted not cause im lacking confidence, I feel insulted cause you are using a camaro as an example against our car. Not to sound conceited, but the camaro is a pos to me, by comparing a camaro to the isf, is almost like those idiots with the new Hyundai Genesis comparing it to the Mercedes S550. Im pretty sure most if not all Mercedes S class owner gonna feel insulted too.
Old 06-03-09 | 07:55 PM
  #34  
VSL-F's Avatar
VSL-F
Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Default

HP numbers won't mean much in 10 years anyway. The way things are going we will all be driving electric cars anyway!
Old 06-03-09 | 08:14 PM
  #35  
denut-L's Avatar
denut-L
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
From: mN
Default

Originally Posted by IS-Fly168
Hmm, cause you started this topic saying the IsF needs more Hp, saying our $50k car has basically the same Hp as a $28k camaro, wtf do you want us to think? of course we are going to assume this idiots trying to compare the speed of the isF to the very bang for the buck 400+hp camaro. I feel insulted not cause im lacking confidence, I feel insulted cause you are using a camaro as an example against our car. Not to sound conceited, but the camaro is a pos to me, by comparing a camaro to the isf, is almost like those idiots with the new Hyundai Genesis comparing it to the Mercedes S550. Im pretty sure most if not all Mercedes S class owner gonna feel insulted too.

even tho i don't own one.
Old 06-03-09 | 08:21 PM
  #36  
felixcat's Avatar
felixcat
Thread Starter
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 188
Likes: 37
From: CA
Default

First, for good will please promise me, do not get angry while reading the following replies. I am not pointing at any specific person.


Originally Posted by Dave600hL
All these what if's... If the IS-F had 330hp then people would take that into account when choosing that car the way it is. But I know for a fact it would not be the price of what the actuall "F" is and on top of that it would then probably drop back into the IS350/BMW 3 series class and people who are in the market for RS4/C63/M3 class would overlook it wouldn't they? So what are you trying to prove with this statement?
Dave, I'm not proving anything, they are all facts that no need to prove. What I try to convey is: for the current stage F, it's still not in the level like AM, Lambo, Bentley, RR etc. that no need to seriously caring much about HP. You must admit that, price tells everything.

Originally Posted by Dave600hL
Again what is your point? Do you think that the RS4/C63/M3/IS-F should all have 700 hp?
Yes, for the current stage, a 500hp+ engine is better choice. For premium sports cars with MSRP in $50k - $90k, always keep at least 100hp higher than the $30k range sports car. My personal suggestion.

Originally Posted by Dave600hL
See, your problem is that you are assuming that IS-F owners are concerned that the other rival cars are superior to the IS-F. That could not be father from the truth, we all choose our cars knowing exactly were its strengths and short commings were, and I speak for myself here, I am in no way concerned that the C63 makes more power and torque than the "F". You need to adjust your attitude the realise the fact that why some people here are not taking your post seriously is b/c no one really cares that "X" car has more power, so I will say again that in my case the car was bought for the entire package. So picking only on its de-merits will get you no where.
I have *never* written any sentence like 'IS-F owners are XXXXX', I just said 'someone xxxxxx', if I remember correctly, currently there is no law saying that if I write a post in car A forum, then the word 'someone' automatically = car A owners. Right? At least, not everyone that browses/writes this subforum need to be owning a F. Right? 'someone' is a generic word, it does not mean any specific person or group. If you feel I am pointing at a specific group, that's only your problem, not mine.

BTW, why do I have an 'attitude'? I don't have an attitude. You know me better than I am?

Originally Posted by Dave600hL
You are saying people are getting all upset and insulted b/c of lack of self confidence? Sigh ... Please stop assuming what people are thinking, you questions and statements are the reason you are getting the answers you are.
Again, I am not saying exactly who is belong to what I described.

Just think about: when you throw a small rock, if it hit nothing then there is no feedback; if it hit something, then you will get feedback. The more feedback generated, the bigger hit it gives. Therefore I am quite happy to see so many feedback.

If someone wrote millions of posts saying one sentence again and again 'the earth is flat', guess what will I do? - I don't care, I don't even bother to look at them.

Originally Posted by Dave600hL
Keep the same engine as it is,it is bullet proof from what I have seen and make the car more luxurious all the while reducing weight without sacrifice to saftey and do more research of the suspension to improve handling and ride confort.
That's a safe option. Let's induce the discussion into more technical topics, instead of quarrel. For example, I am wondering why the 2UR-GSE need 5L displacement to generate 416hp, but the S65B40 only need 4L displacement to generate 414hp? yes I know the former has higher torque, is it because to tune for a higher torque, we give in the hp?
Old 06-03-09 | 08:44 PM
  #37  
PHXF's Avatar
PHXF
Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 190
Likes: 1
From: AZ
Default

seriously... is it the same guy on every forum I read, with a different user name?
Old 06-03-09 | 08:44 PM
  #38  
felixcat's Avatar
felixcat
Thread Starter
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 188
Likes: 37
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by IS-Fly168
Hmm, cause you started this topic saying the IsF needs more Hp, saying our $50k car has basically the same Hp as a $28k camaro, wtf do you want us to think? of course we are going to assume this idiots trying to compare the speed of the isF to the very bang for the buck 400+hp camaro. I feel insulted not cause im lacking confidence, I feel insulted cause you are using a camaro as an example against our car. Not to sound conceited, but the camaro is a pos to me, by comparing a camaro to the isf, is almost like those idiots with the new Hyundai Genesis comparing it to the Mercedes S550. Im pretty sure most if not all Mercedes S class owner gonna feel insulted too.
Hey man, calm down! Technically I can't 'want you to think' anything, cauz I can't control your mind. I just asked if the ISF need a hp bump, you only need to say yes or no if you want to answer. All anger you generated is from yourself. The internet is virtual, you can't see me, I can't see you, you don't know who I am, I don't know who are you either; Reading the post, no one convince any one, no one lose any money, no one lose any property, no one lose his job, his real life unchanged. See my friend, all things around you unchanged, why you feel insulted and angry?

Man, car is just a car, no need to let yourself get angry just because a car, car is not your life; you, yourself are truly your life. It's been proven that keeping a peaceful mind, control temper will be very beneficial to human's health.
Old 06-03-09 | 08:58 PM
  #39  
felixcat's Avatar
felixcat
Thread Starter
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 188
Likes: 37
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by IS-Fly168
Hmm, cause you started this topic saying the IsF needs more Hp, saying our $50k car has basically the same Hp as a $28k camaro, wtf do you want us to think?
Actually, the Camaro SS engine generate more peak HP, and way more peak torque than the F's engine, it's SAE certified, or else you can sue GM to get $$$ back.

See, you are angry because 'our $50k car has basically the same Hp as a $28k camaro'. This is the sentence you wrote here, catch ya.
Old 06-03-09 | 08:58 PM
  #40  
geneva's Avatar
geneva
Rookie
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default

you guys have just confirmed why I recently gave up posting any new topics on this forum! This is suppose to be an outlet for IS-F enthusiasts who enjoy interacting with others that share a common interest. Not to be a source for confrontation and controversy. Now take a deep breath, ahhhh. Do you feel better now? Cheers
Old 06-03-09 | 09:07 PM
  #41  
CDNROCKIES's Avatar
CDNROCKIES
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 1
From: Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by felixcat
Yes, for the current stage, a 500hp+ engine is better choice. For premium sports cars with MSRP in $50k - $90k, always keep at least 100hp higher than the $30k range sports car. My personal suggestion.
The most retarded comment in the gheyest thread ever to make the F forum.

You clearly have no idea what you're talking about in regards to cars of this level. We already know that you don't own one, but you've probably never driven one of the super sedans either.

What a complete waste of thread space!
Old 06-03-09 | 09:11 PM
  #42  
Dave600hL's Avatar
Dave600hL
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,448
Likes: 2
From: Japan
Default

Originally Posted by felixcat
I have *never* written any sentence like 'IS-F owners are XXXXX', I just said 'someone xxxxxx', if I remember correctly, currently there is no law saying that if I write a post in car A forum, then the word 'someone' automatically = car A owners. Right? At least, not everyone that browses/writes this subforum need to be owning a F. Right? 'someone' is a generic word, it does not mean any specific person or group. If you feel I am pointing at a specific group, that's only your problem, not mine.
Oh **** , don't I feel stupid... You come to an IS-F forum, talk about HP numbers on an IS-F, get replies from people who own IS-F's, then talk about peoples subconscious inferiority complex of rival brands and you want me to think what exactly? Oh ,thats right you must have been talking about "other" people.
Here are your words, read them carefully in the context of the thread.
Originally Posted by felixcat
Well, obviously some ppl here are over sensitive and very easy to get angry.

I never said hp is the only factor to consider a ISF, I just said it would be better that Lexus reacts to the trend more quickly. hp is not everything, but it does mean something. Think about that if the current ISF only have 330hp, do your guys still want a F?

..............................................

Yes I know if I come to a specific car forum and say 'hey guys I found that some other brands' product are superior to yours in one specification', the reaction of some ppl will normally be some curse and quarrel. But please do not forget, this defensive way and ignorance are exactly how the big 3 ruin themselves over years.

..............................................
No offense, from psychological aspect, it's known that one who is easy to feel/consider himself being insulted, is normally the one that lack of self confidence and ambition in his subconscious in.
Originally Posted by felixcat
BTW, why do I have an 'attitude'? I don't have an attitude. You know me better than I am?
I didn't say you have an attitude, I said you need to adjust yours to understand that a lot of owners did not choose the IS-F on HP numbers alone. Comprehension is your friend.





Originally Posted by felixcat
Dave, I'm not proving anything, they are all facts that no need to prove. What I try to convey is: for the current stage F, it's still not in the level like AM, Lambo, Bentley, RR etc. that no need to seriously caring much about HP. You must admit that, price tells everything.
Again , I am lost as to why you would put AM, Lambo, Bentley, RR in a sentence as if they were on the same level. You are confused, clearly.



Originally Posted by felixcat
Yes, for the current stage, a 500hp+ engine is better choice. For premium sports cars with MSRP in $50k - $90k, always keep at least 100hp higher than the $30k range sports car. My personal suggestion.
A $90K car does have more than 100hp than a $30K sports car. What is you point again? Oh, btw, $50K and $90K is a big difference in money on what type of car you can get, so why would you throw out numbers like that?









Originally Posted by felixcat
Just think about: when you throw a small rock, if it hit nothing then there is no feedback; if it hit something, then you will get feedback. The more feedback generated, the bigger hit it gives. Therefore I am quite happy to see so many feedback.

If someone wrote millions of posts saying one sentence again and again 'the earth is flat', guess what will I do? - I don't care, I don't even bother to look at them.
So are you trying to induce a flame war? There are ways to go about what you want to know...
Old 06-03-09 | 09:15 PM
  #43  
lobuxracer's Avatar
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 22,491
Likes: 4,121
From: Georgia
Default

And with that, I think we're done here. Let's not do this again.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jkeifer3
IS F (2008-2014)
71
10-13-15 04:07 AM
max90034
IS F (2008-2014)
196
05-02-13 07:47 PM
daniel3ooo
IS F (2008-2014)
18
12-28-12 10:12 PM
CrzKush
IS F (2008-2014)
30
11-03-11 08:27 PM
Perryz
IS F (2008-2014)
45
07-21-11 12:47 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:24 AM.