[Maintenance] Would love to buy one, but...
#1
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[Maintenance] Would love to buy one, but...
I'm looking to finally upgrade from my old school sc400 to a IS-F, and after talking to some folks, I've heard that the maintenance costs are ungodly.
In particular, I'm told brake pads, rotors, tires have very short lives, and are very expensive (e.g., rotors and brake pads have to be changed at the same time and cost around $3,100).
Are maintenance costs and their frequency killing you guys? Please say no because I really want this car...
In particular, I'm told brake pads, rotors, tires have very short lives, and are very expensive (e.g., rotors and brake pads have to be changed at the same time and cost around $3,100).
Are maintenance costs and their frequency killing you guys? Please say no because I really want this car...
#2
Tech Info Resource
iTrader: (2)
The brakes are expensive. They last as long as you know how to use them. Some have killed them quickly, others have not.
Tires are a 25 - 30k mile expense. Par for the course. I have the same life expectancy with my Supra.
Click here for the thread you would have found using search and "maintenance costs"
Tires are a 25 - 30k mile expense. Par for the course. I have the same life expectancy with my Supra.
Click here for the thread you would have found using search and "maintenance costs"
#3
Maintenance costs are expensive for all high performing vehicles, but the IS F doesn't appear to have too much regular maintenance outside of the oil changes. Brake pads and rotors, as well as tires, shouldn't have to be changed all that often if it's not being tracked. As lobuxracer mentioned, the tires should last a good 25-30,000 miles, although some here on the forums have posted much less tread life. As for pads, there are some quality alternatives that reduce the brake dust and I think a few are on or close to par as the OEM brake pads. But don't let these be the only reason to not jump into an F. It's a great ride and a great quality vehicle. Were there any other vehicles you were considering?
#5
I'm still working down my 6 free oil changes, haven't changed tires, rotors or pads, spent about $2000 on a winter wheel/tire package, about maybe $500 on miscellaneous stuff. I have about ~16,500 miles equivalent of mileage, this is on an 09.
#6
Intermediate
iTrader: (1)
I've had my 2010 F for a year now and racked up 27500 miles. I just bought new front tires at 27000 miles. They measured the brake pads at roughly half gone and said the rotors were fine. I do not track my car. It's just a daily driver. It makes the daily commute a whole lot more fun
#7
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks guys. Thanks so much for the awesome insight!
That's a great question. I have my heart set on the 2009 IS-F, but after hearing about the maintenance costs, I am a little deterred. I am looking to spend between $37K-$45K, and I'm having a hard time imagining myself in something else.
I've also been thinking about Infinti's G37, Lexus GS430, and maybe even an M3 (but isn't the maintenance costs ridiculous as well?). Please feel free to let me know if you reccommend any other nice and realible cars.
Wow, that doesn't sound bad at all. How much were the tires (each?). It's not necessary to buy them a Lexus stealership right? Couldn't I get whatever tires i wanted as long as the specifications matched?
Good info. What was included in the winter wheel/tire package?
Is it really true that brake pads and rotors have to be replaced at the same time since cross drilled rotors can't be resurfaced? I wonder if the cost is really $3100 (from what I heard)?
Maintenance costs are expensive for all high performing vehicles, but the IS F doesn't appear to have too much regular maintenance outside of the oil changes. Brake pads and rotors, as well as tires, shouldn't have to be changed all that often if it's not being tracked. As lobuxracer mentioned, the tires should last a good 25-30,000 miles, although some here on the forums have posted much less tread life. As for pads, there are some quality alternatives that reduce the brake dust and I think a few are on or close to par as the OEM brake pads. But don't let these be the only reason to not jump into an F. It's a great ride and a great quality vehicle. Were there any other vehicles you were considering?
I've also been thinking about Infinti's G37, Lexus GS430, and maybe even an M3 (but isn't the maintenance costs ridiculous as well?). Please feel free to let me know if you reccommend any other nice and realible cars.
I've had my 2010 F for a year now and racked up 27500 miles. I just bought new front tires at 27000 miles. They measured the brake pads at roughly half gone and said the rotors were fine. I do not track my car. It's just a daily driver. It makes the daily commute a whole lot more fun
Trending Topics
#8
Lexus Test Driver
If you are worried about cost of owner ship DO NOT buy an M3. High performace cars use expensive parts for brakes and tires. The other cars you mention are not in the same league as the ISF.
In my opinion the cost of ownership for the ISF is VERY low considering the performance. Try owing a Porsche 911, I did, the costs sucked.
In my opinion the cost of ownership for the ISF is VERY low considering the performance. Try owing a Porsche 911, I did, the costs sucked.
#9
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Honeoye, NY
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rotors do not have to be changed with every pad replacement. They have to be replaced when they are worn down. Cross drilled rotors can be turned down but it's tricky and shops would rather install a new set. The $3100 price comes from dealership prices for parts and labor. I replace the brakes on all my cars. It gives me a chance to check everything out and allows me to select the parts.
#10
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you are worried about cost of owner ship DO NOT buy an M3. High performace cars use expensive parts for brakes and tires. The other cars you mention are not in the same league as the ISF.
In my opinion the cost of ownership for the ISF is VERY low considering the performance. Try owing a Porsche 911, I did, the costs sucked.
In my opinion the cost of ownership for the ISF is VERY low considering the performance. Try owing a Porsche 911, I did, the costs sucked.
#11
Lexus Test Driver
If repair and maintenance cost and reliability and performance are your biggest concerns I would stay away from German cars (BMW, Audi, AMG, etc.). I would look at the ISF, Subaru STI, and then giving up a little performance F-Sport IS350, Infinity G37S, Acura TL-S, really I'm partial to Japanese cars these days after some bad german car experiences.
#15
Given the price range you're looking at, the G37, Nissan's 370z, 2008 Lexus GS450h/460 would be great choices. But even though the IS F is a high performance car, the maintenance on them is very light in terms of costs compared to other high performance vehicles. And though the M3 is a really great car as with most German cars as UCrazyKid mentioned, maintenance will likely become an issue beyond the oil changes, tires, and pads. Personally, if I didn't get the F, I would probably have gotten a GS450h.