Any isf non staggered?
06-30-11, 07:03 PM
#1
Rookie
Thread Starter
Any isf non staggered?
I was think about this today does anyone have a non staggered fitment like for instance 19x9.5 around pushing 255s all around? Why wouldn't you have non staggered vs a staggered set up on an f? FYI I did search and nothing came up for the f.
06-30-11, 08:32 PM
#4
Tech Info Resource
iTrader: (2)
Non-staggered - SCCAForums ran Enkei PF01s in 18x9.5 +45ET with 285/30/18 Hoosier R6s on all four corners.
I'd love to figure out a way to do this with the OEM wheels, but there's no easy way to accomplish this - you'd have to widen the wheel and run spacers to make up for the added width.
I'd love to figure out a way to do this with the OEM wheels, but there's no easy way to accomplish this - you'd have to widen the wheel and run spacers to make up for the added width.
Trending Topics
07-01-11, 09:06 AM
#9
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NV
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
pretty light tho compared to TE37. 275/35. shave fenders and mod front fenderliner. No rub lock to lock. Was about a 1inch lower then stock no rubing on fast turns/cornering
07-01-11, 10:14 AM
#11
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NV
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-11-11, 06:07 AM
#13
Tech Info Resource
iTrader: (2)
No advantage to staggered setup. Square reduces understeer, and as heavy as the F is, it needs a LOT of rubber under it. Put it this way - I put 245/40/17s with 8.5" rims on a Scion tC, up from the OEM 215/45/17 on 7" rims. Mid corner speed went up an easy 6 mph (faster than my Supra on OEM sized tires!). This is on a 2915 lb car. Since the F is another 800 lbs or so (at least mine is), it stands to reason the car would be quite a bit faster with 315s or even 335s on all four corners to improve lateral grip.
I would not personally advocate a 9" rim. Too narrow for a 275 - it should be 9.5", or better still 10.0", and with a 30mm offset, you've got to do a lot of trimming, where the Enkei PF01s in a 9.5 with a 45mm offset can run 285 Hoosier R6's with no trimming anything.
If you just want the look, run whatever you can rig up.
I would not personally advocate a 9" rim. Too narrow for a 275 - it should be 9.5", or better still 10.0", and with a 30mm offset, you've got to do a lot of trimming, where the Enkei PF01s in a 9.5 with a 45mm offset can run 285 Hoosier R6's with no trimming anything.
If you just want the look, run whatever you can rig up.
07-20-11, 03:44 PM
#14
Rookie
Thread Starter
No advantage to staggered setup. Square reduces understeer, and as heavy as the F is, it needs a LOT of rubber under it. Put it this way - I put 245/40/17s with 8.5" rims on a Scion tC, up from the OEM 215/45/17 on 7" rims. Mid corner speed went up an easy 6 mph (faster than my Supra on OEM sized tires!). This is on a 2915 lb car. Since the F is another 800 lbs or so (at least mine is), it stands to reason the car would be quite a bit faster with 315s or even 335s on all four corners to improve lateral grip.
I would not personally advocate a 9" rim. Too narrow for a 275 - it should be 9.5", or better still 10.0", and with a 30mm offset, you've got to do a lot of trimming, where the Enkei PF01s in a 9.5 with a 45mm offset can run 285 Hoosier R6's with no trimming anything.
If you just want the look, run whatever you can rig up.
I would not personally advocate a 9" rim. Too narrow for a 275 - it should be 9.5", or better still 10.0", and with a 30mm offset, you've got to do a lot of trimming, where the Enkei PF01s in a 9.5 with a 45mm offset can run 285 Hoosier R6's with no trimming anything.
If you just want the look, run whatever you can rig up.
