IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

ECU tuning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-12, 10:20 AM
  #91  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,311
Received 3,953 Likes on 2,394 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 06isDriver
wow..... I just read through all 54 pages of that thread. What a let down! It's a downright shame that businesses take peoples money and then just disappear like that.
I wish this was the exception, but unfortunately, every tuner involved with an IS F project in this forum has screwed the owner and not delivered. It would really be refreshing to see someone deliver a working set up. Unfortunately, because the market is tiny and all businesses have limited resources to focus on problems like this (they have to be able to make a fair return on their time and effort) solving this problem will be either someone with a very large bankroll who is willing to burn it to prove it can be done, or we're just going to see more of the same - lots of excitement and hoopla at the beginning, increasing silence in the middle, then a quiet shuffle off to the failure corner at the end.

There are some very large and very real hurdles - the ECM and the fuel system. The direct injection only has so much capacity between the pumps and the injectors, so any solution larger than this will require using the manifold injectors to supplement which they were not designed or sized to do. Think LOTS of custom pieces. Then you've got to figure out how to get a supplemental ECM to run 16 injectors and tell the ECM that everything is working as expected so it doesn't try to mess with things. It's a lot easier said than done. There are no aftermarket ECU supporting 16 sequential injectors, so odds are, it's going to be a combination of batch fire and sequential (the DI must be a pass through) to accommodate existing electronics. You had it easy with only 12 injectors in the 2GR-FSE...

And just when you thought all the control systems could be handled, you've got the static compression ratio to fight, and no aftermarket pistons with lower compression are available. You'd be a total fool to put a thick headgasket in it because it would kill the angled squish they built into the combustion chamber and you'd likely do more harm than good.

So...

They've got their work cut out for them. It won't be easy to do it right. We've already seen how to do it wrong with a couple of vendors on the site...
Old 08-16-12, 04:34 PM
  #92  
Bugermass
Driver School Candidate
 
Bugermass's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hello, I'm one of the guys doing the RnD on Elmer's project. We will be fully controlling the direct injection. Most likely we will be using the factory DI drivers. We will also be controlling the port injectors. I'm currently studying the published Denso patents regarding the control of the VVTiE which is a slightly more complicated strategy to implement proper cam control with. As far as the exhaust cam control goes its nothing I havn't done before. Compression isn't an issue, and there ARE low compression pistons available for this motor should the need arise.

At one time at a shop I used to work for we inherited an ISF project from a shop that went under. It had a fully built motor with iron sleeves, pistons, rods, valvetrane etc etc. So the parts are there, just have to find them

I work closely with Jason Siebles from ProEFI and we are working vigilantly to be the first aftermarket EMS to properly and fully control DI. Most of the strategy is already in place in the current firmware versions and I'll actually be in AZ all next week spending time at ProEFI working on stuff ..

lobuxracer is correct that the port injection will have to be run in batch fire due to current hardware limitations. Running in batch fire on the secondary injection system is not going to affect performance one bit. At the time that the secondary injectors are staged in, injection timing will be unimportant. Once everything is in place we will be able to run the engine as good if not better than factory and we will be able to add flexfuel support as well as TONS of other features.

Last edited by caymandive; 08-16-12 at 04:53 PM. Reason: Removed advertisement link. Not an authorized vendor.
Old 08-16-12, 05:23 PM
  #93  
ISFSteve
Lead Lap
 
ISFSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow! This is the most informative and impressive response I have seen in the two years I have been on this forum regarding this topic. Very nice
Old 08-16-12, 11:38 PM
  #94  
ISF4life
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (30)
 
ISF4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SoCal714
Posts: 6,063
Received 164 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Please keep us up date
Old 08-16-12, 11:58 PM
  #95  
aWorkOfArt
Lexus Test Driver
 
aWorkOfArt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Guam
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

In for updates!
Old 08-17-12, 06:37 AM
  #96  
06isDriver
Lexus Test Driver
 
06isDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bugermass

lobuxracer is correct that the port injection will have to be run in batch fire due to current hardware limitations. Running in batch fire on the secondary injection system is not going to affect performance one bit. At the time that the secondary injectors are staged in, injection timing will be unimportant.
THis is good to know. I've been running a MAPECU system on mine and am preparing for a turbo setup but was limited in fuel delivery. The MAPECU can also run auxiallary injectors and I wanted to utilize the port injectors in the same manner you are suggesting, but batch firing was all that I could do. At what point do you plan on staging in the port injectors and how will the OEM ecu respond to highjacking them?
Old 08-17-12, 06:37 AM
  #97  
RCB
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (18)
 
RCB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 964
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I have only heard great things about ProEFI so that's a positive note. Good luck, hope to see your work pay off.
Old 08-17-12, 10:35 AM
  #98  
streetx
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (4)
 
streetx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MA
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

just thinking out loudly here, correct me if im wrong

wouldnt it make more logical sense to try and develop and tune the stock motor first. I mean eliminating boost and/or n2o off the bat should reduce the number of problems that may arise becuase you wont have a another factor to worry about
Old 08-17-12, 11:39 AM
  #99  
Bugermass
Driver School Candidate
 
Bugermass's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by streetx
just thinking out loudly here, correct me if im wrong

wouldnt it make more logical sense to try and develop and tune the stock motor first. I mean eliminating boost and/or n2o off the bat should reduce the number of problems that may arise becuase you wont have a another factor to worry about
Thats the plan..
Old 08-17-12, 11:43 AM
  #100  
Bugermass
Driver School Candidate
 
Bugermass's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 06isDriver
THis is good to know. I've been running a MAPECU system on mine and am preparing for a turbo setup but was limited in fuel delivery. The MAPECU can also run auxiallary injectors and I wanted to utilize the port injectors in the same manner you are suggesting, but batch firing was all that I could do. At what point do you plan on staging in the port injectors and how will the OEM ecu respond to highjacking them?
The problem with using a piggy back like map ECU or FIC is that the car blends between DI and PI at various times in various conditions, so you can't just disable the secondaries and take them over without causeing all kinds of issues. It would be so much simpler if they were just staged in at WOT or somthing but unfortunatly this is not how they work. By us taking over the WHOLE fuel system we will have control over when and how we stage in injection.

Also, keeping the factory ECU happy is a specialty of mine lol.. Its not easy but its usually possible with enough time and effort.
Old 08-17-12, 11:49 AM
  #101  
Bugermass
Driver School Candidate
 
Bugermass's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is definatly not a walk in the park, and there is alot of RnD that is going into making this work properly without upsetting the stock ECU. Later down the road for the people who don't care about CELs we will just take over everything, including the drive by wire. At that point the ECU can go full limp mode and the car will still drive normally. But for now our goal is to get the system working in harmony with the factory ECU by taking over the minimum systems needed to be able to tune the car. The factory variable cam and drive by wire stuff will still be handled by the stock ECU at this stage.
Old 08-17-12, 12:36 PM
  #102  
ISF4life
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (30)
 
ISF4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SoCal714
Posts: 6,063
Received 164 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Sounds very interesting and promising
Old 08-17-12, 12:55 PM
  #103  
streetx
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (4)
 
streetx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MA
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Good luck with the project and hope for the best,

i have a feeling the stock motor can yield some extra power from a tune but no one has been able to tune the car yet
Old 08-17-12, 03:26 PM
  #104  
mishkinm5
Driver School Candidate
iTrader: (1)
 
mishkinm5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Il
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I am hoping for positive results!
Old 08-17-12, 07:26 PM
  #105  
cchung0588
Rookie
iTrader: (-1)
 
cchung0588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: tx
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sounds promising


Quick Reply: ECU tuning



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:00 PM.