Dyno-Dynamics Heartbreaker
#16
Conversion/comparison to the newest local dynojet we have at a VERY reputable shop. Not to mention nearly every other car forum I researched.
I have not seen another ISF dyno'd on a Dyno-Dynamics
Dynojet seems to be in the 340-350Hp for a stock F.
I am going to follow up with a baseline on a Dynojet; hopefully this weekend.
I have not seen another ISF dyno'd on a Dyno-Dynamics
Dynojet seems to be in the 340-350Hp for a stock F.
I am going to follow up with a baseline on a Dynojet; hopefully this weekend.
#17
^^^^JE does not use a DynoJet Dyno, the use a Dynapack:
http://www.jeimportperformance.com/JE/?page_id=58
Lou
http://www.jeimportperformance.com/JE/?page_id=58
Lou
#18
^^^^JE does not use a DynoJet Dyno, the use a Dynapack:
http://www.jeimportperformance.com/JE/?page_id=58
Lou
http://www.jeimportperformance.com/JE/?page_id=58
Lou
Seems after scouring the internet, which is never wrong, that dynos go DD < Mustang < Dynojet < Dynapack
And Lou i've seen that dyno graph numerous times which means my numbers are in the correct area (with the conversion), it just sucks seeing the DD numbers lol
First things first is another dyno run with the stock intake on the same dyno.
#19
Which are notorious for high readings.
Seems after scouring the internet, which is never wrong, that dynos go DD < Mustang < Dynojet < Dynapack
And Lou i've seen that dyno graph numerous times which means my numbers are in the correct area (with the conversion), it just sucks seeing the DD numbers lol
First things first is another dyno run with the stock intake on the same dyno.
Seems after scouring the internet, which is never wrong, that dynos go DD < Mustang < Dynojet < Dynapack
And Lou i've seen that dyno graph numerous times which means my numbers are in the correct area (with the conversion), it just sucks seeing the DD numbers lol
First things first is another dyno run with the stock intake on the same dyno.
#20
JMHO...
#21
Which are notorious for high readings.
Seems after scouring the internet, which is never wrong, that dynos go DD < Mustang < Dynojet < Dynapack
And Lou i've seen that dyno graph numerous times which means my numbers are in the correct area (with the conversion), it just sucks seeing the DD numbers lol
First things first is another dyno run with the stock intake on the same dyno.
Seems after scouring the internet, which is never wrong, that dynos go DD < Mustang < Dynojet < Dynapack
And Lou i've seen that dyno graph numerous times which means my numbers are in the correct area (with the conversion), it just sucks seeing the DD numbers lol
First things first is another dyno run with the stock intake on the same dyno.
Generally speaking that is what is acknowledged. But it also depends on the individual dyno, as the software and settings also affect the readings which each dyno puts out. A local shop here in Toronto has a Dynapack that puts out almost the exact same numbers as a dynojet, which they were able to confirm using a number of cars which ran on both dynos.
But also, as said, the best way is to run a baseline and then mods on the exact same dyno under simillar conditions.
#22
The dyno dynamics I went to is owned by the best custom tuner in our area, not to mention a great guy.
The dynojet is owned by Davenport Motorsports, mostly a Corvette shop.
and I was being facetious about the "internet never wrong comment"
#23
Just found these three dyno sheets from the same shop a few years ago. Car was a 2008 ISF I beleive, and he was a member here.
1)stock
2)Joe Z intake tube and exhaust
3)Joe Z exhaust and K&N Typhoon intake
Now I'm wondering if there is something wrong with my car, or if the conditions on the dyno have changed drastically.
1)stock
2)Joe Z intake tube and exhaust
3)Joe Z exhaust and K&N Typhoon intake
Now I'm wondering if there is something wrong with my car, or if the conditions on the dyno have changed drastically.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lexiss_sc430
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
16
07-15-11 05:49 PM
caymandive
Performance
43
06-19-07 01:53 PM
MadMaxSC400
Performance & Maintenance
9
06-11-03 10:00 AM