IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

High Altitude + Tune = Think again (bye KCLV)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-16 | 02:27 AM
  #61  
mystikal30's Avatar
mystikal30
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Default

Awesome news! I've been waiting on pulling the trigger on the tuned intake hoping that there will be gains for us here in Albuquerque being a mile high like you guys in Colorado. The best I could manage up here with I/H/E is 13.3@107. Maybe with the tuned intake and better air I could dip into the 12's, What times are you guys seeing in Colorado with full bolt on's?
Old 07-02-16 | 06:27 AM
  #62  
RRRacing's Avatar
RRRacing
Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 2,728
Likes: 1,423
From: Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by MileHIFcar
I can vouch I was with him when we were testing it last night ending the lives of hundreds of bugs at triple digit speeds

It does feel a lot better on the top end, so guessing more tweaking will be done to the tune and the high altitude portion might be taken care of

Like DC guy said more testing will ensue tonight and over the next week so stay tuned!

Josh... really want to thank you for all your patience throughout this, particularly the datalogging of the stock cars really helped us figure out what was wrong with the tune at altitude. We still have some work to do, but based on the mods, I am quiet confidant you are making much better power numbers now than before.

Really curious to see of the tuned intake will help at altitude.

Looks like the mass airflow at altitude is about 20% less than we are seeing near sea level... but the volume airflow rate might be the same or higher. So if we operate on the assumption that airflow rate through the intake is limited by the volume airflow rate, then the tuned intake could help -- we shall see!

Rafi
__________________
We Engineer Track Proven Upgrades For Your Lexus!
SUPERCHARGERS : ECU TUNING : SUSPENSION : EXHAUST : PPE MASTER DEALER
Online Store: www.RR-Racing.com
Email: Contact@RR-Racing.com
Phone: 484-756-1777
Facebook : Youtube

Old 07-02-16 | 10:26 AM
  #63  
MileHIFcar's Avatar
MileHIFcar
Pole Position
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,673
Likes: 405
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by RRRacing
Josh... really want to thank you for all your patience throughout this, particularly the datalogging of the stock cars really helped us figure out what was wrong with the tune at altitude. We still have some work to do, but based on the mods, I am quiet confidant you are making much better power numbers now than before.

Really curious to see of the tuned intake will help at altitude.

Looks like the mass airflow at altitude is about 20% less than we are seeing near sea level... but the volume airflow rate might be the same or higher. So if we operate on the assumption that airflow rate through the intake is limited by the volume airflow rate, then the tuned intake could help -- we shall see!

Rafi
Yea exactly! What he said^^^
Old 11-09-16 | 06:16 AM
  #64  
FilwithanF's Avatar
FilwithanF
Pit Crew
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 138
Likes: 76
From: Colorado
Default

Just wanted to see if any more progress was made on the high altitude tune? I'm in CO and looking to buy an ISF soon and a tune. Did anyone try the RR tuned intake? Did it help? Thanks folks!
Old 11-09-16 | 08:31 AM
  #65  
liquidtek's Avatar
liquidtek
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 636
Likes: 96
From: CO
Default

Originally Posted by FilwithanF
Just wanted to see if any more progress was made on the high altitude tune? I'm in CO and looking to buy an ISF soon and a tune. Did anyone try the RR tuned intake? Did it help? Thanks folks!
I guess I should have updated this thread a little bit with our findings. A lot of the local guys with the RR tune worked diligently with Rafi to get a revised high altitude tune. We saw improvement with the tune. I eventually received a revised tune from TTFS which also helped but didn't get ideal results like the guys at sea level. It wasn't until we started blending e85 with 91 to start seeing the benefits of the tune here at altitude. MileHIFcar ran the tuned intake without headers and ethanol blend and saw improvements but he's full bolt on now. I think if you're going to go the tune route blending e85 is a must for the best benefits of the tune. Even without the tune you'd see benefits of blending e85. Check the other thread for information on the blending stuff. Even without the revised altitude tune we are seeing benefits on the basic tune here. I actually have both tunes now (RR & TTFS) and often switch between the two to experiment after a few months.
Old 11-09-16 | 11:23 AM
  #66  
FilwithanF's Avatar
FilwithanF
Pit Crew
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 138
Likes: 76
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by liquidtek
I guess I should have updated this thread a little bit with our findings. A lot of the local guys with the RR tune worked diligently with Rafi to get a revised high altitude tune. We saw improvement with the tune. I eventually received a revised tune from TTFS which also helped but didn't get ideal results like the guys at sea level. It wasn't until we started blending e85 with 91 to start seeing the benefits of the tune here at altitude. MileHIFcar ran the tuned intake without headers and ethanol blend and saw improvements but he's full bolt on now. I think if you're going to go the tune route blending e85 is a must for the best benefits of the tune. Even without the tune you'd see benefits of blending e85. Check the other thread for information on the blending stuff. Even without the revised altitude tune we are seeing benefits on the basic tune here. I actually have both tunes now (RR & TTFS) and often switch between the two to experiment after a few months.
Thank you so much for your response! If I may ask, were there any HP/TQ gains without E85 and with, if anyone dyno'd?
Old 11-09-16 | 01:14 PM
  #67  
liquidtek's Avatar
liquidtek
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 636
Likes: 96
From: CO
Default

Originally Posted by FilwithanF
Thank you so much for your response! If I may ask, were there any HP/TQ gains without E85 and with, if anyone dyno'd?
With the multiple dynos and tunes I've bought I don't feel like sinking anymore money into any immediate dyno session until after I get headers. I'm guessing the improvements are marginal at best but the e85 with the added octane keeps the engine and KCLV numbers happier at this altitude than it does with just plain ol 91. My most recent non revision dyno results are on the first page.

Last edited by liquidtek; 11-09-16 at 01:17 PM.
Old 11-10-16 | 08:22 AM
  #68  
FilwithanF's Avatar
FilwithanF
Pit Crew
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 138
Likes: 76
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by liquidtek
With the multiple dynos and tunes I've bought I don't feel like sinking anymore money into any immediate dyno session until after I get headers. I'm guessing the improvements are marginal at best but the e85 with the added octane keeps the engine and KCLV numbers happier at this altitude than it does with just plain ol 91. My most recent non revision dyno results are on the first page.
I definitely can understand that. Thank you for explaining! What headers are you going with, if I may ask?
Old 11-10-16 | 10:15 PM
  #69  
liquidtek's Avatar
liquidtek
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 636
Likes: 96
From: CO
Default

Originally Posted by FilwithanF
I definitely can understand that. Thank you for explaining! What headers are you going with, if I may ask?
Probably order PPE in the next couple months.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
darbs242
IS F (2008-2014)
13
07-30-12 08:10 PM
JBrady
Performance
8
12-19-11 09:33 PM
KC95SC400
Performance & Maintenance
26
11-22-08 09:39 PM
RMMGS4
Northern California Lexus Club
196
12-06-06 11:53 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:22 PM.