IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

Thoughts on how the IS-F will hold it's value over the next few years?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-17, 08:08 AM
  #61  
s2kimport
Driver School Candidate
 
s2kimport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 33
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
I know quite a bit about Honda engine development. Honda engineers determined the ultimate engine red line was at 24k rpm because the engines couldn't breathe at any speed above that. Their legendary (and ground breaking) engines were all in motorcycles - like the NR 750 with its oval pistons and two rods per cylinder or the NS500 triple that took Freddie Spencer to world F1 championships. Winning awards like "International Engine of the Year" is like being in the upper right quadrant of a Gartner chart. Very little objective, plenty of subjective. Nissan VQ engines won the same awards, but nothing out of Japan has accomplished what the 2JZ-GTE has in terms of ultimate horsepower, variety of applications, and absurd reliability in stock form.

I built motorcycle engines for road racing and mini-sprints for a time. I am extremely familiar with Honda and how they do what they do.
f20c like already mentioned before, 9k and 120hp per liter, Honda warranty and super reliable, that by it self is legendary. You can argue the K20 might be better, but since it's fwd it doesn't have the same desirability like the s2000. Plus, s2k came out in 1999, no K20 was around that time.

Also, mention me another stock engine with high compression (4 cylinder NA) like the F20c that can handle 800whp (stock engine)? Trans and differential might be weak but the engine is super strong and reliable just like the 2JZ-GTE.

The only reason the s2k hasn't gone up in price yet is because Honda made too many, if they had only done less than 15,000 units, they would be in the 30k range like the integra Type R, if not more.....Give it time, a lot of young people are wrecking them, it will take time until the s2k goes up in price, right now its heading that direction but still not there.
s2kimport is offline  
Old 03-22-17, 10:01 AM
  #62  
JPxMODz
Lead Lap
iTrader: (3)
 
JPxMODz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: SK Canada
Posts: 570
Received 111 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

I think you can count on the IS-F being something special in the near future as there were only around 12,000 units produced worldwide over a sever year production run
JPxMODz is offline  
Old 03-22-17, 07:18 PM
  #63  
EverestWC
Driver School Candidate
 
EverestWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Maryland
Posts: 31
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Interesting read. I just joined this forum as I'm considering an IS-F. I currently have a 94 Supra original 6spd that I just put for sale. I was thinking of a 11+ IS-F to replace it and was hoping they'd hold some value and perhaps not drop below $20,000 for a clean under 100k mile Car. One thing that helps values in my opinion is the constant appreciation in price of new cars. In 5 years a new 2022 IS-F (if they were to release another) would probably be over $80k. So $25k would seem reasonable to me to still fetch for a 2001 IS-F with 100k miles. My 2 cents which is probably only worth 1c
EverestWC is offline  
Old 03-22-17, 07:51 PM
  #64  
tas02
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
tas02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: WA
Posts: 1,063
Received 31 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally posted by lobuxracer:

"I know quite a bit about Honda engine development. ... Their legendary (and ground breaking) engines were all in motorcycles - ..."

Uhhhh, what about a what couple of guys named Senna & Prost did using Honda powerplants in the 1980's?
tas02 is offline  
Old 03-22-17, 08:31 PM
  #65  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,324
Received 3,968 Likes on 2,402 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tas02
Originally posted by lobuxracer:

"I know quite a bit about Honda engine development. ... Their legendary (and ground breaking) engines were all in motorcycles - ..."

Uhhhh, what about a what couple of guys named Senna & Prost did using Honda powerplants in the 1980's?
Reading is fundamental:
Originally Posted by lobuxracer
While we are at it, legendary isn't a term associated with any Honda car engine I have ever heard about outside of their turbo F1 engines. Legendary is reserved for the 2JZ-GTE and RB26DETT.
And I still say the NR750 and NR500 engines were the pinnacle of engineering achievement. No one on the planet ever thought it possible to build a competitive engine with oval pistons. Lots of people can build engines with round pistons. Only Honda built oval pistons.
lobuxracer is offline  
Old 03-22-17, 10:56 PM
  #66  
tas02
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
tas02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: WA
Posts: 1,063
Received 31 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally posted by lobuxracer:

"Legendary is reserved for the 2JZ-GTE and RB26DETT."

Thank you, sir. However, I respectively disagree. The F20's incredible specific output qualifies it as legendary as well.
tas02 is offline  
Old 03-22-17, 11:21 PM
  #67  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,324
Received 3,968 Likes on 2,402 Posts
Default

It's really hard to get excited about any car engine's specific output when a 2015 Yamaha R1 makes 167 rwhp out of 998cc straight off the showroom floor. Specific output on car engines really doesn't hold much in my book. And, yes, that's NA and no, it hasn't been optimized by doing all the fun stuff I've been paid to do to make sure all the available design power is present. If we want to measure against specific output, why not measure against the NA F1 car engines with 20k rpm redlines? Those engines produced ridiculous specific output numbers.

We can clearly agree to disagree.
lobuxracer is offline  
Old 03-22-17, 11:35 PM
  #68  
ISFPOWER
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (20)
 
ISFPOWER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NORTH CAROLINA
Posts: 3,236
Received 144 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s2kimport
f20c like already mentioned before, 9k and 120hp per liter, Honda warranty and super reliable, that by it self is legendary. You can argue the K20 might be better, but since it's fwd it doesn't have the same desirability like the s2000. Plus, s2k came out in 1999, no K20 was around that time.

Also, mention me another stock engine with high compression (4 cylinder NA) like the F20c that can handle 800whp (stock engine)? Trans and differential might be weak but the engine is super strong and reliable just like the 2JZ-GTE.

The only reason the s2k hasn't gone up in price yet is because Honda made too many, if they had only done less than 15,000 units, they would be in the 30k range like the integra Type R, if not more.....Give it time, a lot of young people are wrecking them, it will take time until the s2k goes up in price, right now its heading that direction but still not there.

120hp per liter, lightweight car and still slow.
ISFPOWER is offline  
The following users liked this post:
2URGSE (05-22-17)
Old 03-23-17, 07:09 AM
  #69  
MpKSonic
Driver
 
MpKSonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: CO
Posts: 175
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ISFPOWER
120hp per liter, lightweight car and still slow.
Stock twin-turbo Supra's are decently slower than a stock F, too.
MpKSonic is offline  
Old 03-23-17, 07:33 AM
  #70  
kolyan
Advanced
 
kolyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 633
Received 34 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ISFPOWER
120hp per liter, lightweight car and still slow.
Slow where? In a drag race? On a technical track it will leave ISF in a cloud of dust.
kolyan is offline  
Old 03-23-17, 08:32 AM
  #71  
s2kimport
Driver School Candidate
 
s2kimport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 33
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ISFPOWER
120hp per liter, lightweight car and still slow.

Lol, here comes the drag racer lmao.

It's a 1999 car, 1/4 times since you seem to care only was 13.8-14.0, not bad for a 2750 pounds car 4 cylinder all motor.
s2kimport is offline  
Old 03-23-17, 11:32 AM
  #72  
mk416
Advanced
 
mk416's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: CA
Posts: 674
Received 50 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

F20C burns oil and lacks torque on the curve. F22C is a better motor imo.
mk416 is offline  
Old 03-23-17, 11:44 AM
  #73  
jspecvtec
Lead Lap
iTrader: (4)
 
jspecvtec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 777
Received 51 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kolyan
Slow where? In a drag race? On a technical track it will leave ISF in a cloud of dust.
This is true. I have S2k friends who are all suspension and aero parts on their weak NA stock motors destroying new m3, m4, Porsche turbos, rcfs by 10+ secs at buttonwillow lol
jspecvtec is offline  
Old 03-23-17, 01:04 PM
  #74  
newgsman
Instructor
iTrader: (4)
 
newgsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 919
Received 90 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jspecvtec
This is true. I have S2k friends who are all suspension and aero parts on their weak NA stock motors destroying new m3, m4, Porsche turbos, rcfs by 10+ secs at buttonwillow lol
I don't doubt this but I also suspect your observations may have a lot to do with the driver than the car. I am sure mods do wonders for the S2K but if you look at )ct 2015 C&D lightening lap, a stock 2008 S2K is 10+ seconds slower than the ISF as well as a lot of the cars mentioned above.
newgsman is offline  
Old 03-23-17, 01:22 PM
  #75  
tas02
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
tas02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: WA
Posts: 1,063
Received 31 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Btw, what was the topic of this thread?
tas02 is offline  


Quick Reply: Thoughts on how the IS-F will hold it's value over the next few years?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:25 PM.